Zhao Zixiang, Lu Yichen, Zhan Yu, Cheng Yuan, Yang Fumo, Brook Jeffrey R, He Kebin
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China.
College of Carbon Neutrality Future Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 15;904:166693. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166693. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
Remote sensing data from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) and the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) play important roles in estimating surface nitrogen dioxide (NO), but few studies have compared their differences for application in surface NO reconstruction. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of incorporating the tropospheric NO vertical column density (VCD) from OMI and TROPOMI (hereafter referred to as OMI and TROPOMI, respectively, for conciseness) for deriving surface NO and to apply the resulting data to revisit the spatiotemporal variations in surface NO for Beijing over the 2005-2020 period during which there were significant reductions in nitrogen oxide emissions. In the OMI versus TROPOMI performance comparison, the cross-validation R values were 0.73 and 0.72, respectively, at 1 km resolution and 0.69 for both at 100 m resolution. The comparisons between satellite data sources indicate that even though TROPOMI has a finer resolution it does not improve upon OMI for deriving surface NO at 1 km resolution, especially for analyzing long-term trends. In light of the comparison results, we used a hybrid approach based on machine learning to derive the spatiotemporal distribution of surface NO during 2005-2020 based on OMI. We had novel, independent passive sampling data collected weekly from July to September of 2008 for hindcasting validation and found a spatiotemporal R of 0.46 (RMSE = 7.0 ppb). Regarding the long-term trend of surface NO, the level in 2008 was obviously lower than that in 2007 and 2009, as expected, which was attributed to pollution restrictions during the Olympic Games. The NO level started to steadily decline from 2015 and fell below 2008's level after 2017. Based on OMI, a long-term and fine-resolution surface NO dataset was developed for Beijing to support future environmental management questions and epidemiological research.
来自臭氧监测仪(OMI)和对流层监测仪(TROPOMI)的遥感数据在估算地表二氧化氮(NO)方面发挥着重要作用,但很少有研究比较它们在地表NO重建应用中的差异。本研究旨在探讨纳入来自OMI和TROPOMI的对流层NO垂直柱密度(VCD)(为简洁起见,以下分别简称为OMI和TROPOMI)以推导地表NO的有效性,并将所得数据应用于重新审视2005 - 2020年期间北京地表NO的时空变化,在此期间氮氧化物排放量显著减少。在OMI与TROPOMI性能比较中,在1公里分辨率下交叉验证R值分别为0.73和0.72,在100米分辨率下两者均为0.69。卫星数据源之间的比较表明,尽管TROPOMI具有更高的分辨率,但在1公里分辨率下推导地表NO时,它并不比OMI有优势,特别是在分析长期趋势方面。根据比较结果,我们使用基于机器学习的混合方法,基于OMI推导2005 - 2020年期间地表NO的时空分布。我们有2008年7月至9月每周收集的新颖、独立的被动采样数据用于后向验证,发现时空R值为0.46(均方根误差 = 7.0 ppb)。关于地表NO的长期趋势,2008年的水平明显低于2007年和2009年,正如预期的那样,这归因于奥运会期间的污染限制措施。NO水平从2015年开始稳步下降,并在2017年后降至低于2008年的水平。基于OMI,为北京开发了一个长期且高分辨率的地表NO数据集,以支持未来的环境管理问题和流行病学研究。