School of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Jan 19;33(2):98-108. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016001.
In many quality improvement (QI) and other complex interventions, assessing the fidelity with which participants 'enact' intervention activities (ie, implement them as intended) is underexplored. Adapting the evaluative approach used in objective structured clinical examinations, we aimed to develop and validate a practical approach to assessing fidelity enactment-the Overall Fidelity Enactment Scale for Complex Interventions (OFES-CI).
We developed the OFES-CI to evaluate enactment of the SCOPE QI intervention, which teaches nursing home teams to use plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles. The OFES-CI was piloted and revised early in SCOPE with good inter-rater reliability, so we proceeded with a single rater. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess inter-rater reliability. For 27 SCOPE teams, we used ICC to compare two methods for assessing fidelity enactment: (1) OFES-CI ratings provided by one of five trained experts who observed structured 6 min PDSA progress presentations made at the end of SCOPE, (2) average rating of two coders' deductive content analysis of qualitative process evaluation data collected during the final 3 months of SCOPE (our gold standard).
Using Cicchetti's classification, inter-rater reliability between two coders who derived the gold standard enactment score was 'excellent' (ICC=0.93, 95% CI=0.85 to 0.97). Inter-rater reliability between the OFES-CI and the gold standard was good (ICC=0.71, 95% CI=0.46 to 0.86), after removing one team where open-text comments were discrepant with the rating. Rater feedback suggests the OFES-CI has strong face validity and positive implementation qualities (acceptability, easy to use, low training requirements).
The OFES-CI provides a promising novel approach for assessing fidelity enactment in QI and other complex interventions. It demonstrates good reliability against our gold standard assessment approach and addresses the practicality problem in fidelity assessment by virtue of its suitable implementation qualities. Steps for adapting the OFES-CI to other complex interventions are offered.
在许多质量改进(QI)和其他复杂干预措施中,评估参与者“实施”干预措施的忠实程度(即按计划实施)的方法研究不足。本研究借鉴客观结构化临床考试中使用的评估方法,旨在开发和验证一种评估忠实度实施的实用方法——复杂干预措施整体忠实度实施量表(OFES-CI)。
我们开发了 OFES-CI 来评估 SCOPE QI 干预措施的实施情况,该干预措施教导养老院团队使用计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)循环。OFES-CI 在 SCOPE 的早期进行了试点和修订,具有良好的评分者间可靠性,因此我们采用了单一评分者。采用组内相关系数(ICC)评估评分者间可靠性。对于 27 个 SCOPE 团队,我们使用 ICC 比较了两种评估忠实度实施的方法:(1)OFES-CI 评分由 5 名接受过培训的专家中的 1 名提供,他们观察了 SCOPE 结束时进行的 6 分钟结构化 PDSA 进展演示,(2)对 SCOPE 最后 3 个月收集的定性过程评估数据进行的两位编码员的演绎内容分析的平均评分(我们的金标准)。
根据 Cicchetti 的分类,两位得出金标准实施评分的编码员之间的评分者间可靠性为“优秀”(ICC=0.93,95%CI=0.85 至 0.97)。OFES-CI 与金标准之间的可靠性良好(ICC=0.71,95%CI=0.46 至 0.86),但在剔除了一个评分与评论存在差异的团队后。评分者的反馈表明,OFES-CI 具有很强的表面有效性和积极的实施质量(可接受性、易于使用、低培训要求)。
OFES-CI 为 QI 和其他复杂干预措施中的忠实度实施评估提供了一种有前途的新方法。它与我们的金标准评估方法具有良好的可靠性,并通过其合适的实施质量解决了忠实度评估的实用性问题。还提供了将 OFES-CI 应用于其他复杂干预措施的步骤。