Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Diabetes Care. 2023 Nov 1;46(11):1997-2003. doi: 10.2337/dc23-0312.
It is not known if incidence rates for diabetic distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN) are decreasing, as they are for other diabetic complications. Here, we investigated incidence rates of DSPN in type 1 and type 2 diabetes in a large population-based study.
In the period 1996 to 2018, 19,342 individuals were identified at a Danish tertiary diabetes center. Vibration perception threshold was assessed by biothesiometry and repeated throughout the study. Exclusion of prevalent DSPN cases or missing data left data on 9,473 individuals for analysis of DSPN using a cutoff of >25 V and on 2,783 individuals for analysis using an age-, sex-, and height-specific cutoff. Poisson regression analysis was used to model incidence rates of DSPN for both cutoff types and separately for diabetes types. Covariates were sex, age, diabetes duration, and calendar time.
Incidence rates (95% CI) of DSPN decreased from 1996 to 2018 (e.g., from 4.78 [3.60-6.33]/100 person-years [PY] to 1.15 [0.91-1.47]/100 PY for 40-year-old men with type 1 diabetes and from 16.54 [11.80-23.18]/100 PY to 8.02 [6.63-9.69]/100 PY for 60-year-old men with type 2 diabetes, when using >25 V as the cutoff value). Analyses using age-, sex-, and height-specific cutoff values demonstrated similar incidence patterns by calendar time without sex differences. For type 1 diabetes, decreasing incidence rates were seen with older age.
Incidence rates for DSPN are declining in type 1 and type 2 diabetes, possibly due to improved diabetes treatment. This causality remains to be explored. Distinct age-related patterns indicate that the pathophysiology of DSPN may differ between diabetes types.
目前尚不清楚糖尿病远端对称性多发性神经病变(DSPN)的发病率是否在下降,就像其他糖尿病并发症一样。在这里,我们在一项大型基于人群的研究中调查了 1 型和 2 型糖尿病中 DSPN 的发病率。
在 1996 年至 2018 年期间,在丹麦一家三级糖尿病中心确定了 19342 名患者。通过生物感觉阈值测定法评估振动感觉阈值,并在整个研究过程中反复进行评估。排除已患 DSPN 的患者或缺失数据后,共有 9473 名患者的数据可用于使用 >25V 的截止值分析 DSPN,2783 名患者的数据可用于使用年龄、性别和身高特异性截止值分析 DSPN。使用泊松回归分析分别针对两种截止值和两种糖尿病类型建模 DSPN 的发病率。协变量为性别、年龄、糖尿病病程和日历时间。
发病率(95%CI)从 1996 年到 2018 年降低(例如,对于 40 岁的 1 型糖尿病男性,发病率从 4.78[3.60-6.33]/100 人年[PY]降至 1.15[0.91-1.47]/100 PY,对于 60 岁的 2 型糖尿病男性,发病率从 16.54[11.80-23.18]/100 PY 降至 8.02[6.63-9.69]/100 PY),当使用 >25V 作为截止值时。使用年龄、性别和身高特异性截止值的分析表明,随着时间的推移,发病率模式相似,没有性别差异。对于 1 型糖尿病,发病率随着年龄的增长而降低。
1 型和 2 型糖尿病中 DSPN 的发病率正在下降,这可能是由于糖尿病治疗的改善。这种因果关系仍有待探讨。不同的与年龄相关的模式表明,DSPN 的病理生理学可能在不同的糖尿病类型之间有所不同。