Campbell Belinda A, Dobos Gabor, Haider Zahra, Prince H Miles, Bagot Martine, Evison Felicity, van der Weyden Carrie, McCormack Chris, Ram-Wolff Caroline, Miladi Maryam, Scarisbrick Julia J
Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Blood Adv. 2023 Nov 14;7(21):6639-6647. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011041.
Despite increasing availability of therapies, patients with Sezary syndrome (SS) commonly endure multi-line treatment journeys, mostly with partial responses of short duration. Measuring clinical benefit is challenging; time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) provides a robust, objective measurement of efficacy. This international observational study examines patterns of clinical care and therapeutic benefit as measured by TTNT. TTNT was calculated for monotherapies and combination therapies, with consideration to treatment line. 178 patients with SS (73% de novo, 27% secondary) were included, receiving 721 lines of systemic therapy, with median follow-up of 56.9 months. Across all lines, 58 different therapeutic regimens were prescribed (54 were systemic therapies) and classified into 17 treatment groups. The most common first-line treatments were extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP)-containing combination therapy (20%) and retinoid monotherapy (19%). Median TTNT for all first-line therapies was short (5.4 months). First-line, combination therapies had longer median TTNT than monotherapies, 10.0 vs 5.0 months (P = .004), respectively. Later delivery of combination therapies was associated with shorter clinical benefit, with median TTNT reduced to 6.2 and 2.2 months for mid-line (2nd-4th line) and late-line (≥5th line), respectively (P < .001). First-line ECP-containing treatments were associated with longer median TTNT than non-ECP-containing treatments, 9.0 vs 4.9 months (P = .007). For both ECP-monotherapy and ECP-containing combination therapy, significant reductions in TTNT were seen in later lines. These data suggest therapeutic benefit from first-line delivery of combination therapy for SS and favor early inclusion of ECP in the treatment algorithm for those who can access it.
尽管治疗方法越来越多,但塞扎里综合征(SS)患者通常要经历多线治疗过程,大多数情况下疗效只是短期部分缓解。衡量临床获益具有挑战性;下次治疗时间(TTNT)提供了一种可靠、客观的疗效测量方法。这项国际观察性研究考察了以TTNT衡量的临床护理模式和治疗获益情况。计算了单药治疗和联合治疗的TTNT,并考虑了治疗线数。纳入了178例SS患者(73%为初发,27%为继发),接受了721线全身治疗,中位随访时间为56.9个月。在所有治疗线中,共开出了58种不同的治疗方案(54种为全身治疗),并分为17个治疗组。最常见的一线治疗是含体外光化学疗法(ECP)的联合治疗(20%)和维甲酸单药治疗(19%)。所有一线治疗的中位TTNT较短(5.4个月)。一线联合治疗的中位TTNT比单药治疗更长,分别为10.0个月和5.0个月(P = 0.004)。联合治疗较晚应用与临床获益较短相关,中线(第2 - 4线)和晚期(≥第5线)联合治疗的中位TTNT分别降至6.2个月和2.2个月(P < 0.001)。一线含ECP的治疗比不含ECP的治疗中位TTNT更长,分别为9.0个月和4.9个月(P = 0.007)。对于ECP单药治疗和含ECP的联合治疗,在后续治疗线中TTNT均显著缩短。这些数据表明,SS一线应用联合治疗具有治疗获益,并且对于能够接受的患者,支持在治疗方案中尽早加入ECP。