• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Be-CLIPSS 的制定与部分验证:一种医院临床药学活动的分类系统。

Development and partial validation of Be-CLIPSS: a classification system for hospital clinical pharmacy activities.

机构信息

Department of Hospital Pharmacy, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Jette, Belgium.

Centre for Pharmaceutical Research, Research group of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Jette, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Feb;46(1):80-89. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01627-4. Epub 2023 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1007/s11096-023-01627-4
PMID:37658157
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Documentation of drug related problems (DRPs) and pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) is essential for an objective evaluation of the pharmacist's contribution to pharmacotherapy. However, in Belgium, a nationally used classification system is not available, prohibiting structured and uniform documentation of DRPs and PIs.

AIM

To develop and validate a national classification system for in-hospital clinical pharmacy activities, based on literature and field experience, specifically intended for routine registration.

METHOD

Based on a literature review, a survey among Belgian hospital pharmacists and a stakeholder focus group, a first version of Be-CLIPSS (Belgian CLInical Pharmacy claSsification System) was developed. Inter-rater reliability of the DRPs and PIs was assessed. Additionally, its usability was reviewed. The system was further refined, followed by a second validation.

RESULTS

Both the survey and focus group discussion revealed little use of validated DRP and PI classification systems in Belgium, although these were considered highly desirable if practical and minimally time-consuming. The final classification system encompassed seven clinical pharmacy activities, grouped into four activity classes. The inter-rater reliability for the second activity class was substantial for the DRPs (κ = 0.737) and almost perfect for the PIs (κ = 0.872). The interpretability (86.4%), user-friendliness (61.4%), user satisfaction (84.1%), interest for use in daily practice (68.2%) and difficulty in correctly classifying the DRP and PI (31.8%) were assessed.

CONCLUSION

Be-CLIPSS, a newly developed and partially validated classification system for DRPs and PIs, was found to be user-friendly, with a good interpretability and user satisfaction, resulting in a high interest for use in daily practice.

摘要

背景

记录药物相关问题(DRP)和药物干预(PI)对于客观评估药师在药物治疗中的贡献至关重要。然而,在比利时,没有全国范围内使用的分类系统,这使得 DRP 和 PI 的结构化和统一记录无法实现。

目的

根据文献和实地经验,开发和验证一种用于医院内临床药学活动的全国性分类系统,专门用于常规登记。

方法

基于文献回顾、对比利时医院药师的调查以及利益相关者焦点小组,开发了 Be-CLIPSS(比利时临床药学分类系统)的初始版本。评估了 DRP 和 PI 的组内一致性。此外,还对其可用性进行了评估。对该系统进行了进一步的改进,随后进行了第二次验证。

结果

调查和焦点小组讨论都表明,比利时很少使用经过验证的 DRP 和 PI 分类系统,尽管如果实用且耗时较少,这些系统被认为是非常需要的。最终的分类系统涵盖了 7 种临床药学活动,分为 4 个活动类别。对于第二个活动类别的 DRP,组内一致性为中等(κ=0.737),对于 PI,组内一致性几乎为完美(κ=0.872)。对其可解释性(86.4%)、用户友好性(61.4%)、用户满意度(84.1%)、在日常实践中使用的兴趣(68.2%)以及正确分类 DRP 和 PI 的难度(31.8%)进行了评估。

