• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估多中心定性痴呆研究的普遍性:欧洲“思维”(MinD)项目所面临的经验与挑战

Assessing the generalisability of a multicentre qualitative dementia research: the experience and challenges faced by the MinD project in Europe.

作者信息

Lim Jennifer N W, Niedderer Kristina, Tournier Isabelle, Almeida Rosa, Harrison Dew, Holthoff-Detto Vjera, Ludden Geke, van Rompay Thomas, van der Voort Mascha, Galansinska Aleksandra, Smith Tina, Lasada Raquel L, Bueno Yolanda A, Druschke Diana, Ziebuhr Berit, Zanasi Michele

机构信息

Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY, UK.

Manchester School of Art, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Open Res Eur. 2021 Nov 10;1:64. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.13700.3. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.13700.3
PMID:37645110
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10446055/
Abstract

: Generalisation of findings is an important aspect of research and essential for evidence-based practice. While generalisation is common in quantitative research, there is a lack of generalisability in qualitative research. This paper presents the experience and challenges faced by the Designing for People with Dementia (MinD) project in meeting the requirements to strengthen the generalisation of findings on the lived experience of people living with dementia and their engagement to co-create designs to empower their everyday living.   : Polit and Beck (2010)'s strategies to generalise qualitative findings were applied: (1) replication in sampling; (2) replication of studies; (3) meta-synthesis of findings; (4) reflexivity and conceptualization; (5) immersion with the data; and (6) thick description. : While it is possible to increase the generabilisabilty of qualitative evidence through the replication of the sampling to attain a large, heterogeneous sample in different and multiple contexts and environments; implementation of sound and robust research; conducting in-depth analysis and interpretation collaboratively for emergent themes; and meeting the thick description requirement, there are challenges that the project team faced in implementing some of the Polit and Beck's strategies because of the condition, namely dementia, that our participants are having. Other challenges faced were: the language and cultural diversity in the team; diverse  work and organisational procedures; and the inter-disciplinary differences relating to the methods of enquiry, approaches and techniques to conduct research. These challenges will need to be identified and addressed at the start of the project with a strong leadership to ensure a seamless journey to complete the project successfully. Trust between the researchers and participants, and time to build this trust are critical to recruitment and participation in the study; these factors are of utmost important in research involving participants with condition such as dementia.

摘要

研究结果的推广是研究的一个重要方面,也是循证实践的关键。虽然推广在定量研究中很常见,但定性研究中却缺乏可推广性。本文介绍了为痴呆症患者设计(MinD)项目在满足加强关于痴呆症患者生活经历及其参与共同创造设计以增强其日常生活能力的研究结果推广要求方面所面临的经验和挑战。

采用了波利特和贝克(2010年)推广定性研究结果的策略:(1)抽样中的复制;(2)研究的复制;(3)结果的元综合;(4)反思与概念化;(5)沉浸于数据;以及(6)详细描述。

虽然通过复制抽样以在不同和多个背景及环境中获得一个大的、异质的样本;实施合理且稳健的研究;对新出现的主题进行协作式深入分析和解释;以及满足详细描述要求,有可能提高定性证据的可推广性,但由于我们的参与者患有痴呆症这一状况,项目团队在实施波利特和贝克的一些策略时面临挑战。其他面临的挑战包括:团队中的语言和文化多样性;多样的工作和组织程序;以及与研究方法、途径和技术相关的跨学科差异。这些挑战需要在项目开始时由强有力的领导加以识别和解决,以确保顺利完成项目。研究人员与参与者之间的信任以及建立这种信任的时间对于研究的招募和参与至关重要;在涉及痴呆症等状况参与者的研究中,这些因素极为重要。

