• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康信息采集、共享和使用原则:美国心脏协会的政策声明。

Principles for Health Information Collection, Sharing, and Use: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association.

出版信息

Circulation. 2023 Sep 26;148(13):1061-1069. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001173. Epub 2023 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001173
PMID:37646159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10912036/
Abstract

The evolution of the electronic health record, combined with advances in data curation and analytic technologies, increasingly enables data sharing and harmonization. Advances in the analysis of health-related and health-proxy information have already accelerated research discoveries and improved patient care. This American Heart Association policy statement discusses how broad data sharing can be an enabling driver of progress by providing data to develop, test, and benchmark innovative methods, scalable insights, and potential new paradigms for data storage and workflow. Along with these advances come concerns about the sensitive nature of some health data, equity considerations about the involvement of historically excluded communities, and the complex intersection of laws attempting to govern behavior. Data-sharing principles are therefore necessary across a wide swath of entities, including parties who collect health information, funders, researchers, patients, legislatures, commercial companies, and regulatory departments and agencies. This policy statement outlines some of the key equity and legal background relevant to health data sharing and responsible management. It then articulates principles that will guide the American Heart Association's engagement in public policy related to data collection, sharing, and use to continue to inform its work across the research enterprise, as well as specific examples of how these principles might be applied in the policy landscape. The goal of these principles is to improve policy to support the use or reuse of health information in ways that are respectful of patients and research participants, equitable in impact in terms of both risks and potential benefits, and beneficial across broad and demographically diverse communities in the United States.

摘要

电子健康记录的发展,结合数据管理和分析技术的进步,越来越能够实现数据共享和协调。健康相关和健康代理信息分析的进步已经加速了研究发现并改善了患者护理。本美国心脏协会政策声明讨论了广泛的数据共享如何通过提供数据来开发、测试和基准创新方法、可扩展的见解以及数据存储和工作流程的潜在新范例,成为推动进展的有利驱动因素。随着这些进步,人们对一些健康数据的敏感性、关于历史上被排除在外的社区参与的公平性考虑以及试图规范行为的法律的复杂交叉问题感到担忧。因此,数据共享原则对于包括收集健康信息的各方、资助者、研究人员、患者、立法机构、商业公司以及监管部门和机构在内的广泛实体都是必要的。本政策声明概述了与健康数据共享和负责任的管理相关的一些关键公平和法律背景。然后,它阐述了将指导美国心脏协会参与与数据收集、共享和使用相关的公共政策的原则,以继续为其在整个研究企业中的工作提供信息,并提供了这些原则在政策领域可能应用的具体示例。这些原则的目标是改善政策,以支持以尊重患者和研究参与者的方式使用或重复使用健康信息,在风险和潜在利益方面公平影响,并在美国广泛和人口多样化的社区中受益。

相似文献

1
Principles for Health Information Collection, Sharing, and Use: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association.健康信息采集、共享和使用原则:美国心脏协会的政策声明。
Circulation. 2023 Sep 26;148(13):1061-1069. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001173. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
4
NIH Consensus Statement on Management of Hepatitis C: 2002.美国国立卫生研究院关于丙型肝炎管理的共识声明:2002年。
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2002;19(3):1-46.
5
MarkVCID cerebral small vessel consortium: I. Enrollment, clinical, fluid protocols.马克 VCID 脑小血管联盟:一、入组、临床、液体方案。
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Apr;17(4):704-715. doi: 10.1002/alz.12215. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
6
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
8
NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights.美国国立卫生研究院关于剖宫产术后阴道分娩的共识发展会议声明草案:新见解
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2010 Mar 10;27(3):1-42.
9
Diagnosis and management of dental caries throughout life.一生当中龋齿的诊断与管理。
NIH Consens Statement. 2001;18(1):1-23.
10
Reducing health inequalities through general practice: a realist review and action framework.通过全科医疗减少健康不平等:一个现实主义综述和行动框架。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Mar;12(7):1-104. doi: 10.3310/YTWW7032.

