• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Severity grading system for acute allergic reactions: A multidisciplinary Delphi study.急性过敏反应严重程度分级系统:一项多学科 Delphi 研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jul;148(1):173-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Persistent, refractory, and biphasic anaphylaxis: A multidisciplinary Delphi study.持续性、难治性和双相性过敏反应:一项多学科德尔菲研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Nov;146(5):1089-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
3
A severity grading system of food-induced acute allergic reactions to avoid the delay of epinephrine administration.一种食物诱发的急性过敏反应严重程度分级系统,以避免延误肾上腺素的使用。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Oct;127(4):462-470.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.04.015. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
4
United States Drug Allergy Registry (USDAR) grading scale for immediate drug reactions.美国药物过敏登记处(USDAR)即时药物反应分级量表。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023 Dec;152(6):1581-1586. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.08.018. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
5
Emergency management of food allergy: systems perspective.食物过敏的应急管理:系统视角
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Jun;5(3):293-8. doi: 10.1097/01.all.0000168797.14487.73.
6
Improving Severity Scoring of Food-Induced Allergic Reactions: A Global "Best-Worst Scaling" Exercise.改善食物过敏反应严重程度评分:全球“最佳最差标度”实践。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Nov;9(11):4075-4086.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.06.056. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
7
How to define severity: A review of allergic reaction severity scoring systems.如何定义严重程度:过敏反应严重程度评分系统综述。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 Aug;131(2):170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.05.009. Epub 2023 May 19.
8
Consensus clinical scoring for suspected perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reactions.疑似围手术期即刻过敏反应的共识临床评分。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jul;123(1):e29-e37. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.02.029. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
9
Addressing barriers to emergency anaphylaxis care: from emergency medical services to emergency department to outpatient follow-up.应对紧急过敏反应救治的障碍:从紧急医疗服务到急诊科再到门诊随访。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 Oct;115(4):301-5. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.07.008. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
10
SAFE: a multidisciplinary approach to anaphylaxis education in the emergency department.SAFE:急诊科过敏反应教育的多学科方法
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2007 Jun;98(6):519-23. doi: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)60729-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency Monitoring Following A Diagnosis of Anaphylaxis.过敏反应诊断后的紧急监测
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2025 Jul 8;25(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s11882-025-01210-z.
2
A case of camrelizumab-induced anaphylaxis and successful rechallenge: a case report and literature review.一例卡瑞利珠单抗诱导的过敏反应及再次给药成功:病例报告与文献综述
Front Oncol. 2025 Mar 21;15:1537205. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1537205. eCollection 2025.
3
Anaphylaxis severity grade, during oral food challenges, assessed by five different classifications.在口服食物激发试验期间,通过五种不同分类法评估的过敏反应严重程度等级。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2025 Mar;36(3):e70065. doi: 10.1111/pai.70065.
4
Hypersensitivity Reactions to Fibrin Glue during Epidural Blood Patching.硬膜外血补丁过程中对纤维蛋白胶的超敏反应。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Apr 2;46(4):840-845. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8568.
5
Exploring the anti-anaphylaxis potential of natural products: A Review.探索天然产物的抗过敏潜力:综述
Inflammopharmacology. 2025 Mar 19. doi: 10.1007/s10787-025-01685-2.
6
Scoping a paediatric emergency medicine unit.规划一个儿科急诊科。
Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Apr;37(2):e70033. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.70033.
7
Anaphylaxis definition, overview, and clinical support tool: 2024 consensus report-a GALEN project.过敏反应的定义、概述及临床支持工具:2024年共识报告——一项盖伦项目
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2025 Jan 27. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2025.01.021.
8
Natural history of sesame allergy in pediatric patients: Insight from a retrospective analysis.儿科患者芝麻过敏的自然病史:一项回顾性分析的见解
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2025 Jan;36(1):e70022. doi: 10.1111/pai.70022.
9
Epinephrine and anaphylaxis outcomes: Does timing matter?肾上腺素与过敏反应结局:时机重要吗?
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2024 Nov;133(5):501-502. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2024.08.029.
10
Anaphylaxis: Definition and criteria.过敏反应:定义与标准。
J Food Allergy. 2024 Jul 1;6(1):26-31. doi: 10.2500/jfa.2024.6.240002. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Caregiver-Reported Presentation of Severe Food-Induced Allergic Reactions in Infants and Toddlers.照顾者报告的婴幼儿严重食物诱导过敏反应的表现。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Jan;9(1):311-320.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
2
Persistent, refractory, and biphasic anaphylaxis: A multidisciplinary Delphi study.持续性、难治性和双相性过敏反应:一项多学科德尔菲研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Nov;146(5):1089-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
3
Anaphylaxis-a 2020 practice parameter update, systematic review, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) analysis.过敏反应-2020 实践参数更新、系统评价和推荐分级评估、发展与评价(GRADE)分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Apr;145(4):1082-1123. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.01.017. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
4
Time to revisit the definition and clinical criteria for anaphylaxis?是时候重新审视过敏反应的定义和临床标准了?
World Allergy Organ J. 2019 Oct 31;12(10):100066. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2019.100066. eCollection 2019 Oct.
5
Trends in emergency care for anaphylaxis.过敏反应的急诊护理趋势。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Feb;8(2):767-768.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
6
Guiding Principles for the Recognition, Diagnosis, and Management of Infants with Anaphylaxis: An Expert Panel Consensus.过敏反应婴儿识别、诊断和管理指南:专家共识。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Apr;7(4):1148-1156.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.10.052. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
7
Economic burden of food allergy: A systematic review.食物过敏的经济负担:系统评价。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Apr;122(4):373-380.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
8
AR101 Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy.AR101 口服免疫疗法治疗花生过敏。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):1991-2001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812856. Epub 2018 Nov 18.
9
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
10
The urgent need for a harmonized severity scoring system for acute allergic reactions.急需制定一个协调一致的急性过敏反应严重程度评分系统。
Allergy. 2018 Sep;73(9):1792-1800. doi: 10.1111/all.13408. Epub 2018 Jun 17.

