Sivakumar Nishanth, Srinivasan Dilip, Chakravarthi Sushil, Kannan Ravi
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 1):S377-S382. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_140_23. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
To evaluate the effect of ethyl alcohol wet bonding on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
90 premolar teeth were collected and divided into 6 groups - conventional dry, conventional wet, MIP dry, MIP wet, ethanol dry, and ethanol wet. The teeth were bonded as per the requirements for each group. The teeth were then immersed in water to ensure complete polymerization. Shear bond strength was evaluated using a UTM machine and the ARI scores were also noted. Statistical analysis was done for the SBS and ARI scores obtained.
The highest SBS was obtained with conventional dry and the least SBS was obtained with conventional wet groups. The SBS of ethanol wet bonding was significantly less than that of the MIP wet group but was significantly more than the conventional wet group. ARI scores also suggested that there is more cohesive failure than adhesive failure in the wet MIP and ethanol groups.
The mean SBS (6.5 MPa) was within the optimal bond strength as per the study by Reynolds . (1976). Ethanol can be used as a cheaper alternative to MIP.
评估乙醇湿粘结对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
收集90颗前磨牙,分为6组——传统干法、传统湿法、MIP干法、MIP湿法、乙醇干法和乙醇湿法。按照每组要求对牙齿进行粘结。然后将牙齿浸入水中以确保完全聚合。使用万能材料试验机评估剪切粘结强度,并记录ARI评分。对获得的SBS和ARI评分进行统计分析。
传统干法组获得的SBS最高,传统湿法组获得的SBS最低。乙醇湿粘结的SBS显著低于MIP湿法组,但显著高于传统湿法组。ARI评分还表明,在湿MIP组和乙醇组中,内聚破坏比粘结破坏更多。
根据雷诺兹(1976年)的研究,平均SBS(6.5兆帕)在最佳粘结强度范围内。乙醇可用作比MIP更便宜的替代品。