• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与治疗方式相关的不完全流产结局

Outcomes of incomplete abortion related to treatment modality.

作者信息

Sharvit Merav, Yagur Yael, Shams Rebecca, Daykan Yair, Klein Zvi, Schonman Ron

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ashdod, Israel.

Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Nov;308(5):1543-1548. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07182-7. Epub 2023 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-023-07182-7
PMID:37653249
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the differences in treatment outcomes between misoprostol and surgical evacuation for the management of incomplete abortion.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study compared patients with a clinical diagnosis of incomplete abortion who underwent surgical or pharmaceutical (misoprostol) intervention, 2014-2017. Demographics, sonographic results, treatment follow-up, and post-intervention data on retained products of conception were retrieved. Women with incomplete abortion who underwent surgical versus pharmaceutical intervention were compared.

RESULTS

Among 589 spontaneous abortions, 198 were included in the study, of which 123 (62.1%) underwent surgical evacuation and 75 (37.9%) pharmaceutical intervention with misoprostol. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. During 130.8 ± 91.7 days of follow-up, no patient who underwent surgical evacuation had retained products of conception or needed surgical hysteroscopy. Four cases (5.3%) in the misoprostol group had retained products of conception and needed hysteroscopy (p = 0.02). Patients who underwent surgical evacuation had higher hemoglobin levels during follow-up (12.1 mg/dL vs. 11.7 mg/dL, p = 0.05). There were no differences in post-treatment pregnancy rates between groups.

CONCLUSION

Long-term follow-up after incomplete abortion showed that hemodynamically stable patients treated with misoprostol achieved the desired results in 95% of cases without significant differences in pregnancy intervals compared to surgical management. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are required to confirm the outcomes described in this study.

摘要

目的

本研究评估米索前列醇与手术清宫治疗不全流产的疗效差异。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究比较了2014年至2017年期间临床诊断为不全流产并接受手术或药物(米索前列醇)干预的患者。收集了人口统计学资料、超声检查结果、治疗随访情况以及干预后关于妊娠物残留的数据。对接受手术与药物干预的不全流产女性进行了比较。

结果

在589例自然流产患者中,198例纳入研究,其中123例(62.1%)接受了手术清宫,75例(37.9%)接受了米索前列醇药物干预。两组的基线特征相似。在130.8±91.7天的随访期间,接受手术清宫的患者均无妊娠物残留或需要进行宫腔镜手术。米索前列醇组有4例(5.3%)出现妊娠物残留并需要进行宫腔镜检查(p = 0.02)。接受手术清宫的患者在随访期间血红蛋白水平较高(12.1mg/dL对11.7mg/dL,p = 0.05)。两组治疗后的妊娠率无差异。

