Laboratory of Clinical Neurochemistry, Section of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Section of Physiology and Biochemistry, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Sep 4;62(2):332-340. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0659. Print 2024 Jan 26.
Decreased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid beta 42/40 ratio (Aβ42/40) is one of the core Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers. Measurement of Aβ42/40 in plasma has also been proposed as a surrogate marker for amyloidosis, however the validity and the diagnostic performance of this biomarker is still uncertain. Here we evaluated two immunoassays targeting distinct regions of the amyloid peptides by (a) performing a method comparison in both CSF and plasma, and (b) assessing the diagnostic performance across the AD continuum.
We used N4PE and N3PA Simoa assays to measure Aβ42/40 in CSF and plasma of 134 patients: preclinical AD (pre-AD, n=19), mild cognitive impairment due to AD (MCI-AD, n=41), AD at the dementia stage (AD-dem, n=35), and a control group (CTRL, n=39). The N4PE includes a detector antibody targeting the amyloid N-terminus, while the N3PA uses a detector targeting amyloid mid-region.
Method comparison of N4PE and N3PA assays revealed discrepancies in assessment of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40. While the diagnostic performance of the two assays did not significantly differ in CSF, in plasma, N4PE assay provided better accuracy for AD discrimination than N3PA assay (AUC AD-dem vs. CTRL 0.77 N4PE, 0.68 N3PA).
While both Aβ42/40 assays allowed for an effective discrimination between CTRL and different AD stages, the assay targeting amyloid N-terminal region provided the best diagnostic performance in plasma. Differences observed in technical and diagnostic performance of the two assays may depend on matrix-specific amyloid processing, suggesting that further studies should be carried to standardize amyloid ratio measurement in plasma.
脑脊液(CSF)中淀粉样蛋白β 42/40 比值(Aβ42/40)降低是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的核心生物标志物之一。血浆中 Aβ42/40 的测量也被提议作为淀粉样蛋白沉积的替代标志物,然而,该生物标志物的有效性和诊断性能仍不确定。在这里,我们通过(a)在 CSF 和血浆中进行方法比较,以及(b)在 AD 连续体中评估该标志物的诊断性能,评估了两种针对淀粉样肽不同区域的免疫分析。
我们使用 N4PE 和 N3PA Simoa 分析检测了 134 名患者的 CSF 和血浆中的 Aβ42/40:临床前 AD(pre-AD,n=19)、AD 所致轻度认知障碍(MCI-AD,n=41)、痴呆阶段的 AD(AD-dem,n=35)和对照组(CTRL,n=39)。N4PE 包含一种针对淀粉样蛋白 N 末端的检测抗体,而 N3PA 使用一种针对淀粉样蛋白中部的检测抗体。
N4PE 和 N3PA 分析的方法比较显示,在评估血浆 Aβ42/Aβ40 时存在差异。虽然两种分析在 CSF 中对 AD 的诊断性能没有显著差异,但在血浆中,N4PE 分析比 N3PA 分析对 AD 的鉴别具有更好的准确性(AD-dem 与 CTRL 的 AUC 值,N4PE 为 0.77,N3PA 为 0.68)。
虽然两种 Aβ42/40 分析都能有效区分 CTRL 和不同的 AD 阶段,但针对淀粉样蛋白 N 末端的分析在血浆中提供了最佳的诊断性能。两种分析在技术和诊断性能方面观察到的差异可能取决于基质特异性淀粉样蛋白加工,这表明应进一步进行研究以标准化血浆中淀粉样蛋白比值的测量。