Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, PR China.
School of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, PR China.
Nat Commun. 2023 Sep 2;14(1):5334. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41051-w.
Despite the proven virological advantages, there remains some controversy regarding whether first-line integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) contributes to reducing mortality of people living with HIV (PLHIV) in clinical practice. Here we report a retrospective study comparing all-cause mortality among PLHIV in China who were on different initial ART regimens (nevirapine, efavirenz, dolutegravir, lopinavir, and others [including darunavir, raltegravie, elvitegravir and rilpivirine]) between 2017 and 2019. A total of 41,018 individuals were included across China, representing 21.3% of newly reported HIV/AIDS cases collectively in the country during this period. Only the differences in all-cause mortality of PLHIV between the efavirenz group and the nevirapine group, the dolutegravir group and the nevirapine group, and the lopinavir group and the nevirapine group, were observed in China. After stratifying the cause of mortality, we found that the differences in mortality between initial ART regimens were mainly observed in AIDS-related mortality.
尽管已证实整合酶抑制剂(INSTIs)在病毒学方面具有优势,但关于一线基于整合酶抑制剂的抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)是否有助于降低艾滋病毒感染者(PLHIV)的死亡率,在临床实践中仍存在一些争议。在此,我们报告了一项回顾性研究,比较了中国在 2017 年至 2019 年期间,采用不同初始抗逆转录病毒治疗方案(奈韦拉平、依非韦伦、多替拉韦、洛匹那韦和其他药物[包括达芦那韦、拉替拉韦、艾维雷韦和利匹韦林])的 PLHIV 的全因死亡率。共纳入了来自中国各地的 41,018 名个体,占同期全国新报告的艾滋病毒/艾滋病病例的 21.3%。仅观察到中国依非韦伦组与奈韦拉平组、多替拉韦组与奈韦拉平组以及洛匹那韦组与奈韦拉平组之间的 PLHIV 全因死亡率差异。在对死亡率的原因进行分层后,我们发现初始 ART 方案之间死亡率的差异主要发生在艾滋病相关死亡率方面。