结论

不全流产后的长期随访表明,血流动力学稳定的患者使用米索前列醇治疗,95%的病例取得了预期效果,与手术治疗相比,妊娠间隔无显著差异。需要进一步进行更大样本量的前瞻性研究来证实本研究中描述的结果。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of incomplete abortion related to treatment modality.与治疗方式相关的不完全流产结局
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Nov;308(5):1543-1548. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07182-7. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
2
MisoREST: surgical versus expectant management in women with an incomplete evacuation of the uterus after misoprostol treatment for miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial.米索前列醇治疗流产后宫内残留妇女的手术治疗与期待治疗对比:一项随机对照试验(MisoREST)
Hum Reprod. 2016 Nov;31(11):2421-2427. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew221. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
3
A medical approach to management of spontaneous abortion using misoprostol. Extending misoprostol treatment to a maximum of 48 hours can further improve evacuation of retained products of conception in spontaneous abortion.一种使用米索前列醇治疗自然流产的医学方法。将米索前列醇治疗延长至最长48小时可进一步改善自然流产中残留妊娠物的排出。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997 Mar;76(3):248-51.
4
Spontaneous abortion: a randomized, controlled trial comparing surgical evacuation with conservative management using misoprostol.自然流产:一项比较手术清宫与使用米索前列醇保守治疗的随机对照试验。
Fertil Steril. 1999 Jun;71(6):1054-9. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00128-4.
5
Women's perceptions of and experiences with the use of misoprostol for treatment of incomplete abortion in central Malawi: a mixed methods study.马拉维中部地区妇女对米索前列醇治疗不完全流产的认知和使用体验:一项混合方法研究。
Reprod Health. 2023 Feb 2;20(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01549-w.
6
Fertility and obstetric outcomes after curettage versus expectant management in randomised and non-randomised women with an incomplete evacuation of the uterus after misoprostol treatment for miscarriage.米索前列醇治疗流产后子宫不完全排空的随机及非随机女性刮宫术与期待治疗后的生育及产科结局
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Apr;211:78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.055. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
7
MisoREST: Surgical versus expectant management in women with an incomplete evacuation of the uterus after misoprostol treatment for miscarriage: A cohort study.米索前列醇治疗流产后宫内残留妇女的手术与期待治疗对比:一项队列研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Apr;211:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.019. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
8
Factors influencing women's preferences for subsequent management in the event of incomplete evacuation of the uterus after misoprostol treatment for miscarriage.米索前列醇治疗流产后宫内组织物残留后影响女性对进一步处理选择偏好的因素。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1674-1683. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex216.
9
Surgical versus expectant management in women with an incomplete evacuation of the uterus after treatment with misoprostol for miscarriage: the MisoREST trial.米索前列醇治疗流产后宫内组织物残留的妇女中手术与期待治疗的比较:MisoREST 试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 May 2;13:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-102.
10
Expectant vs medical management for retained products of conception after medical termination of pregnancy: a randomized controlled study.期待治疗与医疗管理在药物流产后宫内残留妊娠组织的随机对照研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct;227(4):599.e1-599.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.025. Epub 2022 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of a four-drug combined regimen compared to uterine curettage in the treatment of incomplete medical abortion: a prospective observational study.四种药物联合方案与刮宫术治疗不全流产的疗效比较:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2025 Apr 9;44(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-00771-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Conception rates after medical versus surgical evacuation of early miscarriage.药物流产与手术流产清除早期流产后妊娠率的比较。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Jan;115(1):118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.07.016. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
2
Medical treatment for early fetal death (less than 24 weeks).早期胎儿死亡(小于24周)的医学治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 17;6(6):CD002253. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002253.pub4.
3
Management of early pregnancy loss, with a focus on patient centered care.早期妊娠丢失的管理,重点关注以患者为中心的护理。
Semin Perinatol. 2019 Mar;43(2):84-94. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2018.12.005. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
4
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.西洛多辛用于治疗良性前列腺增生男性的下尿路症状。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 22;11(11):CD012615. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012615.pub2.
5
A cost-effectiveness analysis of surgical versus medical management of early pregnancy loss.手术与药物治疗早期妊娠丢失的成本效果分析。
Fertil Steril. 2012 Feb;97(2):355-60. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.044. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
6
Contemporary management of early pregnancy failure.早期妊娠失败的当代管理。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;50(1):67-88. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31802f1233.
7
Bleeding patterns after misoprostol vs surgical treatment of early pregnancy failure: results from a randomized trial.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;196(1):31.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.07.053.
8
A comparison of medical management with misoprostol and surgical management for early pregnancy failure.米索前列醇药物治疗与手术治疗早期妊娠失败的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 25;353(8):761-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa044064.
9
A randomized controlled trial comparing medical and expectant management of first trimester miscarriage.一项比较孕早期流产医学处理与期待疗法的随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2004 Feb;19(2):266-71. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh049.
10
Conception, early pregnancy loss, and time to clinical pregnancy: a population-based prospective study.受孕、早期妊娠丢失与临床妊娠时间:一项基于人群的前瞻性研究。
Fertil Steril. 2003 Mar;79(3):577-84. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04694-0.