Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Oct;35(5):753-62. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9798-4. Epub 2013 May 29.
Both clinical pharmacists and computerized physician order entry systems with clinical decision support (CPOE/CDSS) can reduce drug-related problems (DRPs). However, the contribution of a clinical pharmacist in addition to CPOE/CDSS has not been established in a prospective study.
To determine which DRPs can be identified by a clinical pharmacist in a setting with routine use of CPOE/CDSS.
Two surgical and two neurological wards in St. Elisabeth hospital, a 600-bed teaching hospital in the Netherlands.
In this observational prospective follow-up study a clinical pharmacist reviewed the pharmacotherapy of patients admitted to surgical and neurological wards to identify DRPs (i.e. medication errors and adverse drug events) and discussed the relevance of identified problems and interventions to resolve these with the responsible physician. Acceptance of the proposed interventions and the presence of alerts in CPOE/CDSS were assessed. Primary outcome was the proportion of DRPs identified by the clinical pharmacist that also triggered a CPOE/CDSS alert. Differences between the DRPs that generated an alert and those that did not were expressed as relative risks or analyzed with Chi square statistics or Mann-Whitney U tests.
The proportion of drug-related problems identified by the clinical pharmacist that also generated an alert in the CPOE/CDSS.
During 1206 medication reviews, 442 potential DRPs were identified; 286 (65 %) DRPs were considered relevant and 247 (56 %) of the proposed interventions were accepted. A CPOE/CDSS alert was generated for 35 (8 %) of the DRPs the clinical pharmacist identified. The only difference between problems that triggered an alert and those that did not was the class of the DRP (indication 23 vs. 36 %, effectiveness 23 vs. 13 %, safety 23 vs. 10 % and pharmaceutical care issues 31 vs. 42 %, p = 0.02). CPOE/CDSS triggered 623 additional alerts that were handled during routine pharmacy service.
As most DRPs identified by a clinical pharmacist were not detected in daily clinical practice by CPOE/CDSS, a clinical pharmacist contributes to reducing DRPs. The sensitivity of CPOE/CDSS to detect certain classes of problems should be optimized.
临床药师和具有临床决策支持功能的计算机化医嘱录入系统(CPOE/CDSS)均可减少药物相关问题(DRP)。然而,在前瞻性研究中,尚未确定临床药师的作用是否超过 CPOE/CDSS。
确定在常规使用 CPOE/CDSS 的环境中,临床药师可发现哪些药物相关问题。
荷兰圣伊丽莎白医院的两个外科病房和两个神经科病房,该医院为一家拥有 600 张床位的教学医院。
在这项观察性前瞻性随访研究中,临床药师对入住外科和神经科病房的患者的药物治疗进行了评估,以发现药物相关问题(即用药错误和药物不良事件),并与负责的医生讨论所发现问题的相关性和干预措施以解决这些问题。评估对建议干预措施的接受程度以及 CPOE/CDSS 中的警示情况。主要结局为临床药师发现的药物相关问题中,经 CPOE/CDSS 警示的比例。将引发警示和未引发警示的药物相关问题之间的差异表示为相对风险,并采用卡方检验或曼-惠特尼 U 检验进行分析。
临床药师发现的经 CPOE/CDSS 警示的药物相关问题的比例。
在 1206 次药物评估中,发现了 442 个潜在的药物相关问题;其中 286 个(65%)药物相关问题被认为相关,247 个(56%)建议干预措施被接受。临床药师发现的药物相关问题中,有 35 个(8%)引发了 CPOE/CDSS 警示。唯一的差异是药物相关问题的类别(适应证 23%比 36%,有效性 23%比 13%,安全性 23%比 10%,药物治疗问题 31%比 42%,p=0.02)。CPOE/CDSS 还触发了 623 次其他警示,这些警示在常规药学服务期间得到了处理。
由于临床药师发现的大多数药物相关问题并未被 CPOE/CDSS 在日常临床实践中发现,因此临床药师有助于减少药物相关问题。应优化 CPOE/CDSS 检测某些类别问题的灵敏度。