• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于 COPD 患者三联疗法的临床概念:德尔菲共识。

Clinical Concepts for Triple Therapy Use in Patients with COPD: A Delphi Consensus.

机构信息

Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron/Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain.

Emerging Markets, GlaxoSmithKline, Singapore.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Aug 28;18:1853-1866. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S424128. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/COPD.S424128
PMID:37662490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10474219/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Role of triple therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management is supported by growing evidence, but consensus is lacking on various aspects. We conducted a Delphi survey in respiratory experts on the effects of triple therapy on exacerbation reduction, early optimization, pneumonia risk, and mortality benefits in COPD management.

METHODS

The study comprised 2-round online surveys and a participant meeting with 21 respiratory experts from 10 countries. The 31-statement questionnaire was prepared using Decipher software after literature review. Responses were recorded using Likert scale ranging from 1 (disagreement) to 9 (agreement) with a consensus threshold of 75%.

RESULTS

All experts participated in both surveys and 14/21 attended participant meeting. Consensus was reached on 13/31 questions in first survey and 4/14 in second survey on: mortality benefits of triple therapy; comparable pneumonia risk between single inhaler triple therapy (SITT) and multiple inhaler triple therapy (81%); preference of SITT for patients with high eosinophil count (95%); exacerbation risk reduction and healthcare cost benefits with early initiation of SITT post exacerbation-related hospitalization (<30 days) (86%). No consensus was reached on first line SITT use after first exacerbation resulting in COPD diagnosis (62%).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that there is consensus among experts regarding many of the key concepts about appropriate clinical use and benefits of triple therapy in COPD. More evidence is required for evaluating the benefits of early optimisation of triple therapy.

摘要

目的

越来越多的证据支持三联疗法在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)管理中的作用,但在许多方面尚未达成共识。我们对呼吸专家进行了一项关于三联疗法在 COPD 管理中对减少加重、早期优化、肺炎风险和降低死亡率的影响的 Delphi 调查。

方法

该研究包括两轮在线调查和一次有 10 个国家的 21 名呼吸专家参加的会议。该 31 项陈述的调查问卷是在文献复习后使用 Decipher 软件编写的。使用李克特量表记录专家的回答,范围从 1(不同意)到 9(同意),共识阈值为 75%。

结果

所有专家都参加了两轮调查,其中 14 名专家参加了会议。在第一轮调查中有 13/31 个问题达成了共识,在第二轮调查中有 4/14 个问题达成了共识,这些共识包括:三联疗法的死亡率益处;单吸入器三联疗法(SITT)和多吸入器三联疗法(81%)的肺炎风险相当;对于嗜酸性粒细胞计数高的患者,倾向于使用 SITT(95%);在因加重相关住院(<30 天)后早期开始 SITT 可降低加重风险和节省医疗保健费用(86%)。在首次加重后首次使用 SITT 作为一线治疗(62%)方面,未达成共识。

