Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jun 1;3(6):489-497. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0579.
Among patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF), the long-term clinical implications of hospitalization at hospitals based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) is not known.
To evaluate the association of hospital-specific 30-day RSMR with long-term survival among patients hospitalized with HF in the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-HF registry.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The longitudinal observational study included 106 304 patients with HF who were admitted to 317 centers participating in the Get With The Guidelines-HF registry from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2013, and had Medicare-linked follow-up data. Hospital-specific 30-day RSMR was calculated using a hierarchical logistic regression model. In the model, 30-day mortality rate was a binary outcome, patient baseline characteristics were included as covariates, and the hospitals were treated as random effects. The association of 30-day RSMR-based hospital groups (low to high 30-day RSMR: quartile 1 [Q1] to Q4) with long-term (1-year, 3-year, and 5-year) mortality was assessed using adjusted Cox models. Data analysis took place from June 29, 2017, to February 19, 2018.
Thirty-day RSMR for participating hospitals.
One-year, 3-year, and 5-year mortality rates.
Of the 106 304 patients included in the analysis, 57 552 (54.1%) were women and 84 595 (79.6%) were white, and the median (interquartile range) age was 81 (74-87) years. The 30-day RSMR ranged from 8.6% (Q1) to 10.7% (Q4). Hospitals in the low 30-day RSMR group had greater availability of advanced HF therapies, cardiac surgery, and percutaneous coronary interventions. In the primary landmarked analyses among 30-day survivors, there was a graded inverse association between 30-day RSMR and long-term mortality (Q1 vs Q4: 5-year mortality, 73.7% vs 76.8%). In adjusted analysis, patients admitted to hospitals in the high 30-day RSMR group had 14% (95% CI, 10-18) higher relative hazards of 5-year mortality compared with those admitted to hospitals in the low 30-day RSMR group. Similar findings were observed in analyses of survival from admission, with 22% (95% CI, 18-26) higher relative hazards of 5-year mortality for patients admitted to Q4 vs Q1 hospitals.
Lower hospital-level 30-day RSMR is associated with greater 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival for patients with HF. These differences in 30-day survival continued to accrue beyond 30 days and persisted long term, suggesting that 30-day RSMR may be a useful HF performance metric to incentivize quality care and improve long-term outcomes.
在因心力衰竭(HF)住院的患者中,基于 30 天风险标准化死亡率(RSMR)的医院住院的长期临床意义尚不清楚。
评估特定于医院的 30 天 RSMR 与美国心脏协会 Get With The Guidelines-HF 注册中心 HF 住院患者长期生存之间的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:这项纵向观察性研究纳入了 106304 名 HF 患者,他们于 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 31 日期间在 317 个参与 Get With The Guidelines-HF 注册中心的中心入院,并具有医疗保险相关的随访数据。使用分层逻辑回归模型计算特定于医院的 30 天 RSMR。在该模型中,30 天死亡率为二项结局,患者基线特征为协变量,医院为随机效应。使用调整后的 Cox 模型评估基于 30 天 RSMR 的医院组(低至高 30 天 RSMR:四分位 1[Q1]至 Q4)与长期(1 年、3 年和 5 年)死亡率之间的关联。数据分析于 2017 年 6 月 29 日至 2018 年 2 月 19 日进行。
参与医院的 30 天 RSMR。
1 年、3 年和 5 年死亡率。
在纳入分析的 106304 名患者中,57552 名(54.1%)为女性,84595 名(79.6%)为白人,中位(四分位距)年龄为 81(74-87)岁。30 天 RSMR 范围为 8.6%(Q1)至 10.7%(Q4)。30 天 RSMR 较低的医院有更多的高级 HF 治疗、心脏手术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的应用。在 30 天存活者的主要标志性分析中,30 天 RSMR 与长期死亡率之间呈梯度负相关(Q1 与 Q4:5 年死亡率,73.7%与 76.8%)。在调整分析中,与 30 天 RSMR 较低的医院相比,入住 30 天 RSMR 较高的医院的患者 5 年死亡率的相对危险度增加了 14%(95%CI,10-18)。在入院后生存分析中也观察到了类似的结果,与 Q1 医院相比,Q4 医院的患者 5 年死亡率的相对危险度增加了 22%(95%CI,18-26)。
较低的医院 30 天 RSMR 与 HF 患者的 1 年、3 年和 5 年生存率的提高相关。这种 30 天生存率的差异在 30 天后仍在继续增加,并持续存在,表明 30 天 RSMR 可能是一种有用的 HF 绩效指标,可以激励提供高质量的护理并改善长期结局。