Suppr超能文献

测量白蛋白尿或蛋白尿:一种方法适用于所有情况吗?

Measuring albuminuria or proteinuria: does one answer fit all?

作者信息

Harrison Tyrone G, Tonelli Marcello

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Kidney Int. 2023 Nov;104(5):904-909. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.08.008. Epub 2023 Aug 29.

Abstract

Measurement of proteinuria is critical for diagnosing and monitoring kidney disease. A variety of measures are available to clinicians and can identify all urinary proteins (proteinuria) or urine albumin alone (albuminuria). Proteinuria and albuminuria can be measured in either a random urine sample or a timed urine collection (often over 24 hours). Although an international guideline advocates the use of the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio for most purposes, this measure is not universally available worldwide and historically has been more costly than alternatives. In addition, there may be important differences in accuracy between the albumin-to-creatinine ratio and others based on magnitude of albuminuria, sex, and certain clinical contexts. In this mini review, we review recommendations from international guidelines and discuss specific contexts where the optimal measure of proteinuria is unclear and, in some situations, controversial. We discuss the evidence supporting current recommendations for choice of measure, including the clinical settings of glomerulonephritis, transplantation, and pregnancy. We also discuss how patient sex and cost may impact this decision.

摘要

蛋白尿的测量对于肾脏疾病的诊断和监测至关重要。临床医生有多种测量方法可供选择,这些方法可以识别所有尿蛋白(蛋白尿)或仅尿液白蛋白(白蛋白尿)。蛋白尿和白蛋白尿可以在随机尿样或定时尿液收集(通常为24小时)中进行测量。尽管一项国际指南主张在大多数情况下使用尿白蛋白与肌酐比值,但该测量方法在全球范围内并非普遍可用,而且从历史上看,其成本高于其他方法。此外,根据白蛋白尿的程度、性别和某些临床情况,白蛋白与肌酐比值和其他方法在准确性上可能存在重要差异。在本综述中,我们回顾了国际指南中的建议,并讨论了蛋白尿最佳测量方法尚不清楚且在某些情况下存在争议的具体情况。我们讨论了支持当前测量方法选择建议的证据,包括肾小球肾炎、移植和妊娠的临床环境。我们还讨论了患者性别和成本可能如何影响这一决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验