Department of Cardiology, Division Heart & Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2023 Dec;30(6):2750-2759. doi: 10.1007/s12350-023-03359-4. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
Machine Learning (ML) allows integration of the numerous variables delivered by cardiac PET/CT, while traditional survival analysis can provide explainable prognostic estimates from a restricted number of input variables. We implemented a hybrid ML-and-survival analysis of multimodal PET/CT data to identify patients who developed myocardial infarction (MI) or death in long-term follow up.
Data from 739 intermediate risk patients who underwent coronary CT and selectively stress O-water-PET perfusion were analyzed for the occurrence of MI and all-cause mortality. Images were evaluated segmentally for atherosclerosis and absolute myocardial perfusion through 75 variables that were integrated through ML into an ML-CCTA and an ML-PET score. These scores were then modeled along with clinical variables through Cox regression. This hybridized model was compared against an expert interpretation-based and a calcium score-based model.
Compared with expert- and calcium score-based models, the hybridized ML-survival model showed the highest performance (CI .81 vs .71 and .64). The strongest predictor for outcomes was the ML-CCTA score.
Prognostic modeling of PET/CT data for the long-term occurrence of adverse events may be improved through ML imaging score integration and subsequent traditional survival analysis with clinical variables. This hybridization of methods offers an alternative to traditional survival modeling of conventional expert image scoring and interpretation.
机器学习(ML)允许整合心脏 PET/CT 提供的大量变量,而传统的生存分析可以从有限数量的输入变量中提供可解释的预后估计。我们实施了一种多模态 PET/CT 数据的 ML 和生存分析的混合方法,以识别在长期随访中发生心肌梗死(MI)或死亡的患者。
对 739 名接受冠状动脉 CT 和选择性应激 O-水-PET 灌注的中危患者进行了分析,以确定 MI 和全因死亡率的发生。通过 75 个变量对图像进行节段性评估,以评估动脉粥样硬化和绝对心肌灌注,这些变量通过 ML 集成到 ML-CCTA 和 ML-PET 评分中。然后通过 Cox 回归对这些评分与临床变量进行建模。将这种混合模型与基于专家解释和基于钙评分的模型进行比较。
与基于专家和钙评分的模型相比,混合 ML 生存模型显示出最高的性能(CI.81 比.71 和.64)。对结果最强的预测因素是 ML-CCTA 评分。
通过 ML 成像评分整合和随后与临床变量的传统生存分析,可以改善 PET/CT 数据对不良事件长期发生的预后建模。这种方法的混合为传统专家图像评分和解释的传统生存建模提供了替代方案。