Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, Zurich 8008, Switzerland.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2024 Jan;222(1):e2329765. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29765. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT may allow lower radiation doses than used for conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT, with preserved image quality. The purpose of this study was to compare PCD CT and EID CT, reconstructed with and without a denoising tool, in terms of image quality of the osseous pelvis in a phantom, with attention to low radiation doses. A pelvic phantom comprising human bones in acrylic material mimicking soft tissue underwent PCD CT and EID CT at various tube potentials and radiation doses ranging from 0.05 to 5.00 mGy. Additional denoised reconstructions were generated using a commercial tool. Noise was measured in the acrylic material. Two readers performed independent qualitative assessments that entailed determining the denoised EID CT reconstruction with the lowest acceptable dose and then comparing this reference reconstruction with PCD CT reconstructions without and with denoising, using subjective Likert scales. Noise was lower for PCD CT than for EID CT. For instance, at 0.05 mGy and 100 kV with tin filter, noise was 38.4 HU for PCD CT versus 48.8 HU for EID CT. Denoising further reduced noise; for example, for PCD CT at 100 kV with tin filter at 0.25 mGy, noise was 19.9 HU without denoising versus 9.7 HU with denoising. For both readers, lowest acceptable dose for EID CT was 0.10 mGy (total score, 11 of 15 for both readers). Both readers somewhat agreed that PCD CT without denoising at 0.10 mGy (reflecting reference reconstruction dose) was relatively better than the reference reconstruction in terms of osseous structures, artifacts, and image quality. Both readers also somewhat agreed that denoised PCD CT reconstructions at 0.10 mGy and 0.05 mGy (reflecting matched and lower doses, respectively, with respect to reference reconstruction dose) were relatively better than the reference reconstruction for the image quality measures. PCD CT showed better-quality images than EID CT when performed at the lowest acceptable radiation dose for EID CT. PCD CT with denoising yielded better-quality images at a dose lower than lowest acceptable dose for EID CT. PCD CT with denoising could facilitate lower radiation doses for pelvic imaging.
光子计数探测器 (PCD) CT 与传统能量积分探测器 (EID) CT 相比,在保持图像质量的前提下,可使用更低的辐射剂量。本研究旨在比较 PCD CT 和 EID CT 在骨盆腔成像方面的图像质量,关注低剂量情况。一个包含人体骨骼的骨盆模型采用丙烯酸材料模拟软组织,分别在不同的管电压和辐射剂量下进行 PCD CT 和 EID CT 检查,辐射剂量范围为 0.05 至 5.00 mGy。还使用一种商用工具生成了额外的去噪重建。在丙烯酸材料中测量了噪声。两位读者进行了独立的定性评估,他们确定了 EID CT 去噪重建中可接受的最低剂量,然后使用主观李克特量表将该参考重建与无去噪和有去噪的 PCD CT 重建进行比较。PCD CT 的噪声低于 EID CT。例如,在 0.05 mGy 和 100 kV 加锡滤过器时,PCD CT 的噪声为 38.4 HU,而 EID CT 的噪声为 48.8 HU。去噪进一步降低了噪声;例如,在 0.05 mGy 加锡滤过器 100 kV 时,PCD CT 无去噪时的噪声为 19.9 HU,而有去噪时的噪声为 9.7 HU。对于两位读者,EID CT 可接受的最低剂量为 0.10 mGy(总分,两位读者均为 15 分中的 11 分)。两位读者都认为,在 0.10 mGy 时,无去噪的 PCD CT(反映参考重建剂量)在骨结构、伪影和图像质量方面相对优于参考重建。两位读者还认为,在 0.10 mGy 和 0.05 mGy 时(分别反映匹配和低于参考重建剂量的剂量),去噪的 PCD CT 重建图像质量指标也相对优于参考重建。在 EID CT 可接受的最低辐射剂量下,PCD CT 比 EID CT 生成的图像质量更好。在低于 EID CT 可接受的最低剂量时,去噪的 PCD CT 生成的图像质量更好。对于骨盆成像,去噪的 PCD CT 可以降低辐射剂量。