• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据的干预(EBI)方案是否减少了不适当的程序,减少了不必要的差异,或在国民保健制度中产生了溢出效应?

Did the evidence-based intervention (EBI) programme reduce inappropriate procedures, lessen unwarranted variation or lead to spill-over effects in the National Health Service?

机构信息

Health Economics Bristol, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Sep 1;18(9):e0290996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290996. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0290996
PMID:37656701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10473535/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health systems are under pressure to maintain services within limited resources. The Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme published a first list of guidelines in 2019, which aimed to reduce inappropriate use of interventions within the NHS in England, reducing potential harm and optimising the use of limited resources. Seventeen procedures were selected in the first round, published in April 2019.

METHODS

We evaluated changes in the trends for each procedure after its inclusion in the EBI's first list of guidelines using interrupted time series analysis. We explored whether there was any evidence of spill-over effects onto related or substitute procedures, as well as exploring changes in geographical variation following the publication of national guidance.

RESULTS

Most procedures were experiencing downward trends in the years prior to the launch of EBI. We found no evidence of a trend change in any of the 17 procedures following the introduction of the guidance. No evidence of spill-over increases in substitute or related procedures was found. Geographic variation in the number of procedures performed across English CCGs remained at similar levels before and after EBI.

CONCLUSIONS

The EBI programme had little success in its aim to further reduce the use of the 17 procedures it deemed inappropriate in all or certain circumstances. Most procedure rates were already decreasing before EBI and all continued with a similar trend afterwards. Geographical variation in the number of procedures remained at a similar level post EBI. De-adoption of inappropriate care is essential in maintaining health systems across the world. However, further research is needed to explore context specific enablers and barriers to effective identification and de-adoption of such inappropriate health care to support future de-adoption endeavours.

摘要

背景

医疗体系在有限资源的情况下,面临维持服务的压力。循证干预措施(EBI)计划于 2019 年发布了第一份指南清单,旨在减少英格兰国民保健制度中干预措施的不当使用,减少潜在危害并优化有限资源的利用。第一轮选择了 17 种程序,于 2019 年 4 月发布。

方法

我们使用中断时间序列分析评估了每种程序在被纳入 EBI 的第一份指南清单后趋势的变化。我们探讨了是否存在对相关或替代程序的溢出效应的证据,以及在发布国家指南后是否存在地理差异变化的证据。

结果

大多数程序在 EBI 推出前的几年中呈下降趋势。我们发现,在指南发布后,17 种程序中没有任何一种程序的趋势发生变化。没有发现替代或相关程序的溢出增加的证据。在 EBI 之前和之后,英格兰 CCG 中执行的程序数量的地理差异保持在相似水平。

