Edwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Knowledge Translation Program, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 30;13(8):e074276. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074276.
To conduct a qualitative study, guided by the principles of community-based participatory research, with the following objectives: (1) to provide a conceptual framework describing the drivers of son preference; (2) to understand experiences of son preference among Punjabi-Canadians and (3) with this understanding, identify and co-design an appropriate educational tool.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, METHODS: Qualitative study consisting of four bilingual (Punjabi and English) focus group discussions with 11 mothers, 4 fathers and 17 grandmothers in Toronto and Brampton, Canada. Participants were queried about experiences and perspectives related to reproductive decision-making, gender equity and son preference, and for appropriate approaches to reducing inequities. Transcripts were simultaneously translated and written in English and thematic analysis was conducted. An infoposter was identified as a feasible educational tool and was co-designed by researchers and community partners.
Participants identified patrilocality (ie, married sons reside with parents, married daughters with in-laws) and patrilineality (ie, sons inherit assets, daughters' husband receives a dowry) as structural precursors to proximal drivers (ie, old-age security) of son preference. Mothers' and grandmothers' value to their families depended strongly on having a son but did not guarantee security. Pressures (ie, internalised discrimination, reproductive coercion) to conceive a son were common after the birth of at least one daughter in the absence of sons. Participants did not know anyone who had a sex selective abortion in Canada; however, traditional sex selection methods (eg, herbal medicines) were mentioned. Our co-designed infoposter entitled 'Truths About Son Preference' addressed three misconceptions identified in discussions.
This study may be useful to health and social care providers in providing structurally competent and culturally humble counselling and care, particularly after the birth of daughters in the absence of sons. Community engagement is necessary for future intervention development.
本研究旨在采用社区参与式研究方法,从以下三个目标开展定性研究:(1)提供描述男孩偏好驱动因素的概念框架;(2)了解加拿大旁遮普人的男孩偏好体验;(3)在此基础上,确定并共同设计合适的教育工具。
设计、地点、参与者、方法:在加拿大多伦多和布兰普顿,我们进行了一项由 4 个双语(旁遮普语和英语)焦点小组讨论组成的定性研究,参与者包括 11 位母亲、4 位父亲和 17 位祖母。我们询问了参与者有关生殖决策、性别平等和男孩偏好的经验和观点,并探讨了减少不平等的适当方法。同时将转录本翻译成英文,并进行主题分析。确定信息海报作为一种可行的教育工具,并由研究人员和社区合作伙伴共同设计。
参与者认为父居制(已婚儿子与父母同住,已婚女儿与公婆同住)和父系继嗣制(儿子继承财产,女儿的丈夫得到嫁妆)是男孩偏好的近端驱动因素(即老年保障)的结构前体。母亲和祖母对家庭的重视程度强烈取决于儿子的存在,但这并不能保证安全。在没有儿子的情况下,至少生育了一个女儿后,通常会面临要儿子的压力(即内化的歧视、生殖胁迫)。参与者在加拿大没有人知道有人进行过性别选择性流产;然而,他们提到了传统的性别选择方法(例如,草药)。我们共同设计的题为“关于男孩偏好的真相”的信息海报解决了讨论中确定的三个误解。
本研究可能对卫生和社会保健提供者在缺乏儿子的情况下,为女儿出生后提供结构上有能力和文化上谦逊的咨询和护理有用。需要社区参与才能为未来的干预措施开发提供支持。