Suppr超能文献

正畸治疗患者中弹性和弹簧分离器引起的疼痛与不适

Pain and distress induced by elastomeric and spring separators in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.

作者信息

Al-Balbeesi Hana O, Bin Huraib Sahar M, AlNahas Nadia W, AlKawari Huda M, Abu-Amara Abdulrahman B, Vellappally Sajith, Anil Sukumaran

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 Nov-Dec;6(6):549-553. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.195519.

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The objective of the present investigation is to evaluate patients' pain perception and discomfort, the duration of pain and the level of self-medication over time during tooth separation, and the effectiveness of elastomeric and spring types of orthodontic separators in Saudi population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study group consisted of 30 female adolescent patients who had elastomeric/spring separators as part of their orthodontic treatment. A self-administrated questionnaire comprising 16 multiple choice questions and another with visual analog scale were used to record the patient's pain perceptions at 4 hours, 24 hours, 3 days, 5 days, and 7 days from the time of insertion. The level of pain and discomfort during these time periods were assessed by a visual analog scale. After a separation period of 7 days, the amount of separation was measured with a leaf gauge. Type and frequency of analgesic consumption was also recorded. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 (IBM SPSS -Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.,) was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The data showed significant increase in the level of pain at 4 hours, 24 hours, and 3 days from separator placement. The elastomeric separators produced significantly more separation than the spring separators and also caused maximum pain during the first 3 days after insertion. However, there was no significant difference between the score of pain between two separators at all time intervals.

CONCLUSION

Both elastomeric and spring separators showed comparative levels of pain and discomfort during the early phase of separation. Elastomeric separators were found to be more effective in tooth separation than spring separators. However, further studies are necessary to substantiate this preliminary observation.

摘要

目的与目标

本研究的目的是评估在牙齿分离过程中患者随时间推移的疼痛感知与不适、疼痛持续时间和自我用药水平,以及弹性体和弹簧式正畸分离器在沙特人群中的有效性。

材料与方法

研究组由30名女性青少年患者组成,她们在正畸治疗中使用了弹性体/弹簧分离器。使用一份包含16个多项选择题的自填式问卷和另一份视觉模拟量表来记录患者在插入分离器后4小时、24小时、3天、5天和7天的疼痛感知。这些时间段内的疼痛和不适程度通过视觉模拟量表进行评估。在分离7天后,用叶片规测量分离量。还记录了镇痛药物的使用类型和频率。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)20版(IBM SPSS -芝加哥,伊利诺伊州:SPSS公司)进行统计分析。

结果

数据显示,在放置分离器后的4小时、24小时和3天,疼痛程度显著增加。弹性体分离器产生的分离量明显多于弹簧分离器,并且在插入后的前3天引起的疼痛最大。然而,在所有时间间隔内,两种分离器的疼痛评分之间没有显著差异。

结论

在分离的早期阶段,弹性体和弹簧分离器的疼痛和不适程度相当。发现弹性体分离器在牙齿分离方面比弹簧分离器更有效。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实这一初步观察结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f711/5184389/de9b93d4e0db/JISPCD-6-549-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验