• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

终末期关怀教育作为全科医生的混合式学习方法:范围综述。

End-of-Life Care Education as Blended Learning Approach for General Practitioners: a Scoping Review.

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care and Psycho-Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700160, India.

Department of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2023 Oct;38(5):1440-1458. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02358-w. Epub 2023 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-023-02358-w
PMID:37648949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10509089/
Abstract

General practitioners (GPs) are critical in providing primary palliative care in the community. Apprehensions about managing a dying person at home, difficulties in goals of care discussion, limited resources and lack of palliative care education often hinder end-of-life care provision in the community. This review focused on the end-of-life care training programs accessed by GPs and sought to understand if the training programs' content and mode of delivery aligned with their preferred needs. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched to identify articles published in English between 01 January 1990 and 30 September 2022. Additionally, searches were conducted using SCOPUS, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane database using free texts. The reviewers screened the titles, abstracts, and full text to identify eligible studies and extracted textual data to analyse and generate themes. Out of 5532 citations initially accessed, 17 studies were included in the review. Six themes were generated: knowledge translation, skill development, a change in attitude, self-efficacy, satisfaction, and patient outcomes. The GPs' end-of-life care knowledge, skills, attitude, self-efficacy, and patient outcomes were better when their training had a combination of small-group interactive workshops, trigger case-based reflective learning, mentor-facilitated experiential learning, web-based modules, and peer learning. The synthesis of review findings supports blended learning as a training approach for general the practitioners' end-of-life care education as it facilitates learning and patient outcomes.

摘要

全科医生在社区提供初级姑息治疗方面起着至关重要的作用。在家中管理临终患者的担忧、在目标关怀讨论中遇到的困难、资源有限以及缺乏姑息治疗教育,这些都常常阻碍了社区临终关怀的提供。本综述重点关注全科医生可获得的临终关怀培训计划,并试图了解培训计划的内容和交付模式是否符合他们的偏好需求。使用 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO 检索了 1990 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 9 月 30 日期间以英文发表的文章。此外,还使用 SCOPUS、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 数据库使用自由文本进行了搜索。评审员筛选了标题、摘要和全文,以确定符合条件的研究,并提取文本数据进行分析和生成主题。在最初访问的 5532 条引文中,有 17 项研究纳入了综述。生成了六个主题:知识转化、技能发展、态度改变、自我效能、满意度和患者结果。当培训采用小组互动研讨会、触发案例为基础的反思性学习、导师促进的体验式学习、基于网络的模块和同伴学习相结合时,全科医生的临终关怀知识、技能、态度、自我效能和患者结果会更好。综述结果的综合支持混合学习作为全科医生临终关怀教育的培训方法,因为它促进了学习和患者结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/10509089/f1b079c77452/13187_2023_2358_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/10509089/f1b079c77452/13187_2023_2358_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/10509089/f1b079c77452/13187_2023_2358_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
End-of-Life Care Education as Blended Learning Approach for General Practitioners: a Scoping Review.终末期关怀教育作为全科医生的混合式学习方法:范围综述。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Oct;38(5):1440-1458. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02358-w. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
2
Views of general practitioners on end-of-life care learning preferences: a systematic review.全科医生对临终关怀学习偏好的看法:系统评价。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Sep 21;21(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01053-9.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Using Social Constructivist Learning Theory to Unpack General Practitioners' Learning Preferences of End-of-Life Care: A Systematically Constructed Narrative Review.运用社会建构主义学习理论剖析全科医生对临终关怀的学习偏好:一项系统构建的叙述性综述
Indian J Palliat Care. 2023 Oct-Dec;29(4):368-374. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_50_2023. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Primary care physicians' educational needs and learning preferences in end of life care: A focus group study in the UK.基层医疗医生在临终关怀方面的教育需求和学习偏好:英国的一项焦点小组研究
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Mar 9;16(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0191-2.
7
Increasing the chance of dying at home: roles, tasks and approaches of general practitioners enabling palliative care: a systematic review of qualitative literature.提高在家中去世的几率:使姑息治疗成为可能的全科医生的角色、任务和方法:定性文献的系统评价。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Mar 23;24(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02038-0.
8
Out-of-hours palliative care: what are the educational needs and preferences of general practitioners?非工作时间的姑息治疗:全科医生的教育需求和偏好是什么?
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2016 Sep;6(3):362-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000764. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
9
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
10
"It is not the fading candle that one expects": general practitioners' perspectives on life-preserving versus "letting go" decision-making in end-of-life home care.“人们所期待的并非那逐渐熄灭的蜡烛”:全科医生对临终家庭护理中维持生命与“放手”决策的看法。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015;33(4):233-42. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1118837. Epub 2015 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Integration of Palliative Care into Primary Care: A Collaborative Effort Between the Indian Association of Palliative Care and the Indian Association of Preventive and Social Medicine.将姑息治疗纳入初级保健:印度姑息治疗协会与印度预防与社会医学协会的合作努力。
Indian J Community Med. 2024 Dec;49(Suppl 2):S234-S239. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_858_24. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
2
Palliative care education and knowledge transfer into practice - a multicenter survey among medical students and resident physicians in Germany using a mixed-methods design.姑息治疗教育及知识向实践转移——基于混合方法设计对德国医学生和住院医师的多中心调查。
GMS J Med Educ. 2024 Jun 17;41(3):Doc27. doi: 10.3205/zma001682. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of interprofessional collaborative practice in palliative care on outcomes for advanced cancer inpatients in a resource-limited setting.资源有限环境下姑息治疗中的跨专业协作实践对晚期癌症住院患者结局的影响。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Dec 29;21(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01121-0.
2
Palliative medicine Master Classes for primary care: an evaluation.姑息医学基层医疗教学课程:评估。
J Prim Health Care. 2022 Sep;14(3):207-213. doi: 10.1071/HC22045.
3
Views of general practitioners on end-of-life care learning preferences: a systematic review.
全科医生对临终关怀学习偏好的看法:系统评价。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Sep 21;21(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01053-9.
4
Patient reported outcomes in oncology: changing perspectives-a systematic review.肿瘤学中的患者报告结局:观念转变——系统综述。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 May 21;20(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01987-x.
5
A framework for interprofessional team collaboration in a hospital setting: Advancing team competencies and behaviours.医院环境中的跨专业团队合作框架:提升团队能力和行为。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2022 Mar;35(2):112-117. doi: 10.1177/08404704211063584. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
6
Communication in the face of death and dying - how does the encounter with death influence the patient management competence of medical students? An outcome-evaluation.面对死亡和临终的沟通 - 与死亡的相遇如何影响医学生的患者管理能力?一项结果评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jan 10;22(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-03060-5.
7
Building capacity for palliative care delivery in primary care settings: Mixed-methods evaluation of the INTEGRATE Project.在基层医疗环境中建立提供姑息治疗的能力:INTEGRATE 项目的混合方法评估。
Can Fam Physician. 2021 Apr;67(4):270-278. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6704270.
8
Where Do Cancer Patients in Receipt of Home-Based Palliative Care Prefer to Die and What Are the Determinants of a Preference for a Home Death?居家接受姑息治疗的癌症患者愿意在哪里去世,以及影响其选择居家死亡的因素有哪些?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 30;18(1):235. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010235.
9
Estimating the Number of Patients Receiving Specialized Palliative Care Globally in 2017.估算 2017 年全球接受专科姑息治疗的患者人数。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Apr;61(4):812-816. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.036. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
10
Blended Learning Compared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.混合式学习与医学教育中的传统学习比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 10;22(8):e16504. doi: 10.2196/16504.