Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Department of Endocrinology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Jun;59(6):2115-2123. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28975. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
In patients with Cushing's disease, the preoperative identification of pituitary adenomas is crucial to treatment. However, increasing diagnostic accuracy remains an unresolved issue.
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and the impact of readers' experience regarding high-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (hrMRI) for identifying pituitary adenomas in comparison with conventional contrast-enhanced MRI (cMRI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (dMRI).
Retrospective.
Sixty-five patients (median age, 39 years; interquartile range [IQR], 28-53 years; 60% females) with treatment-naïve Cushing's disease.
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3-T, seven fast spin echo sequences.
The diagnostic accuracies of identifying pituitary adenomas on cMRI, dMRI, combined cMRI and dMRI (cdMRI), and hrMRI were independently evaluated by six readers with three experience levels (high: >20 years, modest: 10-20 years, low: <10 years; two readers for each experience level). Readers were asked to localize the lesion, and measure its diameter on the sequence where identified. The reference standard was postoperative histopathology. The impact of readers' experience and interobserver agreement were assessed. Image quality was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, including overall image quality, sharpness, and structural conspicuity.
McNemar's test, Cochran's test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney U test, and κ statistics for interobserver agreement. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
For identifying pituitary adenomas (median diameter, 5 mm; IQR, 4-5 mm), hrMRI had significantly higher sensitivity (87.7%-93.8%) than cMRI, dMRI, and cdMRI (52.3%-75.4%) for readers with different experience levels. The interobserver agreement was moderate (κ = 0.461-0.523). The sensitivity for hrMRI was comparable between readers with different experience levels (P = 0.371). All image quality scores on hrMRI were significantly higher than cMRI and dMRI (5.0 vs. 4.0).
For identifying pituitary adenomas in patients with treatment-naïve Cushing's disease, hrMRI may show high diagnostic accuracy and seems not to be affected by readers' experience.
3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
在库欣病患者中,术前识别垂体腺瘤对于治疗至关重要。然而,提高诊断准确性仍然是一个未解决的问题。
评估高分辨率对比增强磁共振成像(hrMRI)在识别垂体腺瘤方面的诊断准确性,并与常规对比增强磁共振成像(cMRI)和动态对比增强磁共振成像(dMRI)进行比较,探讨其对不同阅片经验的影响。
回顾性。
65 例(中位年龄 39 岁;四分位间距[IQR],28-53 岁;60%为女性)新诊断的库欣病患者。
场强/序列:3T,七个快速自旋回波序列。
由六名具有三种经验水平(高:>20 年,中:10-20 年,低:<10 年;两名经验水平各一名)的阅片者独立评估 cMRI、dMRI、cMRI 和 dMRI 联合(cdMRI)以及 hrMRI 对垂体腺瘤的诊断准确性。要求阅片者定位病变,并在识别出病变的序列上测量其直径。参考标准是术后组织病理学。评估了阅片者经验和观察者间一致性的影响。使用 5 分李克特量表评估图像质量,包括整体图像质量、清晰度和结构对比度。
采用 McNemar 检验、Cochran 检验、Wilcoxon 符号秩检验、Mann-Whitney U 检验和观察者间一致性的κ 统计分析。P 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
对于识别垂体腺瘤(中位直径 5mm;IQR,4-5mm),高经验水平的阅片者(87.7%-93.8%)使用 hrMRI 的敏感度明显高于 cMRI、dMRI 和 cdMRI(52.3%-75.4%)。不同经验水平的观察者间一致性为中等(κ=0.461-0.523)。不同经验水平的阅片者使用 hrMRI 的敏感度差异无统计学意义(P=0.371)。hrMRI 的所有图像质量评分均明显高于 cMRI 和 dMRI(5.0 分 vs. 4.0 分)。
对于新诊断的库欣病患者,使用 hrMRI 识别垂体腺瘤可能具有较高的诊断准确性,并且似乎不受阅片者经验的影响。
3 级
2 级