• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过漂移扩散模型阐明精神病中的认知控制缺陷

Clarifying Cognitive Control Deficits in Psychosis via Drift Diffusion Modeling.

作者信息

Shen Chen, Calvin Olivia L, Rawls Eric, Redish A David, Sponheim Scott R

机构信息

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455 USA.

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, One Veterans Drive, Minneapolis MN 55417 USA.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2023 Aug 16:2023.08.14.23293891. doi: 10.1101/2023.08.14.23293891.

DOI:10.1101/2023.08.14.23293891
PMID:37645877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10462223/
Abstract

Cognitive control deficits are consistently identified in individuals with schizophrenia and other psychotic psychopathologies. In this analysis, we delineated proactive and reactive control deficits in psychotic psychopathology via hierarchical Drift Diffusion Modeling (hDDM). People with psychosis (PwP; N=123), their first-degree relatives (N=79), and controls (N=51) completed the Dot Pattern Expectancy task, which allows differentiation between proactive and reactive control. PwP demonstrated slower drift rates on proactive control trials suggesting less efficient use of cue information for proactive control. They also showed longer non-decision times than controls on infrequent stimuli sequences suggesting slower perceptual processing. An explainable machine learning analysis indicated that the hDDM parameters were able to differentiate between the groups better than conventional measures. Through DDM, we found that cognitive control deficits in psychosis are characterized by slower motor/perceptual time and slower evidence-integration primarily in proactive control.

摘要

在患有精神分裂症和其他精神病性精神障碍的个体中,认知控制缺陷一直被发现。在本分析中,我们通过分层漂移扩散模型(hDDM)描绘了精神病性精神障碍中的主动控制和反应控制缺陷。患有精神病的人(PwP;N = 123)、他们的一级亲属(N = 79)和对照组(N = 51)完成了点模式预期任务,该任务允许区分主动控制和反应控制。PwP在主动控制试验中表现出较慢的漂移率,表明在主动控制中对线索信息的利用效率较低。在不频繁的刺激序列中,他们还表现出比对照组更长的非决策时间,表明知觉处理较慢。一项可解释的机器学习分析表明,hDDM参数比传统测量方法能更好地区分不同组。通过DDM,我们发现精神病中的认知控制缺陷主要表现为主动控制中运动/知觉时间较慢和证据整合较慢。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2460/10462223/217b0adeb47c/nihpp-2023.08.14.23293891v1-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2460/10462223/27f92d416227/nihpp-2023.08.14.23293891v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2460/10462223/3bd1f87e3d65/nihpp-2023.08.14.23293891v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2460/10462223/f79193029fe0/nihpp-2023.08.14.23293891v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2460/10462223/217b0adeb47c/nihpp-2023.08.14.23293891v1-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2460/10462223/27f92d416227/nihpp-2023.08.14.23293891v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2460/10462223/3bd1f87e3d65/nihpp-2023.08.14.23293891v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2460/10462223/f79193029fe0/nihpp-2023.08.14.23293891v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2460/10462223/217b0adeb47c/nihpp-2023.08.14.23293891v1-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Clarifying Cognitive Control Deficits in Psychosis via Drift Diffusion Modeling.通过漂移扩散模型阐明精神病中的认知控制缺陷
medRxiv. 2023 Aug 16:2023.08.14.23293891. doi: 10.1101/2023.08.14.23293891.
2
Clarifying Cognitive Control Deficits in Psychosis via Drift Diffusion Modeling and Attractor Dynamics.通过漂移扩散建模和吸引子动力学澄清精神病中的认知控制缺陷。
Schizophr Bull. 2024 Nov 8;50(6):1357-1370. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae014.
3
Comparing the functional neuroanatomy of proactive and reactive control between patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls.比较精神分裂症患者与健康对照组主动控制和反应控制的功能神经解剖结构。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Feb;23(1):203-215. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01036-6. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
Cognitive deficits and enhancements in youth from adverse conditions: An integrative assessment using Drift Diffusion Modeling in the ABCD study.逆境中青少年的认知缺陷和增强:使用 ABCD 研究中的漂移扩散建模进行综合评估。
Dev Sci. 2024 Jul;27(4):e13478. doi: 10.1111/desc.13478. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
5
Motor speed does not impact the drift rate: a computational HDDM approach to differentiate cognitive and motor speed.电机速度不会影响漂移率:一种区分认知和电机速度的计算 HDDM 方法。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Jul 22;7(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00412-7.
6
Reward anticipation-related neural activation following cued reinforcement in adults with psychotic psychopathology and biological relatives.在有精神病理性精神病理学的成年人和生物学亲属中,提示强化后的奖励预期相关神经激活。
Psychol Med. 2024 May;54(7):1441-1451. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723003343. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
7
Dissecting the impact of depression on decision-making.剖析抑郁对决策的影响。
Psychol Med. 2020 Jul;50(10):1613-1622. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719001570. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
8
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alters the pattern of information processing in children with ADHD: Evidence from drift diffusion modeling.经颅直流电刺激 (tDCS) 改变 ADHD 儿童的信息处理模式:来自漂移扩散建模的证据。
Neurophysiol Clin. 2022 Feb;52(1):17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
9
HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python.HDDM:在 Python 中对 Drift-Diffusion 模型进行层次贝叶斯估计。
Front Neuroinform. 2013 Aug 2;7:14. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2013.00014. eCollection 2013.
10
A drift diffusion model analysis of age-related impact on multisensory decision-making processes.年龄对多感觉决策过程影响的漂移扩散模型分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 28;14(1):14895. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65549-5.