Suppr超能文献

血管内超声引导与血管造影引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Krishna Mohan Gautham Varun, Babar Nawabzada Nadir, Sompalli Sindhuja, Mian Muhammad Umar, Israr Farhan, Chaudhari Sandipkumar S, Wei Calvin R, Allahwala Danish

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, IND.

Internal Medicine, Combined Military Hospital (CMH) Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry, Lahore, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Sep 11;16(9):e69167. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69167. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

This meta-analysis evaluated the clinical outcomes of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major electronic databases, identifying relevant studies published up to August 15, 2024. Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria, comparing IVUS-guided and angiography-guided PCI. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and stent thrombosis, while secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, and revascularization rates. Pooled analysis revealed that IVUS-guided PCI significantly reduced the risk of MACE (risk ratio (RR): 0.63, 95% CI: 0.50-0.79) and stent thrombosis (RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.30-0.90) compared to angiography-guided PCI. Secondary outcomes also favored IVUS guidance, with significant reductions in cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). While a trend towards reduced all-cause mortality was observed with IVUS guidance, it did not reach statistical significance. Notably, low heterogeneity across studies strengthened the reliability of these findings. Meta-regression analysis indicated that the presence of myocardial infarction did not significantly moderate the effect of IVUS on clinical outcomes, suggesting consistent benefits across patient subgroups. These results highlight the potential of IVUS-guided PCI to improve cardiovascular outcomes and reduce the need for repeat procedures. The findings support the growing body of evidence favoring IVUS use in PCI, particularly in complex lesions and high-risk patients. However, considerations such as cost-effectiveness and the need for specialized training remain important factors in the widespread adoption of IVUS-guided PCI in clinical practice.

摘要

这项荟萃分析评估了血管内超声(IVUS)引导与血管造影引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中的临床结局。在各大电子数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,确定截至2024年8月15日发表的相关研究。13项随机对照试验(RCT)符合纳入标准,比较了IVUS引导和血管造影引导的PCI。主要结局为主要不良心脏事件(MACE)和支架血栓形成,次要结局包括全因死亡率、心脏死亡率、心肌梗死和血运重建率。汇总分析显示,与血管造影引导的PCI相比,IVUS引导的PCI显著降低了MACE风险(风险比(RR):0.63,95%置信区间:0.50-0.79)和支架血栓形成风险(RR:0.52,95%置信区间:0.30-0.90)。次要结局也支持IVUS引导,心脏死亡率、心肌梗死、靶病变血运重建(TLR)和靶血管血运重建(TVR)均显著降低。虽然观察到IVUS引导有降低全因死亡率的趋势,但未达到统计学显著性。值得注意的是,各研究间低异质性增强了这些发现的可靠性。Meta回归分析表明,心肌梗死的存在并未显著调节IVUS对临床结局的影响,提示在各患者亚组中均有一致的益处。这些结果凸显了IVUS引导的PCI改善心血管结局及减少重复手术需求的潜力。这些发现支持了越来越多倾向于在PCI中使用IVUS的证据,特别是在复杂病变和高危患者中。然而,成本效益和专业培训需求等因素仍是IVUS引导的PCI在临床实践中广泛应用的重要考量因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27ca/11468466/1289efb67b3b/cureus-0016-00000069167-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验