引用本文的文献

1
Access to digital health technologies: personalized framework and global perspectives.数字健康技术的获取:个性化框架与全球视角。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1038/s41569-025-01184-5.
2
Patient agency and large language models in worldwide encoding of equity.全球公平编码中的患者能动性与大语言模型
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 8;8(1):258. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01598-y.
3
Data Interoperability and Harmonization in Cardiovascular Genomic and Precision Medicine.心血管基因组学与精准医学中的数据互操作性与协调统一
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2025 Jun;18(3):e004624. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.124.004624. Epub 2025 May 9.
4
Artificial Intelligence to Promote Racial and Ethnic Cardiovascular Health Equity.人工智能促进种族和族裔心血管健康公平。
Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2024 Nov;18(11):153-162. doi: 10.1007/s12170-024-00745-6. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
5
Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Cardiovascular Disease.健康的社会决定因素对心血管疾病的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 4;14(5):e039031. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039031.
6
Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Precision Medicine in Cardio-Oncology: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.人工智能助力心血管肿瘤精准医学:美国心脏协会科学声明
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2025 Apr;18(2):e000097. doi: 10.1161/HCG.0000000000000097. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
7
An institutional framework to support ethical fair and equitable artificial intelligence augmented care.一个支持符合伦理、公平且公正的人工智能辅助医疗的制度框架。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 5;8(1):84. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01490-9.
8
Beyond Size and Class Balance: Alpha as a New Dataset Quality Metric for Deep Learning.超越规模和类别平衡:Alpha作为深度学习的新数据集质量指标
ArXiv. 2024 Jul 31:arXiv:2407.15724v2.
9
Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Cardiovascular Medicine: An Attainable Promise to Improve Patient Outcomes or an Inaccessible Investment?心血管医学中的人工智能算法:是改善患者预后的可实现承诺还是难以企及的投资?
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Dec;26(12):1477-1485. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02146-y. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
10
Ethical Dimensions of Clinical Data Sharing by U.S. Health Care Organizations for Purposes beyond Direct Patient Care: Interviews with Health Care Leaders.美国医疗保健组织出于直接患者护理以外目的进行临床数据共享的伦理维度:对医疗保健领导者的访谈
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 Jan;16(1):90-100. doi: 10.1055/a-2432-0329. Epub 2024 Oct 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Leveraging electronic health records for data science: common pitfalls and how to avoid them.利用电子健康记录进行数据科学:常见陷阱及规避方法。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Dec;4(12):e893-e898. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00154-6. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
2
The inclusion of augmented intelligence in medicine: A framework for successful implementation.医学中增强型人工智能的应用:成功实施的框架。
Cell Rep Med. 2022 Jan 18;3(1):100485. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100485.
3
Bounded Justice and the Limits of Health Equity.有界的正义与健康公平的局限。
J Law Med Ethics. 2021;49(2):241-256. doi: 10.1017/jme.2021.34.
4
Rising to the challenge of bias in health care AI.应对医疗保健 AI 中的偏见挑战。
Nat Med. 2021 Dec;27(12):2079-2081. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01577-2.
5
Respecting Autonomy And Enabling Diversity: The Effect Of Eligibility And Enrollment On Research Data Demographics.尊重自主性和多样性:资格和注册对研究数据人口统计的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Dec;40(12):1892-1899. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01197.
6
The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after passage.超过十年来,人们对《遗传信息非歧视法案》(GINA)一直缺乏了解和误解。
Genet Med. 2021 Dec;23(12):2324-2334. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01268-w. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
7
The genomics workforce must become more diverse: a strategic imperative.基因组学劳动力必须更加多样化:这是一项战略要务。
Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Jan 7;108(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.12.013.
8
Governance of a Learning Health Care System for Oncology: Patient Recommendations.肿瘤学学习型医疗保健系统治理:患者建议。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Apr;17(4):e479-e489. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00454. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
9
Geographic Distribution of US Cohorts Used to Train Deep Learning Algorithms.美国用于训练深度学习算法的队列的地理分布。
JAMA. 2020 Sep 22;324(12):1212-1213. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12067.
10
Artificial intelligence in health care: accountability and safety.人工智能在医疗保健中的应用:责任与安全。
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Apr 1;98(4):251-256. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.237487. Epub 2020 Feb 25.