Suppr超能文献

关于高后果病原体疫情防范与应对研究优先级确定的范围综述方案。

Scoping review protocol on research prioritisation for preparedness and response to outbreaks of high consequence pathogens.

作者信息

Antonio Emilia, Chepkirui Dorothy, Levanita Shanthi, Ibrahim Susan Khader, Foster Isabel, Harriss Eli, Sigfrid Louise, Norton Alice

机构信息

Global Research Collaboration for Infectious Disease Preparedness (GloPID-R) Research and Policy Team, Global Research Collaboration for Infectious Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.

出版信息

Open Res Eur. 2024 Apr 29;3:16. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.15335.1. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prioritisation of research activities for infectious disease pathogens is usually undertaken through the identification of important research and knowledge gaps. Research prioritisation is an essential element of both effective responses to disease outbreaks and adequate preparedness. There is however currently no published mapping of activities on and evidence from research prioritisation for high consequence pathogens. The objectives of this review are to map all published research prioritisation exercises on high-consequence pathogens; provide an overview of methodologies employed for prioritising research for these pathogens; describe monitoring and evaluation processes for research areas prioritised; and identify any standards and guidance for effectively undertaking research prioritisation activities for high consequence pathogens.

METHODS

The Joanna Briggs Institute guidance of scoping review conduct will be used. The search will be undertaken using the key terms of "research prioritisation", "response", "control", and related terms, and a list of high-consequence pathogens derived from WHO (2020), EMERGE (2019), Europe CDC (2022) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (2021). We will search ; . Backward citations review of the included full text documents will also be conducted. and will be searched for grey literature. Two independent reviewers will screen the retrieved documents using and extract data in a data extraction template in Microsoft Excel 2021. Screening results will be presented using the PRISMA-ScR template with narrative synthesis undertaken for the extracted data.

CONCLUSION

This review will map existing research priorities for high consequence pathogens. Further, it will provide an understanding of methodologies used for prioritisation, processes for monitoring and evaluation of progress made against research agendas, and evidence on standards that could be recommended for effective prioritisation of research for high consequence pathogens.

摘要

背景

传染病病原体研究活动的优先排序通常通过识别重要的研究和知识空白来进行。研究优先排序是有效应对疾病暴发和充分做好准备的重要组成部分。然而,目前尚无关于高后果病原体研究优先排序活动及其证据的公开图谱。本综述的目的是梳理所有已发表的关于高后果病原体的研究优先排序活动;概述针对这些病原体进行研究优先排序所采用的方法;描述对优先排序的研究领域的监测和评估过程;并确定有效开展高后果病原体研究优先排序活动的任何标准和指南。

方法

将采用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所关于范围综述开展的指南。搜索将使用“研究优先排序”“应对”“控制”及相关术语作为关键词,并结合世界卫生组织(2020年)、新兴传染病研究与创新联盟(2019年)、欧洲疾病预防控制中心(2022年)和东南亚国家联盟(2021年)列出的高后果病原体清单进行。我们将搜索……还将对纳入的全文文档进行反向引文审查。将搜索……和……以获取灰色文献。两名独立评审员将使用……筛选检索到的文档,并在Microsoft Excel 2021中的数据提取模板中提取数据。筛选结果将使用PRISMA-ScR模板呈现,并对提取的数据进行叙述性综合分析。

结论

本综述将梳理高后果病原体现有的研究重点。此外,它将有助于理解用于优先排序的方法、针对研究议程进展的监测和评估过程,以及关于可推荐用于有效进行高后果病原体研究优先排序的标准的证据。

相似文献

3
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验