• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以传染为手段治理:大流行病政治、COVID-19 以及对佛罗里达州公共卫生的破坏。

Governing with contagion: Pandemic politics, COVID-19, and undermining public health in Florida.

机构信息

Department of Health Behavior and Health Systems, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, Fort Worth, Texas, 76107, USA.

出版信息

Med Anthropol Q. 2023 Dec;37(4):367-381. doi: 10.1111/maq.12806. Epub 2023 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1111/maq.12806
PMID:37656832
Abstract

The United States approached the COVID-19 pandemic with inconsistent responses that varied by state. In Florida, legislators passed laws contrary to mitigating the pandemic. These laws included banning county and municipal efforts to control the spread of COVID-19 through mask mandates, social distancing, and prohibiting vaccination mandates during infectious disease epidemics. Moreover, the Legislature simultaneously prioritized policies of social exclusion, passing bills that constrained the rights of transgender individuals, Black Lives Matter protestors, and educators. In this article, I use the perspectives of critical medical anthropology and "governing through contagion" to examine Florida's COVID-19 response. I argue the COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity for legislators to obfuscate their political power and advance a politics of social division while simultaneously passing policies that undermined human health. I refer to this process as governing with contagion: Using a pandemic as a politically expedient backdrop to conceal power and simultaneously harm human health.

摘要

美国在应对 COVID-19 大流行时的反应不一致,各州的情况有所不同。在佛罗里达州,立法者通过了违背缓解大流行的法律。这些法律包括禁止县和市通过口罩强制令、社交距离和在传染病流行期间禁止疫苗接种强制令来控制 COVID-19 的传播。此外,立法机构同时优先考虑社会排斥政策,通过法案限制跨性别者、“黑人的命也是命”抗议者和教育工作者的权利。在本文中,我使用批判医学人类学的观点和“通过传染病进行治理”来考察佛罗里达州的 COVID-19 应对措施。我认为,COVID-19 大流行为立法者提供了一个机会,他们可以混淆自己的政治权力,并推进社会分裂的政治,同时通过破坏人类健康的政策。我将这个过程称为“通过传染病进行治理”:利用大流行作为政治上有利的背景来掩盖权力,同时损害人类健康。

相似文献

1
Governing with contagion: Pandemic politics, COVID-19, and undermining public health in Florida.以传染为手段治理:大流行病政治、COVID-19 以及对佛罗里达州公共卫生的破坏。
Med Anthropol Q. 2023 Dec;37(4):367-381. doi: 10.1111/maq.12806. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
2
Pandemic Politics: Timing State-Level Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19.大流行政治:新冠疫情时期的州级社会隔离应对措施的时机选择。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Apr 1;46(2):211-233. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8802162.
3
Pharmaceutical messianism and the politics of COVID-19 in the United States.医药救世主主义与美国的 COVID-19 政治。
Glob Public Health. 2024 Jan;19(1):2350656. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2024.2350656. Epub 2024 May 8.
4
Assessing COVID-19 pandemic policies and behaviours and their economic and educational trade-offs across US states from Jan 1, 2020, to July 31, 2022: an observational analysis.评估 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日美国各州的 COVID-19 大流行政策和行为及其经济和教育方面的权衡取舍:一项观察性分析。
Lancet. 2023 Apr 22;401(10385):1341-1360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00461-0. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
5
One Year of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Brazil: A Political and Social Overview.巴西的 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)一年:政治和社会概述。
Ann Glob Health. 2021 May 18;87(1):44. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3182.
6
An Evaluation of Florida's Zika Response Using the WHO Health Systems Framework: Can We Apply These Lessons to COVID-19?利用世界卫生组织卫生系统框架评估佛罗里达州的寨卡病毒应对措施:我们能否将这些经验教训应用于 COVID-19?
Matern Child Health J. 2020 Oct;24(10):1212-1223. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-02969-5.
7
Health and politics in pandemic times: COVID-19 responses in Ethiopia.大流行时期的健康与政治:埃塞俄比亚的 COVID-19 应对措施。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Nov 11;36(10):1681-1689. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab091.
8
Political variations in pandemic lifestyles and COVID-19 vaccination by age cohort in the United States.美国不同政治倾向人群的大流行生活方式变化和按年龄组划分的 COVID-19 疫苗接种情况。
Prev Med. 2023 Jul;172:107525. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107525. Epub 2023 May 8.
9
Evaluating the Impact of Mask Mandates and Political Party Affiliation on Mental Health Internet Search Behavior in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Generalized Additive Mixed Model Framework.评估口罩令和政党认同对美国 COVID-19 大流行期间心理健康互联网搜索行为的影响:广义加性混合模型框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 3;25:e40308. doi: 10.2196/40308.
10
Pandemic politics: Exploring the intersection of state political affiliation and public universities' COVID-19 policies and messaging.大流行政治:探讨国家政治派别与公立大学 COVID-19 政策和信息传递的交集。
J Emerg Manag. 2023 Sep-Oct;21(5):439-452. doi: 10.5055/jem.0790.

引用本文的文献

1
Preparing for the next pandemic: Reflections and recommendations from Florida.为下一次大流行做准备:来自佛罗里达的思考与建议。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0314570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314570. eCollection 2024.