Individuals and (Synthetic) Data Points: Using Value-Sensitive Design to Foster Ethical Deliberations on Epistemic Transitions.
作者信息
Bélisle-Pipon Jean-Christophe, Ravitsky Vardit, Bensoussan Yael
机构信息
Simon Fraser University.
Harvard Medical School.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(9):69-72. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2237436.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Individuals and (Synthetic) Data Points: Using Value-Sensitive Design to Foster Ethical Deliberations on Epistemic Transitions.个人与（合成）数据点：运用价值敏感设计促进关于认知转变的伦理思考。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(9):69-72. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2237436.
2
Putting "Epistemic Injustice" to Work in Bioethics: Beyond Nonmaleficence.将“认知不公正”付诸于生物伦理学实践：超越不伤害。
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Jun;21(2):225-228. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10314-y. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
3
Ethical and epistemic issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trials.实用型阶梯式群组随机临床试验设计与实施中的伦理和认识问题。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Apr;115:106703. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106703. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
4
Design publicity of black box algorithms: a support to the epistemic and ethical justifications of medical AI systems.黑盒算法的设计宣传：对医疗人工智能系统的认知和伦理辩护的支持。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Jul;48(7):492-494. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107482. Epub 2021 May 12.
5
Refining Value Sensitive Design: A (Capability-Based) Procedural Ethics Approach to Technological Design for Well-Being.细化价值敏感设计：一种（基于能力的）程序伦理方法，用于为福祉进行技术设计。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Oct;26(5):2629-2662. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00223-3. Epub 2020 May 18.
6
In search of epistemic justice. Dialogical reflection of researchers on situated ethics in studies with people living with language and/or cognitive impairment.追寻认识论正义。与语言和/或认知障碍患者一起开展研究中，研究人员对情境伦理的对话性反思。
J Aging Stud. 2023 Sep;66:101154. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101154. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
7
Value-creation in the health data domain: a typology of what health data help us do.健康数据领域的价值创造：健康数据助我们达成之事的类型划分
Biosocieties. 2022 Apr 12:1-25. doi: 10.1057/s41292-022-00276-6.
8
How to evaluate the quality of an ethical deliberation? A pragmatist proposal for evaluation criteria and collaborative research.如何评估伦理审议的质量？评估标准和协作研究的实用主义建议。
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Sep;25(3):309-326. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10091-2. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
9
Clinical Ethics Consultation in Chronic Illness: Challenging Epistemic Injustice Through Epistemic Modesty.慢性疾病的临床伦理咨询：通过认知谦逊应对认知不公正。
HEC Forum. 2024 Jun;36(2):131-145. doi: 10.1007/s10730-022-09494-8. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
10
Mechanisms of Epistemic Change-Under Which Circumstances Does Diverging Information Support Epistemic Development?认知变化机制——在哪些情况下不同的信息会支持认知发展？
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 22;9:2278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02278. eCollection 2018.
引用本文的文献
1
Tempered enthusiasm by interviewed experts for synthetic data and ELSI checklists for AI in medicine.受访专家对医学人工智能合成数据和伦理、法律与社会影响（ELSI）清单的热情有所降温。
AI Ethics. 2025;5(3):3241-3254. doi: 10.1007/s43681-024-00652-x. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
2
Stakeholder perspectives on ethical and trustworthy voice AI in health care.医疗保健领域中利益相关者对符合伦理道德且值得信赖的语音人工智能的看法。
Digit Health. 2024 Jul 23;10:20552076241260407. doi: 10.1177/20552076241260407. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Exploring the role of AI in classifying, analyzing, and generating case reports on assisted suicide cases: feasibility and ethical implications.探索人工智能在对协助自杀案例进行分类、分析和生成案例报告中的作用：可行性与伦理意义。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Dec 14;6:1328865. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1328865. eCollection 2023.
4
Generative AI, Specific Moral Values: A Closer Look at ChatGPT's New Ethical Implications for Medical AI.生成式人工智能、特定道德价值观：深入探讨ChatGPT对医学人工智能的新伦理影响。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Oct;23(10):65-68. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2250311. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
本文引用的文献
1
Specific challenges posed by artificial intelligence in research ethics.人工智能在研究伦理方面带来的具体挑战。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Jul 6;6:1149082. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1149082. eCollection 2023.
2
Epistemic Rights and Responsibilities of Digital Simulacra for Biomedicine.数字模拟物在生物医学中的认知权利和责任。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(9):43-54. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2146785. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
3
Gauging Stakeholder Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Gender-Affirming Voice Care.评估利益相关者对性别肯定性语音护理中人工智能的看法。
Laryngoscope. 2023 Jul;133(7):1698-1705. doi: 10.1002/lary.30406. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
4
What Makes Artificial Intelligence Exceptional in Health Technology Assessment?是什么让人工智能在卫生技术评估中脱颖而出？
Front Artif Intell. 2021 Nov 2;4:736697. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.736697. eCollection 2021.
5
Black Boxes and Bias in AI Challenge Autonomy.
Am J Bioeth. 2021 Jul;21(7):33-35. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1926587.
6
Science Without Conscience Is but the Ruin of the Soul: The Ethics of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Perioperative Medicine.科学若丧失良知，将沦为灵魂的毁灭者：围手术期医学中大数据和人工智能的伦理。
Anesth Analg. 2020 May;130(5):1234-1243. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004728.
Zotero 插件