Moustafa Ahmed T, Tang Anthony Sl, Khan Habib Rehman
Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Aug 15;10:1220709. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1220709. eCollection 2023.
Conduction system pacing (CSP) has been emerging over the last decade as a pacing option instead of conventional right ventricular (RV) pacing and biventricular (BiV) pacing. Numerous case reports, some observational studies and a few randomized control trials have looked at optimum pacing strategies for heart failure (HF) with left bundle branch block (LBBB) or cases where left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is anticipated due to chronic RV pacing (RVP). Evolution of pacing strategies from standard RVP to septal RVP, BiV pacing and now CSP have shown improving hemodynamic responses and possible ease of implantation of CSP systems. In this review article, we review the literature on the evolution of CSP and common scenarios where it might be beneficial.
在过去十年中,传导系统起搏(CSP)作为一种起搏选择正在兴起,以替代传统的右心室(RV)起搏和双心室(BiV)起搏。众多病例报告、一些观察性研究以及少数随机对照试验研究了针对伴有左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)的心力衰竭(HF)或因慢性右心室起搏(RVP)预期会出现左心室(LV)功能障碍的病例的最佳起搏策略。起搏策略从标准RVP发展到间隔RVP、BiV起搏,如今又发展到CSP,已显示出其血流动力学反应不断改善,并且CSP系统的植入可能更容易。在这篇综述文章中,我们回顾了有关CSP演变以及其可能有益的常见情况的文献。