• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定义发现:谷歌学术是一个发现平台吗?一篇关于需要一种新的学术发现方法的文章。

Defining discovery: Is Google Scholar a discovery platform? An essay on the need for a new approach to scholarly discovery.

作者信息

Achenbach Kelly, Błaszczyńska Marta, De Paoli Stefano, Di Donato Francesca, Dumouchel Suzanne, Forbes Paula, Kraker Peter, Vignoli Michela

机构信息

Max Weber Stiftung - Deutsche Geisteswissenschaftliche Institute im Ausland, Bonn, 53173, Germany.

Institute of Literary Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, 00-330, Poland.

出版信息

Open Res Eur. 2022 Jun 7;2:28. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14318.2. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.14318.2
PMID:37645282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10445934/
Abstract

This essay discusses the concept of discovery, intended as content discovery, and defines it in the new context of Open Science, with a focus on Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH). Starting from the example of Google Scholar, the authors show that this well established service does not address the current needs, practices, and variety of discovery. Alternatives in terms of technical choices, features, and governance, do however exist, offering richer and more open discovery. The paper presents in particular the implementations and research work of the H2020 project TRIPLE (Transforming Research through Innovative Practices for Linked Interdisciplinary Exploration). Dedicated to the building of a discovery platform for the SSH, the project is meant to address the specificities and evolution of discovery in this field.  Prevailing scholarly resource platforms like Google Scholar limit discovery by focussing only on publications, and favouring through their algorithm well-cited papers, English content, and discipline-specific resources. A limitation in the context of cross-disciplinary and collaborative Open Science, such a service more specifically hinders discovery in the SSH. Characterized by a fragmented landscape, a variety of languages, data types, and outputs, research in the SSH requires services that fully exploit discovery potentialities.  Moreover, a survey conducted within the TRIPLE project showed that most SSH researchers use Google Scholar as their starting point, and that they recognise the lack of control they have with this system. Beyond the extension of features and content, transparency is the other important criterion for the building of an Open Infrastructure actually serving the research community. In light of this, we present in some detail the GoTriple platform, which exploits today's technological potential and incorporates the best known functionalities in order to unveil more and innovative scholarly outputs and lead to international and interdisciplinary research project collaborations.

摘要

本文讨论了作为内容发现的发现概念,并在开放科学的新背景下对其进行定义,重点关注社会科学和人文科学(SSH)。作者从谷歌学术的例子出发,表明这项成熟的服务无法满足当前发现的需求、实践和多样性。然而,在技术选择、功能和治理方面存在替代方案,可提供更丰富、更开放的发现。本文特别介绍了H2020项目TRIPLE(通过创新实践促进跨学科关联探索实现研究转型)的实施情况和研究工作。该项目致力于为社会科学和人文科学构建一个发现平台,旨在解决该领域发现的特殊性和发展问题。像谷歌学术这样占主导地位的学术资源平台仅专注于出版物来限制发现,并通过其算法偏袒被大量引用的论文、英文内容和特定学科资源。在跨学科和协作的开放科学背景下,这样的服务更具体地阻碍了社会科学和人文科学领域的发现。社会科学和人文科学研究的特点是领域分散、语言多样、数据类型和产出各异,需要能充分挖掘发现潜力的服务。此外,TRIPLE项目内进行的一项调查显示,大多数社会科学和人文科学研究人员将谷歌学术作为起点,并且他们认识到对该系统缺乏控制权。除了功能和内容的扩展,透明度是构建真正服务于研究社区的开放基础设施的另一个重要标准。有鉴于此,我们详细介绍了GoTriple平台,该平台利用当今的技术潜力并整合最知名的功能,以揭示更多创新的学术成果,并促成国际和跨学科研究项目合作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb2e/10446361/a777a54db965/openreseurope-2-16066-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb2e/10446361/a777a54db965/openreseurope-2-16066-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb2e/10446361/a777a54db965/openreseurope-2-16066-g0000.jpg

相似文献

1
Defining discovery: Is Google Scholar a discovery platform? An essay on the need for a new approach to scholarly discovery.定义发现:谷歌学术是一个发现平台吗?一篇关于需要一种新的学术发现方法的文章。
Open Res Eur. 2022 Jun 7;2:28. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14318.2. eCollection 2022.
2
The case for an inclusive scholarly communication infrastructure for social sciences and humanities.支持建立一个包容的社会科学和人文学科学术交流基础架构。
F1000Res. 2020 Oct 22;9:1265. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.26545.1. eCollection 2020.
3
Open Science Training in TRIPLE.TRIPLE中的开放科学培训。
Open Res Eur. 2023 Jun 5;3:39. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.15430.2. eCollection 2023.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Patterns of internationalization and criteria for research assessment in the social sciences and humanities.社会科学与人文科学的国际化模式及研究评估标准。
Scientometrics. 2016;107:357-368. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1845-1. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Is social sciences and humanities (SSH) premedical education marginalized in the medical school admission process? A review and contextualization of the literature.医学预科教育中的社会科学与人文学(SSH)是否被边缘化?对文献的回顾与背景分析。
Acad Med. 2014 Jul;89(7):1075-86. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000284.
9
An agenda for future Social Sciences and Humanities research on energy efficiency: 100 priority research questions.未来社会科学与人文科学能源效率研究议程:100个优先研究问题。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):223. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01243-z. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
10
Why are social sciences and humanities needed in the works of IPBES? A systematic review of the literature.国际生物多样性与生态系统服务政府间科学政策平台的工作中为何需要社会科学和人文科学?文献综述
Innovation (Abingdon). 2018 Mar 1;31("Suppl 1"):78-100. doi: 10.1080/13511610.2018.1443799. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Innovations in scholarly communication - global survey on research tool usage.学术交流的创新——关于研究工具使用情况的全球调查。
F1000Res. 2016 Apr 18;5:692. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8414.1. eCollection 2016.
2
Research data explored: an extended analysis of citations and altmetrics.所探究的研究数据:对引用和替代计量指标的扩展分析
Scientometrics. 2016;107:723-744. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1887-4. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
3
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship.科学数据管理和保存的 FAIR 指导原则。
Sci Data. 2016 Mar 15;3:160018. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
4
The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching.谷歌学术在循证综述中的作用及其在灰色文献检索中的适用性。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 17;10(9):e0138237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138237. eCollection 2015.
5
Translating scientific discoveries into public health action: how can schools of public health move us forward?将科学发现转化为公共卫生行动:公共卫生学院如何推动我们前进?
Public Health Rep. 2006 Jan-Feb;121(1):97-103. doi: 10.1177/003335490612100118.