Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sep 1;66(3):536-556. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000803. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
Although nearly all noninvasive prenatal testing is currently based on analyzing circulating maternal cell-free DNA, the technical methods usedvary considerably. We review the different methods. Based on validation trials and clinical experience, there are mostly relatively small differences in screening performance for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 in singleton pregnancies. Recent reports show low no-call rates for all methods, diminishing its importance when choosing a laboratory. However, method can be an important consideration for twin pregnancies, screening for sex chromosome abnormalities, microdeletion syndromes, triploidy, molar pregnancies, rare autosomal trisomies, and segmental imbalances, and detecting maternal chromosome abnormalities.
虽然目前几乎所有的无创产前检测都是基于分析循环母体游离 DNA,但所使用的技术方法差异很大。我们回顾了不同的方法。基于验证试验和临床经验,在筛查单胎妊娠的 21 三体、18 三体和 13 三体方面,不同方法的筛查性能差异大多较小。最近的报告显示,所有方法的无错报率都很低,因此在选择实验室时,这一点的重要性降低了。然而,对于双胞胎妊娠、性染色体异常、微缺失综合征、三倍体、葡萄胎、罕见的常染色体三体以及片段性不平衡和母体染色体异常的检测,方法可能是一个重要的考虑因素。