Suppr超能文献

[经左单一肋间间隙切口非体外循环微创与正中开胸多支冠状动脉旁路移植术的疗效比较]

[Efficacy of off-pump minimally invasive via a single left intercostal space incision compared with median sternotomy multi-vesselcoronary artery bypass grafting].

作者信息

Huang G H, Zhang H J, Chi L Q, You B, Bo P, Sun G L

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Aug 29;103(32):2516-2521. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20230609-00982.

Abstract

To compare the efficacy of off-pump minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) via a single left intercostal space incision with median sternotomy multi-vesselcoronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Patients who were diagnosed with multi-artery coronary artery disease (CAD) in the Ward 10 of the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University and underwent CABG from July 2019 to January 2022 were retrospectively collected. All the patients were divided into MICS group and conventional CABG group according to the surgical methods. The perioperative outcomes were compared between thetwo groups, including intraoperative blood loss, postoperative 24 h thoracic drainage volume, ventilation duration, length of stay (LOS) in intensive care unit (ICU) and total LOS in hospital. Intraoperative blood flow of graft vesselswas measured by transit-time flow measurement (TTFM) after vascular anastomosis, and mean flow (MF) and pulsatile index (PI) were compared between the two groups. A total of 444 patients were in the final analysis, with 351 males and 93 females, and the mean age of (62.0±8.9) years. There were 179 patients in MICS group and 265 cases in conventional CABG group, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the preoperative profiles between the two groups (all >0.05) except that younger age [(60.7±9.3) years vs (62.8±8.5) years, =0.017] and lower proportion of female [10.1% (18/179) vs 28.3% (75/265), <0.001] were detected in MICS group. Likewise, there was no significant difference in the number of graft vessels between MICS group (3.18±0.74) and conventional CABG group (3.28±0.86) (=0.234). Compared with those in conventional CABG group, patients in MICS group showed longer operation duration [ (5.10±1.09) h vs (4.33±0.86) h], fewer intraoperative blood loss [500 (200, 700) ml vs 700 (600, 900) ml], fewer postoperative 24 h thoracic drainage volume [300 (200, 400) ml vs 400 (250, 500) ml], shorter postoperative ventilation duration [15.0 (12.0, 17.0) h vs 16.5 (12.5, 19.0) h, <0.001], LOS in ICU [18.0 (15.0, 20.0) h vs 20.0 (16.0, 23.0) h, <0.001] and total LOS in hospital [(12.6±2.7) d vs (14.5±3.9) d, <0.001]. MI and PI of graft vessels were similar between the two groups (both >0.05). Moreover, there were no significant differences in major perioperative complications (i.e., repeat thoracotomy, incision infection, stroke) and mortality between the two groups (all >0.05). MICS is an alternative treatment for patients with multi-vessel CAD with better perioperative outcomes compared with conventional CABG.

摘要

比较经左肋间单间隙切口非体外循环微创心脏手术(MICS)与正中开胸多支冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的疗效。回顾性收集2019年7月至2022年1月在首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院心脏外科十病房被诊断为多支冠状动脉疾病(CAD)并接受CABG的患者。根据手术方式将所有患者分为MICS组和传统CABG组。比较两组围手术期结局,包括术中失血量、术后24小时胸腔引流量、通气时间、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(LOS)和总住院LOS。血管吻合后通过渡越时间血流测量(TTFM)测量移植血管的术中血流量,并比较两组的平均血流(MF)和搏动指数(PI)。最终纳入分析444例患者,其中男性351例,女性93例,平均年龄(62.0±8.9)岁。MICS组179例,传统CABG组265例。两组术前资料除MICS组年龄较小[(60.7±9.3)岁 vs (62.8±8.5)岁,P =0.017]和女性比例较低[10.1%(18/179) vs 28.3%(75/265),P<0.001]外,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。同样,MICS组(3.18±0.74)与传统CABG组(3.28±0.86)的移植血管数量差异无统计学意义(P =0.234)。与传统CABG组相比,MICS组患者手术时间较长[(5.10±1.09)小时 vs (4.33±0.86)小时],术中失血量较少[500(200,700)ml vs 700(600,900)ml],术后24小时胸腔引流量较少[300(200,400)ml vs 400(250,500)ml],术后通气时间较短[15.0(12.0,17.0)小时 vs 16.5(12.5,19.0)小时,P<0.001],ICU住院时间[18.0(15.0,20.0)小时 vs 20.0(16.0,23.0)小时,P<0.001]和总住院LOS[(12.6±2.7)天 vs (14.5±3.9)天,P<0.001]。两组移植血管的MF和PI相似(均P>0.05)。此外,两组围手术期主要并发症(即再次开胸、切口感染、卒中)和死亡率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。对于多支CAD患者,MICS是一种替代治疗方法,与传统CABG相比围手术期结局更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验