相似文献

1
Assessing the generalisability of a multicentre qualitative dementia research: the experience and challenges faced by the MinD project in Europe.评估多中心定性痴呆研究的普遍性:欧洲“思维”(MinD)项目所面临的经验与挑战
Open Res Eur. 2021 Nov 10;1:64. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.13700.3. eCollection 2021.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Engagement of people with lived experience of dementia advisory group and cross-cutting program: reflections on the first year.让患有痴呆症的人参与咨询小组和跨部门项目:第一年的反思
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jun 25;8(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00359-5.
6
Co-producing research with people impacted by dementia and service providers: issues and challenges.与受痴呆症影响的人和服务提供者共同开展研究:问题和挑战。
Public Health Res Pract. 2022 Jun 15;32(2):3222216. doi: 10.17061/phrp3222216.
7
8
9
A SHARED study-the benefits and costs of setting up a health research study involving lay co-researchers and how we overcame the challenges.一项关于设立一项涉及非专业共同研究者的健康研究的益处与成本的联合研究,以及我们是如何克服这些挑战的。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Mar 3;2:8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0021-3. eCollection 2016.
10
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Framing the Multi-Centre Qualitative Research Design as a Novel Methodology for Nursing and Healthcare Research: Reflections and A Methodological Discussion.将多中心定性研究设计构建为护理与医疗保健研究的一种新方法:思考与方法学探讨
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Oct 24. doi: 10.1111/jan.16548.
2
Women's Health Information-Seeking Experiences and Preferences for Health Communications on FDA-Regulated Products: A Qualitative Study in Urban Area.女性健康信息寻求体验及对 FDA 监管产品健康传播的偏好:城市地区的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Mar 9;21(3):321. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030321.
3
Understanding and Balancing Generalist-Specialist Approaches in Dementia Research and Care Practice, Qualitative Research with 44 Dementia Professors in The Netherlands.理解和平衡痴呆症研究和护理实践中的通才-专家方法,对荷兰 44 名痴呆症教授的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;20(5):3835. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053835.

本文引用的文献

1
This is Me: Evaluation of a boardgame to promote social engagement, wellbeing and agency in people with dementia through mindful life-storytelling.这是我:通过正念生活故事讲述来评估一款棋盘游戏,以促进痴呆症患者的社交参与、幸福感和自主性。
J Aging Stud. 2022 Mar;60:100995. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100995. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
2
Co-creativity, well-being and agency: A case study analysis of a co-creative arts group for people with dementia.共创意、幸福感和能动性:一个针对痴呆症患者的共创意艺团体的案例研究分析。
J Aging Stud. 2019 Jun;49:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
3
Overcoming barriers to facilitate the regulation of multi-centre regenerative medicine clinical trials.克服障碍,促进多中心再生医学临床试验的监管。
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018 Nov 8;9(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-1055-2.
4
Young onset dementia: Public involvement in co-designing community-based support.早发性痴呆:公众参与基于社区支持的协同设计。
Dementia (London). 2020 May;19(4):1051-1066. doi: 10.1177/1471301218793463. Epub 2018 Aug 19.
5
The experiences of people with young-onset dementia: A meta-ethnographic review of the qualitative literature.早发性痴呆患者的经历:对定性文献的元民族志综述
Maturitas. 2016 Oct;92:102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.07.019. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
6
Psychosocial interventions for people with dementia: An overview and commentary on recent developments.针对痴呆症患者的心理社会干预:近期发展概述与评论
Dementia (London). 2019 Jan;18(1):8-35. doi: 10.1177/1471301216656096. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
7
An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research.致《英国医学杂志》编辑的一封关于定性研究的公开信。
BMJ. 2016 Feb 10;352:i563. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i563.
8
Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research.定性研究中的效度和信度问题。
Evid Based Nurs. 2015 Apr;18(2):34-5. doi: 10.1136/eb-2015-102054. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
9
Conducting a multicentre and multinational qualitative study on patient transitions.开展一项关于患者转诊的多中心、跨国质性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21 Suppl 1:i22-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001197. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
10
Co-research with older people with dementia: experience and reflections.与痴呆症老年人共同研究:经验与反思。
J Ment Health. 2012 Jun;21(3):296-306. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2011.651658.