Louvain Experimental Psychopathology research group (LEP), Psychological Science Research Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Numerical Cognition Group, Psychological Science Research Institute and Neuroscience Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Addiction. 2024 Jan;119(1):102-112. doi: 10.1111/add.16333. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
Competing models disagree on three theoretical questions regarding alcohol-related attentional bias (AB), a key process in severe alcohol use disorder (SAUD): (1) is AB more of a trait (fixed, associated with alcohol use severity) or state (fluid, associated with momentary craving states) characteristic of SAUD; (2) does AB purely reflect the over-activation of the reflexive/reward system or is it also influenced by the activity of the reflective/control system and (3) does AB rely upon early or later processing stages? We addressed these issues by investigating the time-course of AB and its modulation by subjective craving and cognitive load in SAUD.
A free-viewing eye-tracking task, presenting pictures of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, combined with a concurrent cognitive task with three difficulty levels.
A laboratory setting in the detoxification units of three Belgian hospitals.
We included 30 patients with SAUD self-reporting craving at testing time, 30 patients with SAUD reporting a total absence of craving and 30 controls matched on sex and age. All participants from SAUD groups met the DSM-5 criteria for SAUD.
We assessed AB through early and late eye-tracking indices. We evaluated the modulation of AB by craving (comparison between patients with/without craving) and cognitive load (variation of AB with the difficulty level of the concurrent task).
Dwell time measure indicated that SAUD patients with craving allocated more attention towards alcohol-related stimuli than patients without craving (P < 0.001, d = 1.093), resulting in opposite approach/avoidance AB according to craving presence/absence. SAUD patients without craving showed a stronger avoidance AB than controls (P = 0.003, d = 0.806). AB did not vary according to cognitive load (P = 0.962, η = 0.004).
The direction of alcohol-related attentional bias (approach/avoidance) appears to be determined by patients' subjective craving at testing time and does not function as a stable trait of severe alcohol use disorder. Alcohol-related attentional bias appears to rely on later/controlled attentional stages but is not modulated by the saturation of the reflective/control system.
关于与酒精相关的注意力偏差(AB),有三个理论问题存在竞争模型,这是严重酒精使用障碍(SAUD)的一个关键过程:(1)AB 更多地是一种特质(固定的,与酒精使用严重程度相关)还是状态(流动的,与当前的渴望状态相关)特征的 SAUD;(2)AB 是否纯粹反映了反射/奖励系统的过度激活,还是也受到反射/控制系统的活动的影响,以及(3)AB 是否依赖于早期或晚期的处理阶段?我们通过研究 SAUD 中 AB 的时间进程及其对主观渴望和认知负荷的调节来解决这些问题。
一种自由观看眼动追踪任务,呈现酒精和非酒精饮料的图片,并结合具有三个难度级别的并发认知任务。
在三家比利时医院的戒毒单位的实验室环境中进行。
我们纳入了 30 名报告测试时渴望的 SAUD 患者,30 名报告完全没有渴望的 SAUD 患者和 30 名性别和年龄匹配的对照者。所有来自 SAUD 组的参与者都符合 DSM-5 对 SAUD 的标准。
我们通过早期和晚期眼动追踪指数评估 AB。我们通过渴望(比较有/无渴望的患者)和认知负荷(与并发任务难度水平的变化)来评估 AB 的调节。
逗留时间测量表明,有渴望的 SAUD 患者比没有渴望的患者更关注与酒精相关的刺激(P < 0.001,d = 1.093),这导致了根据渴望的存在/不存在,相反的趋近/回避 AB。没有渴望的 SAUD 患者比对照组表现出更强的回避 AB(P = 0.003,d = 0.806)。AB 不随认知负荷而变化(P = 0.962,η² = 0.004)。
与酒精相关的注意力偏差(趋近/回避)的方向似乎取决于患者在测试时的主观渴望,并且不作为严重酒精使用障碍的稳定特征起作用。与酒精相关的注意力偏差似乎依赖于晚期/控制注意力阶段,但不受反射/控制系统的饱和的调节。