结论

EBI 计划在其目标方面几乎没有成功,即在所有或某些情况下进一步减少其认为不适当的 17 种程序的使用。在 EBI 之前,大多数程序的使用率已经在下降,并且之后所有程序都继续保持类似的趋势。EBI 之后,程序数量的地理差异保持在相似水平。在全球范围内,淘汰不适当的医疗保健对于维持医疗体系至关重要。然而,需要进一步研究来探索特定背景下有效识别和淘汰此类不适当医疗保健的促进因素和障碍,以支持未来的淘汰努力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d116/10473535/f63a009c61f6/pone.0290996.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d116/10473535/c7d19fafbcd1/pone.0290996.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d116/10473535/f63a009c61f6/pone.0290996.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d116/10473535/c7d19fafbcd1/pone.0290996.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d116/10473535/f63a009c61f6/pone.0290996.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Did the evidence-based intervention (EBI) programme reduce inappropriate procedures, lessen unwarranted variation or lead to spill-over effects in the National Health Service?基于证据的干预(EBI)方案是否减少了不适当的程序,减少了不必要的差异,或在国民保健制度中产生了溢出效应?
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 1;18(9):e0290996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290996. eCollection 2023.
2
Provision of NICE-recommended varicose vein treatment in the NHS.在国民保健制度中提供 NICE 推荐的静脉曲张治疗。
Br J Surg. 2023 Jan 10;110(2):225-232. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac392.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Evaluation of the NHS England evidence-based interventions programme: a difference-in-difference analysis.评价英格兰国民保健署循证干预计划:一项差分分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Feb;32(2):90-99. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014478. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
5
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
6
Changes in publicly and privately funded care in England following a national programme to reduce provision of low-value elective surgery.英格兰全国性计划减少低价值择期手术供应后,公共和私人资助护理的变化。
Br J Surg. 2023 Jan 10;110(2):209-216. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac390.
7
Why did some practices not implement new antibiotic prescribing guidelines on urinary tract infection? A cohort study and survey in NHS England primary care.为什么一些实践没有在 NHS 英格兰初级保健中实施新的尿路感染抗生素处方指南?一项队列研究和调查。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Apr 1;74(4):1125-1132. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky509.
8
Geographical variation in rates of surgical treatment for female stress urinary incontinence in England: a national cohort study.英格兰女性压力性尿失禁手术治疗率的地理差异:一项全国队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 28;9(8):e029878. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029878.
9
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Delivering a national de-adoption programme: a documentary analysis of local commissioning policy compliance with England's Evidence-based Interventions programme (EBI).推行一项全国性的弃用计划:对地方委托政策与英格兰循证干预计划(EBI)的合规情况进行文献分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 29;25(1):995. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13012-0.
2
Relevance and flexibility are key: exploring healthcare managers' views and experiences of a de-adoption programme in the English National Health Service.相关性和灵活性是关键:探索英国国民医疗服务体系中医疗管理者对一项弃用计划的看法和经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 24;25(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12700-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Variations in policies for accessing elective musculoskeletal procedures in the English National Health Service: A documentary analysis.英国国民保健制度中获取选择性肌肉骨骼手术政策的差异:文献分析。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2022 Jul;27(3):190-202. doi: 10.1177/13558196221091518. Epub 2022 May 15.
2
Evaluation of the NHS England evidence-based interventions programme: a difference-in-difference analysis.评价英格兰国民保健署循证干预计划:一项差分分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Feb;32(2):90-99. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014478. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
3
Framework for identification and measurement of spillover effects in policy implementation: intended non-intended targeted non-targeted spillovers (INTENTS).
政策实施中溢出效应识别与衡量框架:预期与非预期、目标与非目标溢出效应(INTENTS)
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Mar 14;3(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00280-8.
4
The Impact of Choosing Wisely Interventions on Low-Value Medical Services: A Systematic Review.明智选择干预措施对低价值医疗服务的影响:系统评价。
Milbank Q. 2021 Dec;99(4):1024-1058. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12531. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
5
Common elective orthopaedic procedures and their clinical effectiveness: umbrella review of level 1 evidence.常见的选修骨科手术及其临床效果:一级证据的伞状综述。
BMJ. 2021 Jul 7;374:n1511. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1511.
6
The impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on HIV care in 65 South African primary care clinics: an interrupted time series analysis.COVID-19 封锁对 65 家南非初级保健诊所中 HIV 护理的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Lancet HIV. 2021 Mar;8(3):e158-e165. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30359-3. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
7
Elective surgery cancellations due to the COVID-19 pandemic: global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans.由于 COVID-19 大流行而取消的择期手术:用于为手术恢复计划提供信息的全球预测模型。
Br J Surg. 2020 Oct;107(11):1440-1449. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11746. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
8
Unpacking the complexities of de-implementing inappropriate health interventions.剖析不恰当卫生干预措施的复杂性。
Implement Sci. 2020 Jan 9;15(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0960-9.
9
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of corticosteroid injection versus night splints for carpal tunnel syndrome (INSTINCTS trial): an open-label, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.中文译文:曲安奈德注射与夜间夹板治疗腕管综合征的临床效果和成本效益(INSTINCTS 试验):一项开放标签、平行组、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 20;392(10156):1423-1433. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31572-1.
10
Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 11: reporting outcomes of an evidence-driven approach to disinvestment in a local healthcare setting.通过有效分配资源实现医疗保健可持续性(SHARE)11:报告在当地医疗环境中以循证方法进行撤资的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 30;18(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3172-0.