Sortland O, Nerdrum H J, Solheim K
Acta Chir Scand. 1986 Jun-Jul;152:453-61.
In a prospective study of 48 patients suspected to have splenic injury, the diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) and scintigraphy was investigated. Both methods showed high sensitivity, demonstrating 27 of 28 ruptures. The specificity was 100% for CT and 80% for scintigraphy, since the latter method gave four false-positive diagnoses with regard to rupture and bleeding. Scintigraphy, however, has advantages over CT in children and noncooperative adults and is highly suitable in local trauma to the left lower thorax. CT is preferable in cases with possible trauma to multiple organs, such as commonly occurs in traffic accidents, and also provides a rough estimate of the extent of bleeding.
在一项对48例疑似脾损伤患者的前瞻性研究中,对计算机断层扫描(CT)和闪烁扫描的诊断价值进行了调查。两种方法均显示出高敏感性,28例破裂中有27例被检测出来。CT的特异性为100%,闪烁扫描的特异性为80%,因为后一种方法在破裂和出血方面给出了4例假阳性诊断。然而,闪烁扫描在儿童和不合作的成年人中比CT具有优势,并且非常适用于左下胸部的局部创伤。在可能有多个器官受创伤的情况下,如交通事故中常见的情况,CT更可取,并且还能对出血程度提供一个粗略估计。