• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子评估:开发一种客观结构化评估报告工具的电子版,以简化对录像讲评的评估。

eAssessment: development of an electronic version of the Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing tool to streamline evaluation of video recorded debriefings.

机构信息

Department of Cardiopulmonary Science, LSU Health New Orleans School of Allied Health Professions, 1900 Gravier Street, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, USA.

Department of Social Medicine, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitoria, ES 29043-900, Brazil.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Oct 1;25(10):1284-1291. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy113.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocy113
PMID:30299477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7646921/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing (OSAD) is an evidence-based, 8-item tool that uses a behaviorally anchored rating scale in paper-based form to evaluate the quality of debriefing in medical education. The objective of this project was twofold: 1) to create an easy-to-use electronic format of the OSAD (eOSAD) in order to streamline data entry; and 2) to pilot its use on videoed debriefings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The eOSAD was developed in collaboration with the LSU Health New Orleans Epidemiology Data Center using SurveyGizmo (Widgix Software, LLC, Boulder, CO, USA) software. The eOSAD was then piloted by 2 trained evaluators who rated 37 videos of faculty teams conducting pre-briefing and debriefing after a high-fidelity trauma simulation. Inter-rater reliability was assessed, and evaluators' qualitative feedback was obtained.

RESULTS

Inter-rater reliability was good [prebrief, intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.955 (95% CI, 0.912-0.977), P < .001; debrief, ICC = 0.853 (95% CI, 0.713-0.924), P < .001]. Qualitative feedback from evaluators found that the eOSAD was easy to complete, simple to read and add comments, and reliably stored data that were readily retrievable, enabling the smooth dissemination of information collected.

DISCUSSION

The eOSAD features a secure login, sharable internet access link for distant evaluators, and the immediate exporting of data into a secure database for future analysis. It provided convenience for end-users, produced reliable assessments among independent evaluators, and eliminated multiple sources of possible data corruption.

CONCLUSION

The eOSAD tool format advances the post debriefing evaluation of videoed inter-professional team training in high-fidelity simulation.

摘要

目的

客观结构化讨论评估(OSAD)是一种基于证据的 8 项工具,它采用纸笔形式的行为锚定评分量表,评估医学教育中的讨论质量。该项目的目的有两个:1)创建 OSAD 的易用电子格式(eOSAD),以简化数据录入;2)在视频讨论中试用。

材料与方法

eOSAD 由 LSU 健康新奥尔良流行病学数据中心与 SurveyGizmo(Widgix Software,LLC,美国科罗拉多州博尔德)软件合作开发。然后,由 2 名经过培训的评估员对 37 个教师团队在高保真度创伤模拟后进行预讨论和讨论的视频进行试点评估。评估了组内相关系数(ICC)的信度,并获得了评估员的定性反馈。

结果

ICC 评估者间信度良好[预讨论,ICC = 0.955(95%CI,0.912-0.977),P<0.001;讨论,ICC = 0.853(95%CI,0.713-0.924),P<0.001]。评估员的定性反馈发现,eOSAD 易于完成、易于阅读和添加评论、可靠地存储数据,且易于检索,从而顺利传播了收集到的信息。

讨论

eOSAD 具有安全登录、为远程评估员提供共享互联网访问链接,以及将数据立即导出到安全数据库以进行未来分析的功能。它为最终用户提供了便利,在独立评估员之间产生了可靠的评估结果,并消除了数据损坏的多个潜在来源。

