• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管内超声引导与血管造影引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病中的应用:一项系统评价。

Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A systematic review.

机构信息

Cardialysis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Feb;59:99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.08.006. Epub 2023 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2023.08.006
PMID:37657950
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Significant unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease is encountered in approximately 5 % of patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) overcomes many of the known limitations of angiography and improves outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in stable or complex coronary artery disease. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence on IVUS-guidance versus angiography-guidance in ULMCA PCI, highlighting the chronological frequencies of event rates in line with the maturation of PCI technique and devices over time.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic search in Medline was performed to identify all studies that had assessed the effect of IVUS-guided versus angiography-guided ULMCA PCI on various primary and secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies (2 randomized, 10 non-randomized and 5 meta-analyses) were included in this systematic review.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review on IVUS-guided versus angiography-guided PCI in patients with significant ULMCA disease strongly supports the hypothesis that IVUS-guided PCI is associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiac events composites, all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis. Ongoing, adequately powered trials will contribute significantly to the level of evidence.

摘要

背景

在接受诊断性冠状动脉造影的患者中,约有 5%存在明显的无保护左主干冠状动脉(ULMCA)疾病。血管内超声(IVUS)克服了血管造影的许多已知局限性,并改善了稳定或复杂冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的预后。本系统评价的目的是评估在 ULMCA PCI 中 IVUS 指导与血管造影指导的证据,重点是随着时间的推移,随着 PCI 技术和器械的成熟,事件发生率的时间顺序频率。

方法

在 Medline 上进行了全面的系统检索,以确定所有评估 IVUS 指导与血管造影指导 ULMCA PCI 对各种主要和次要终点影响的研究。

结果

本系统评价共纳入 17 项研究(2 项随机、10 项非随机和 5 项荟萃分析)。

结论

本系统评价表明,在患有明显 ULMCA 疾病的患者中,IVUS 指导的 PCI 与主要不良心脏事件综合指标、全因死亡、心脏死亡、心肌梗死和支架血栓形成的显著减少密切相关。正在进行的、充分有力的试验将对证据水平做出重大贡献。

相似文献

1
Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A systematic review.血管内超声引导与血管造影引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病中的应用:一项系统评价。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Feb;59:99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.08.006. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
2
Coronary Angiography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Optical Coherence Tomography for Guiding of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.冠状动脉造影、血管内超声和光学相干断层成像指导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2024 Apr 2;149(14):1065-1086. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067583. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
3
Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.急性心肌梗死患者血管内超声引导与冠状动脉造影引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Apr 15;353:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.01.021. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
4
Intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.血管内成像指导与血管造影指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价和贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04105-5.
5
Intravascular imaging-guided coronary drug-eluting stent implantation: an updated network meta-analysis.血管内成像引导下冠状动脉药物洗脱支架植入术:一项更新的网状荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2024 Mar 2;403(10429):824-837. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02454-6. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
6
The Racial Differences in the Clinical Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血管内超声指导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床结局中的种族差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Sep 15;203:193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.06.084. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
7
Comparison of intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and conventional angiography-guided percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression.血管内超声、光学相干断层成像和常规血管造影指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:系统评价、网络荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Sep;102(3):440-450. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30784. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
8
Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Between Intravascular Ultrasound-, Optical Coherence Tomography- and Angiography-Guided Stent Implantation: A Meta-Analysis.血管内超声、光学相干断层成像和血管造影指导下支架置入的长期疗效比较:Meta 分析。
Angiology. 2024 Oct;75(9):809-819. doi: 10.1177/00033197231198674. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
9
Imaging-guided PCI improves outcomes in patients with multivessel disease a meta-analysis of randomized and observational trials comparing treatment of ACS.影像引导下的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗可改善多支血管病变患者的预后——一项比较急性冠状动脉综合征治疗的随机和观察性试验的荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025 Jun;75:84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.09.003. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
10
Intravascular ultrasound-guided interventions in coronary artery disease: a systematic literature review, with decision-analytic modelling, of outcomes and cost-effectiveness.冠状动脉疾病中血管内超声引导干预:一项系统文献综述,结合决策分析模型,关于结局和成本效益。
Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(35):1-117.

引用本文的文献

1
Intravascular Ultrasound Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Complex Higher Risk-Indicated Patients (CHIPs): Insight from Clinical Evidence.血管内超声引导复杂高风险指征患者(CHIPs)的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:来自临床证据的见解
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 18;25(12):443. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2512443. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血管内超声引导与血管造影引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 11;16(9):e69167. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69167. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Comparison between Imaging and Physiology in Guiding Coronary Revascularization: A Meta-Analysis.
影像学与生理学在指导冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 24;13(9):2504. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092504.