Suppr超能文献

评价 2 种不同的涂层托槽粘结系统对釉质白斑形成的影响。

Evaluation of the effects of 2 different adhesive-coated bracket systems on white spot lesion formation.

机构信息

Private practice, Samsun, Turkey.

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Dec;164(6):862-867. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.06.020. Epub 2023 Aug 31.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the effects of 2 different adhesive-precoated (APC) bracket systems on white spot lesions (WSLs).

METHODS

The study had a split-mouth design, and 34 patients were included. The APC Flash-Free (FF) and APC II system brackets were used. At the end of the treatment, digital photographs of each tooth were taken, the WSLs were scored, and lesion areas were calculated. In the same session, the mineralization level of the teeth was measured by DIAGNOdent. The 2 bracket systems were compared in terms of bonding time.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the 2 groups regarding the number of WSLs or the size of the lesion areas. In the maxillary arch, 55.3% of the teeth in the FF group and 61.2% in the control group were healthy. In the mandibular arch, no lesions occurred in 61.2% of the teeth in the FF group and 64.7% of the control group. In the evaluation of DIAGNOdent measurements, WSL formation was detected in 3 teeth in the FF group and 4 in the control group. No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups. There was a significant difference between the 2 groups in the evaluation of bonding times.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects did not differ between FF and conventional brackets in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. The use of FF brackets significantly shortened the bonding time.

摘要

介绍

本研究评估了两种不同的预涂层(APC)托槽系统对白色斑点病变(WSLs)的影响。

方法

该研究采用了分口设计,共纳入 34 名患者。使用了 APC Flash-Free(FF)和 APC II 系统托槽。治疗结束时,对每颗牙齿拍摄数码照片,对 WSL 进行评分,并计算病变面积。在同一疗程中,通过 DIAGNOdent 测量牙齿的矿化水平。比较两种托槽系统的粘接时间。

结果

两组在 WSL 数量或病变面积大小方面无差异。在上颌弓,FF 组有 55.3%的牙齿和对照组有 61.2%的牙齿健康。在下颌弓,FF 组有 61.2%的牙齿和对照组有 64.7%的牙齿没有病变。在 DIAGNOdent 测量的评估中,FF 组有 3 颗牙齿和对照组有 4 颗牙齿出现 WSL 形成。两组之间无统计学差异。两组在粘接时间的评估中存在显著差异。

结论

在接受固定正畸治疗的患者中,FF 托槽和传统托槽的效果没有差异。FF 托槽的使用显著缩短了粘接时间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验