结论

Be-CLIPSS 是一种新开发的 DRP 和 PI 分类系统,部分经过验证,具有用户友好性、良好的可解释性和用户满意度,在日常实践中具有很高的使用兴趣。

相似文献

1
Development and partial validation of Be-CLIPSS: a classification system for hospital clinical pharmacy activities.Be-CLIPSS 的制定与部分验证:一种医院临床药学活动的分类系统。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Feb;46(1):80-89. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01627-4. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
2
Demonstrating the clinical pharmacist's activity: validation of an intervention oriented classification system.展示临床药师的活动:一种面向干预的分类系统的验证
Int J Clin Pharm. 2015 Dec;37(6):1162-71. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0179-z. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
3
Evaluation of drug-related problems and subsequent clinical pharmacists' interventions at a Swiss university hospital.评估药物相关问题及随后临床药师在瑞士大学附属医院的干预措施。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Dec;44(6):924-931. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13017. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
4
Documentation of pharmaceutical care: Validation of an intervention oriented classification system.药学服务记录:一种面向干预的分类系统的验证
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;23(6):1425-1432. doi: 10.1111/jep.12817. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
5
Characteristic of drug-related problems and pharmacists' interventions in a stroke unit in Thailand.药物相关问题的特征及药师在泰国卒中单元的干预措施。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Aug;41(4):880-887. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00832-4. Epub 2019 May 3.
6
Evaluation of a method for drug-related problems identification and classification in hospital setting: applicability and reliability.医院环境中药物相关问题识别与分类方法的评估:适用性与可靠性
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Feb;42(1):193-200. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00957-6. Epub 2019 Dec 21.
7
Assessment of clinical pharmacists' interventions in French hospitals: results of a multicenter study.法国医院临床药师干预措施的评估:一项多中心研究的结果。
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Jul;42(7):1095-103. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L045. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
8
Validation of an instrument for the documentation of clinical pharmacists' interventions.临床药师干预记录工具的验证
Pharm World Sci. 2006 Aug;28(4):181-8. doi: 10.1007/s11096-006-9027-5. Epub 2006 Oct 26.
9
Analysis of clinical pharmacist interventions in the neurology unit of a Brazilian tertiary teaching hospital.巴西一家三级教学医院神经内科临床药师干预分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 18;14(1):e0210779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210779. eCollection 2019.
10
Identification of drug-related problems by a clinical pharmacist in addition to computerized alerts.临床药师通过计算机化警示以外的方式识别药物相关问题。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Oct;35(5):753-62. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9798-4. Epub 2013 May 29.

本文引用的文献

1
European Society of Clinical Pharmacy definition of the term clinical pharmacy and its relationship to pharmaceutical care: a position paper.欧洲临床药学学会对临床药学术语的定义及其与药学服务的关系:立场文件。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Aug;44(4):837-842. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01422-7. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
2
Prospective survey-based study on the categorization quality of hospital pharmacists' interventions using DokuPIK.基于前瞻性调查的关于使用DokuPIK对医院药师干预措施进行分类质量的研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Apr;41(2):414-423. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00785-8. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
3
Effectiveness of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation programmes on clinical outcomes at hospital transitions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
药剂师主导的药物重整计划在医院转衔期间对临床结局的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 23;6(2):e010003. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010003.
4
Demonstrating the clinical pharmacist's activity: validation of an intervention oriented classification system.展示临床药师的活动:一种面向干预的分类系统的验证
Int J Clin Pharm. 2015 Dec;37(6):1162-71. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0179-z. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
5
Effectiveness of clinical pharmacy services: an overview of systematic reviews (2000-2010).临床药学服务的有效性:系统评价综述(2000 - 2010年)
Int J Clin Pharm. 2015 Oct;37(5):687-97. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0137-9. Epub 2015 May 23.
6
Economic evaluations of clinical pharmacist interventions on hospital inpatients: a systematic review of recent literature.临床药师对住院患者干预措施的经济学评估:近期文献的系统评价
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Dec;36(6):1101-14. doi: 10.1007/s11096-014-0008-9. Epub 2014 Sep 14.
7
The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review.住院不良事件的发生率及性质:一项系统综述
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Jun;17(3):216-23. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023622.
8
Drug-related problems in hospitals: a review of the recent literature.医院中的药物相关问题:近期文献综述
Drug Saf. 2007;30(5):379-407. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200730050-00003.
9
Development and reliability testing of the clinical pharmacist recommendation taxonomy.临床药师推荐分类法的开发与可靠性测试
Pharmacotherapy. 2007 May;27(5):639-46. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.5.639.
10
Validation of an instrument for the documentation of clinical pharmacists' interventions.临床药师干预记录工具的验证
Pharm World Sci. 2006 Aug;28(4):181-8. doi: 10.1007/s11096-006-9027-5. Epub 2006 Oct 26.