急性过敏反应严重程度分级系统:一项多学科 Delphi 研究。

Severity grading system for acute allergic reactions: A multidisciplinary Delphi study.

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jul;148(1):173-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.003
PMID:
33476673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8273088/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no widely adopted severity grading system for acute allergic reactions, including anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions, thus limiting the ability to optimize and standardize management practices and advance research.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop a severity grading system for acute allergic reactions for use in clinical care and research.

METHODS

From May to September 2020, we convened a 21-member multidisciplinary panel of allergy and emergency care experts; 9 members formed a writing group to critically appraise and assess the strengths and limitations of prior severity grading systems and develop the structure and content for an optimal severity grading system. The entire study panel then revised the grading system and sought consensus by utilizing Delphi methodology.

RESULTS

The writing group recommended that an optimal grading system encompass the severity of acute allergic reactions on a continuum from mild allergic reactions to anaphylactic shock. Additionally, the severity grading system must be able to discriminate between clinically important differences in reaction severity to be relevant in research while also being intuitive and straightforward to apply in clinical care. Consensus was reached for all elements of the proposed severity grading system.

CONCLUSION

We developed a consensus severity grading system for acute allergic reactions, including anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions. Successful international validation, refinement, dissemination, and application of the grading system will improve communication among providers and patients about the severity of allergic reactions and will help advance future research.

摘要

背景

目前尚无广泛应用的急性过敏反应(包括过敏反应和非过敏反应)严重程度分级系统,这限制了管理实践的优化和标准化,并阻碍了相关研究的进展。

目的

本研究旨在为临床和研究制定急性过敏反应严重程度分级系统。

方法

2020 年 5 月至 9 月,我们召集了一个由 21 名过敏和急救护理专家组成的多学科小组;其中 9 名成员组成一个写作小组,批判性地评估和评估先前的严重程度分级系统的优缺点,并制定最佳严重程度分级系统的结构和内容。然后,全体研究小组成员利用德尔菲法修订分级系统并达成共识。

结果

写作小组建议,一个理想的分级系统应涵盖从轻度过敏反应到过敏性休克的急性过敏反应的严重程度连续谱。此外,该严重程度分级系统必须能够区分临床反应严重程度的重要差异,以便在研究中具有相关性,同时在临床护理中具有直观和直接的应用。所有提议的严重程度分级系统的要素都达成了共识。

结论

我们制定了一个急性过敏反应(包括过敏反应和非过敏反应)的共识严重程度分级系统。该分级系统的成功国际验证、细化、传播和应用将改善提供者和患者之间关于过敏反应严重程度的沟通,并有助于推进未来的研究。