结论

eOSAD 工具格式推进了高保真模拟中的视频跨专业团队培训后的讨论评估。

相似文献

1
eAssessment: development of an electronic version of the Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing tool to streamline evaluation of video recorded debriefings.电子评估:开发一种客观结构化评估报告工具的电子版,以简化对录像讲评的评估。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Oct 1;25(10):1284-1291. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy113.
2
Quality with quantity? Evaluating interprofessional faculty prebriefs and debriefs for simulation training using video.质量与数量?使用视频评估模拟培训中的跨专业教员预讲和讲评。
Surgery. 2019 Jun;165(6):1069-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
3
Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing (OSAD) in simulation-based medical education: Translation and validation of the German version.基于模拟的医学教育中的客观结构化临床考试(OSCE):德语文本的翻译与验证。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244816. eCollection 2020.
4
Objective structured assessment of debriefing: bringing science to the art of debriefing in surgery.客观结构化评估的反思:将科学引入手术反思的艺术中。
Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):982-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182610c91.
5
Validation evidence of the paediatric Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing (OSAD) tool.儿童客观结构化汇报评估(OSAD)工具的验证证据。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2016 May 24;2(3):61-67. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000017. eCollection 2016.
6
Quality of interdisciplinary postsimulation debriefing: 360° evaluation.跨学科模拟后汇报的质量:360°评估
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):9-16. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000125. eCollection 2017.
7
Operation debrief: a SHARP improvement in performance feedback in the operating room.手术汇报:手术室绩效反馈的显著改善
Ann Surg. 2013 Dec;258(6):958-63. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828c88fc.
8
Brick in the wall? Linking quality of debriefing to participant learning in team training of interprofessional students.墙上的砖头?在跨专业学生团队培训中将汇报质量与参与者学习联系起来。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2021 Jan 27;7(5):360-365. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000685. eCollection 2021.
9
Does a Written Tool to Guide Structured Debriefing Improve Discourse? Implications for Interprofessional Team Simulation.书面工具引导结构化讨论是否能提高讨论效果?对跨专业团队模拟的启示。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Nov;75(6):e240-e245. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
10
Improvement in student-led debriefing analysis after simulation-based team training using a revised teamwork assessment tool.使用经过修订的团队评估工具后,基于模拟的团队培训中学生主导的汇报分析得到改善。
Surgery. 2021 Dec;170(6):1659-1664. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.06.014. Epub 2021 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying a video recording, video-based rating method in OSCEs.应用视频记录、基于视频的评分方法于 OSCE 中。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2187949. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2187949.
2
Pilot study of the DART tool - an objective healthcare simulation debriefing assessment instrument.DART 工具的初步研究——一种客观的医疗保健模拟讲评评估工具。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 22;22(1):636. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03697-w.
3
Brick in the wall? Linking quality of debriefing to participant learning in team training of interprofessional students.墙上的砖头?在跨专业学生团队培训中将汇报质量与参与者学习联系起来。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2021 Jan 27;7(5):360-365. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000685. eCollection 2021.
4
Immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams.使用汇报时间数据和对话图进行即时教师反馈。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Mar 7;7(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00203-6.
5
Translation of the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare in Portuguese and cross-cultural adaptation for Portugal and Brazil.《医疗保健模拟情况汇报评估》葡萄牙语翻译及针对葡萄牙和巴西的跨文化调适
Adv Simul (Lond). 2021 Jul 7;6(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s41077-021-00175-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation evidence of the paediatric Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing (OSAD) tool.儿童客观结构化汇报评估(OSAD)工具的验证证据。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2016 May 24;2(3):61-67. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000017. eCollection 2016.
2
Development of an Instrument to Assess the Clinical Effectiveness of the Debriefer in Simulation Education.一种用于评估模拟教育中汇报者临床效果的工具的开发。
J Allied Health. 2016 Fall;45(3):191-8.
3
Tips for Conducting the Pre-Brief for a Simulation.模拟预简报的开展要点。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2016 Aug 1;47(8):353-5. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20160715-05.
4
Development of a tool to improve performance debriefing and learning: the paediatric Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing (OSAD) tool.开发一种提高表现汇报与学习效果的工具:儿科客观结构化汇报评估(OSAD)工具。
Postgrad Med J. 2014 Nov;90(1069):613-21. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131676. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
5
Getting a head start: high-fidelity, simulation-based operating room team training of interprofessional students.提前起步:基于高保真模拟的跨专业学生手术室团队培训。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jan;218(1):140-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.09.006. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
6
Development of a team performance scale to assess undergraduate health professionals.团队绩效评估量表的制定,以评估本科卫生专业人员。
Acad Med. 2013 Jul;88(7):989-96. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318294fd45.
7
Interprofessional education in team communication: working together to improve patient safety.团队沟通中的跨专业教育:携手合作以提高患者安全。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 May;22(5):414-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000952. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
8
Undergraduate students' perceptions of and attitudes toward a simulation-based interprofessional curriculum: the KidSIM ATTITUDES questionnaire.本科学生对基于模拟的跨专业课程的看法和态度:KidSIM 态度问卷。
Simul Healthc. 2012 Dec;7(6):353-8. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318264499e.
9
Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare: development and psychometric properties.医疗模拟中的汇报评估:制定与心理测量学特性。
Simul Healthc. 2012 Oct;7(5):288-94. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182620228.
10
Objective structured assessment of debriefing: bringing science to the art of debriefing in surgery.客观结构化评估的反思:将科学引入手术反思的艺术中。
Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):982-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182610c91.