Wilson Oliver W A, Thai Michella, Williams Lindsay, Nutter Sarah, Myre Maxine, Russell-Mayhew Shelly
Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Te Hau Kori, Te Wāhanga Tātai Hauora Faculty of Health, Te Herenga Waka, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Obes Rev. 2023 Nov;24(11):e13610. doi: 10.1111/obr.13610. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
Though anthropometric measurement (AM) frequently occurs in school settings, it is not without risks to child wellbeing. The aim of this scoping review was to examine how AM in school settings takes place and is reported on to make recommendations on best practices. We identified and extracted data from 440 studies published since 2005 that conducted AM in school (pre-school through secondary/high school) settings. Privacy and sensitivity of AM were unclear in over 90% of studies. Thirty-one studies (7.0%) reported protecting student privacy, while nine (2.0%) reported public measurement. Only five studies reported sensitivity regarding AM (1.1%). Exactly who conducted AM was not specified in 201 studies (45.7%). Sixty-nine studies did not provide a weight status criteria citation (19.2%), and 10 used an incorrect citation (2.7%). In summary, serious shortcomings in the reporting of how AM is conducted and by whom, along with details concerning weight status classification, are evident. There is considerable room for improvement regarding the reporting of key methodological details. We propose best practices for AM in school settings, which also double as conditions that should be met before AM takes place in school settings.
尽管人体测量(AM)在学校环境中经常进行,但这对儿童的福祉并非没有风险。本范围综述的目的是研究学校环境中的人体测量是如何进行的以及如何报告,以便就最佳实践提出建议。我们从2005年以来发表的440项在学校(从幼儿园到中学/高中)环境中进行人体测量的研究中识别并提取了数据。超过90%的研究中人体测量的隐私性和敏感性不明确。31项研究(7.0%)报告了保护学生隐私,而9项(2.0%)报告了公开测量。只有5项研究报告了关于人体测量的敏感性(1.1%)。201项研究(45.7%)未明确具体由谁进行人体测量。69项研究未提供体重状况标准的引用(19.2%),10项使用了错误的引用(2.7%)。总之,在人体测量的实施方式、实施者以及体重状况分类细节的报告方面存在严重缺陷。在关键方法细节的报告方面有很大的改进空间。我们提出了学校环境中人体测量的最佳实践,这些实践也可作为在学校环境中进行人体测量之前应满足的条件。