Suppr超能文献

对查楚拉和艾哈迈德(2022年)的勘误

Correction to Chachula and Ahmad (2022).

出版信息

Psychol Trauma. 2024 Mar;16(3):381. doi: 10.1037/tra0001558. Epub 2023 Aug 31.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Reports an error in "Professional quality of life, stress, and trauma in nursing students: Before and during the novel coronavirus pandemic" by Kathryn M. Chachula and Nora Ahmad (, 2022[Nov], Vol 14[8], 1333-1337). In the article, the values 7.6% and 1.2% were changed to 19.1% and 2.9%, respectively, in the following text in the second paragraph of the "Comparisons Pre-Pandemic and amid the Pandemic" section of the Results: "exploration of the frequencies revealed that fewer students reported high levels of CS during the pandemic (19.1%) than prior (24.7%) and 2.9% of students reported high levels of STS compared to 0% the year prior." In addition, the percentages listed in the "During Pandemic" section of Table 4 were incorrectly reported and have been amended. Nevertheless, the interpretation of the overall results remains unchanged. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2022-27230-001).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess the levels of stress, burnout, primary and secondary trauma, and self-efficacy before and during the novel coronavirus pandemic in a sample of baccalaureate nursing and psychiatric nursing students, a population which has seldom been studied regarding these factors.

METHOD

The study used a nonexperimental, cross-sectional methodology at 2 time-points. Nursing and psychiatric nursing students enrolled at 1 western Canadian university were invited to participate in an online, anonymous survey in 2020 prior to the pandemic and in 2021 during Canada's third-wave. Survey measures included the Professional Quality of Life Scale (includes Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout, and Secondary Traumatic Stress), the Perceived Stress Scale, the Life Events Checklist to assess the amount of prior traumatic experiences, and the Core Self-Evaluations Scale.

RESULTS

Statistically higher significant differences in prior traumatic experiences measured by the Life Events Checklist were found in the midpandemic cohort in comparison to the prepandemic 2020 student cohort ((159) = -2.32, < .05, 95% CI [-2.23, -.18]). Strong correlated relationships were found in many of the study variables (ranging from = .301 to -.745, ≤ .001).

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study is the first to reveal that students in the nursing field experienced more traumatic events during the pandemic than before. The findings imply that access to greater support for experiences of trauma may be needed to support undergraduate students entering the health care arena amid the novel coronavirus pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

未标注

勘误“护理专业学生的职业生活质量、压力与创伤:新冠疫情之前与期间”,作者凯瑟琳·M·查楚拉和诺拉·艾哈迈德(《护理教育视角》,2022年11月,第14卷第8期,1333 - 1337页)。在文章中,结果部分“疫情前与疫情期间对比”一节第二段的以下文本中,数值7.6%和1.2%分别改为了19.1%和2.9%:“频率探究显示,疫情期间报告高水平同情疲劳(CS)的学生(19.1%)少于之前(24.7%),报告高水平继发性创伤应激(STS)的学生为2.9%,而前一年为0%。”此外,表4“疫情期间”部分列出的百分比报告有误,现已修正。然而,总体结果的解读保持不变。本文的网络版本已更正。(原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录2022 - 27230 - 001中)

目的

本研究旨在评估在新冠疫情之前与期间,本科护理专业和精神科护理专业学生样本中的压力、倦怠、原发性和继发性创伤以及自我效能水平,此前针对这些因素对该群体的研究较少。

方法

本研究采用非实验性横断面研究方法,在两个时间点进行。邀请加拿大西部一所大学的护理专业和精神科护理专业学生于2020年疫情前和2021年加拿大第三波疫情期间参与一项在线匿名调查。调查测量工具包括职业生活质量量表(包括同情满足感、倦怠和继发性创伤应激)、感知压力量表、评估既往创伤经历数量的生活事件清单以及核心自我评价量表。

结果

与2月疫情前的学生队列相比,生活事件清单测量的疫情中期队列中既往创伤经历在统计学上存在显著差异(t(159) = -2.32,p <.05,置信区间95% [-2.23, -0.18])。在许多研究变量中发现了强相关关系(范围从r =.301至 -0.745,p ≤.001)。

结论

这项初步研究首次揭示,护理领域的学生在疫情期间经历的创伤事件比之前更多。研究结果表明,在新冠疫情期间,可能需要为创伤经历提供更多支持,以帮助本科学生进入医疗保健领域。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2024美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验