Thejasri Keerthipati, Singaraju Gowri Sankar, Marya Anand, Priyanka J S Yamini, Shaik Shajin, Mandava Prasad
Department of Orthodontics, Narayana Dental College, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh, 12211, Cambodia.
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Oct;27(10):6015-6026. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05215-8. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
An effective space opening for band placement with minimal pain and gingival inflammation is a prime requisite during fixed orthodontic procedures. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two types of separators, elastomeric and Kansal, in the amount of space opening, pain perception elicited, and gingival inflammation.
A random split-mouth study was designed with 30 subjects undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. Two different separators (Elastomer and Kansal) were placed alternatively on the left and right sides around the mesial and distal sides of the first molars in the mandibular arch of each subject. After 3 days, the amount of separation after 3 days was assessed with a leaf gauge on both mesial and distal sides. The subjective pain perception by visual analog Scale (VAS) at different points and during different functions for each of the 3 days was evaluated. A self-filled chart was utilized to be performed by the patients. Gingival index was used to assess the inflammatory changes.
The most significant amount of separation (0.28 mm) was found with elastomers on the mesial side and is statistically significant (p < 0.001) compared to the mesial side (0.18 mm). The Kansal separators produced equivalent separation on mesial (0.19 mm) and distal sites (0.17 mm). The highest pain score was found after 24 h with elastomeric separators (median-40) for chewing and biting and the least for sleep (median-30). There is a statistical difference of pain perception between elastomers and Kansal separators at different points for the given function (p < 0.001). Both the separators resulted in mild gingival index of score less than 1 (0.70 ± 0.65, 0.97 ± 0.720, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two types of separators.
Both the separators produced adequate separation after a minimum 3 days. Kansal produces minimum discomfort and pain compared to elastomeric separators. Mild gingival inflammation was observed with both the separators.
在固定正畸治疗过程中,为放置带环创造有效的间隙,同时使疼痛和牙龈炎症降至最低,这是一项基本要求。本研究旨在比较两种类型的分离器,即弹性体分离器和坎萨尔分离器,在间隙开辟量、引发的疼痛感知以及牙龈炎症方面的效果。
设计了一项随机双盲研究,有30名接受固定正畸治疗的受试者参与。在每位受试者下颌牙弓第一磨牙的近中侧和远中侧周围,左右两侧交替放置两种不同的分离器(弹性体分离器和坎萨尔分离器)。3天后,用叶片规评估近中侧和远中侧3天后的间隙量。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估在不同时间点以及3天内不同功能状态下的主观疼痛感知。患者需填写一份自填式表格。使用牙龈指数评估炎症变化。
在近中侧,弹性体分离器产生的间隙量最大(0.28毫米),与近中侧(0.188毫米)相比具有统计学显著性(p < 0.001)。坎萨尔分离器在近中侧(0.19毫米)和远中侧(0.17毫米)产生的间隙量相当。弹性体分离器在24小时后咀嚼和咬时的疼痛评分最高(中位数为40),睡眠时最低(中位数为30)。在给定功能的不同时间点,弹性体分离器和坎萨尔分离器之间的疼痛感知存在统计学差异(p < 0.001)。两种分离器导致的牙龈指数均为轻度,评分均小于1(0.70±0.65,0.97±0.720),两种类型的分离器之间无统计学显著差异。
两种分离器在至少3天后都能产生足够的间隙。与弹性体分离器相比,坎萨尔分离器产生的不适和疼痛最小。两种分离器均观察到轻度牙龈炎症。