结论

本研究表明,专家们在三联疗法在 COPD 中的适当临床应用和获益的许多关键概念方面存在共识。需要更多的证据来评估早期优化三联疗法的获益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9f/10474219/ab3316023f4d/COPD-18-1853-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9f/10474219/fbd8e50ee268/COPD-18-1853-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9f/10474219/f5b01f1436e8/COPD-18-1853-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9f/10474219/bb94e153849f/COPD-18-1853-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9f/10474219/0d797cab1880/COPD-18-1853-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9f/10474219/f16abd12e1e7/COPD-18-1853-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9f/10474219/934f99e8ff0d/COPD-18-1853-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9f/10474219/ab3316023f4d/COPD-18-1853-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9f/10474219/fbd8e50ee268/COPD-18-1853-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9f/10474219/f5b01f1436e8/COPD-18-1853-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9f/10474219/bb94e153849f/COPD-18-1853-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9f/10474219/0d797cab1880/COPD-18-1853-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9f/10474219/f16abd12e1e7/COPD-18-1853-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9f/10474219/934f99e8ff0d/COPD-18-1853-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9f/10474219/ab3316023f4d/COPD-18-1853-g0007.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical Concepts for Triple Therapy Use in Patients with COPD: A Delphi Consensus.用于 COPD 患者三联疗法的临床概念:德尔菲共识。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Aug 28;18:1853-1866. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S424128. eCollection 2023.
2
Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Persistence, and Outcomes Among Patients With COPD Treated With Single- or Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis in Spain.在西班牙进行的一项回顾性分析:接受单一或多种吸入器三联疗法治疗 COPD 患者的临床特征、治疗持续性和结局。
Chest. 2022 Nov;162(5):1017-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.06.033. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
3
Comparative Adherence and Persistence of Single- and Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapies Among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in an English Real-World Primary Care Setting.在英国真实世界初级保健环境中,慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者使用单药和多药三联吸入疗法的依从性和持久性比较。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Sep 24;17:2417-2429. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S370540. eCollection 2022.
4
Delphi Consensus on Clinical Applications of GOLD 2023 Recommendations in COPD Management: How Aligned are Recommendations with Clinical Practice?关于《慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议2023年慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理建议》临床应用的德尔菲共识:建议与临床实践的契合度如何?
Pulm Ther. 2024 Mar;10(1):69-84. doi: 10.1007/s41030-023-00248-6. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
5
Comparison of treatment persistence, adherence, and risk of exacerbation in patients with COPD treated with single-inhaler multiple-inhaler triple therapy: A prospective observational study in China.单吸入器、多吸入器三联疗法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的治疗持续性、依从性及急性加重风险比较:一项中国的前瞻性观察研究
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Mar 21;14:1147985. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1147985. eCollection 2023.
6
Use and persistence of single and multiple inhaler triple therapy prescribed for patients with COPD in France: a retrospective study on THIN database (OPTI study).法国 COPD 患者使用和坚持单药及多药三联吸入治疗的情况:THIN 数据库的回顾性研究(OPTI 研究)。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023 Jun;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001585.
7
Prioritising outcomes for evaluating eosinophil-guided corticosteroid therapy among patients with acute COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalisation: a Delphi consensus study.在需要住院治疗的急性 COPD 加重患者中,评估嗜酸性粒细胞指导的皮质类固醇治疗的结局的优先级:一项德尔菲共识研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 1;10(7):e035811. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035811.
8
PROMETHEUS: Long-Term Exacerbation and Mortality Benefits of Implementing Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in the US COPD Population.普罗米修斯:在美国慢性阻塞性肺疾病人群中实施单吸入器三联疗法的长期病情加重和死亡率获益情况
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2023 Jan 24;10(1):20-27. doi: 10.36469/001c.55635. eCollection 2023.
9
When to use single-inhaler triple therapy in COPD: a practical approach for primary care health care professionals.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)何时使用单吸入器三联疗法:基层医疗保健专业人员的实用方法
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Feb 13;14:391-401. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S173901. eCollection 2019.
10
Estimation of the Clinical and Economic Impact of an Improvement in Adherence Based on the Use of Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in Patients with COPD.基于使用每日一次单吸入器三联疗法对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者依从性改善的临床和经济影响评估。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Jul 10;15:1643-1654. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S253567. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Risk of Pneumonia Between Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol and Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy in Patients with COPD Using Health Insurance Claims Data: Final Analysis of Post-Marketing Database Surveillance in Japan.使用医疗保险理赔数据比较糠酸氟替卡松/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗与多吸入器三联疗法在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中发生肺炎的风险:日本上市后数据库监测的最终分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 2;14(13):4697. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134697.
2
Real-World Effectiveness of Single-Inhaler Triple Treatment Through Assorted Respiratory Outcomes When Switched From Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapies (RESTART): A Prospective Cohort Study of Korean Patients With COPD.从多吸入器三联疗法转换为单吸入器三联疗法后的多种呼吸结局的真实世界有效性(重启):一项针对韩国慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的前瞻性队列研究
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 Apr 11;20:1039-1050. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S499686. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The role of modeling studies in asthma management and clinical decision-making: a Delphi survey of physician knowledge and perceptions.模型研究在哮喘管理和临床决策中的作用:一项医师知识和认知的德尔菲调查。
J Asthma. 2023 Sep;60(9):1687-1701. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2180748. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
2
LABA/LAMA as First-Line Therapy for COPD: A Summary of the Evidence and Guideline Recommendations.长效β2受体激动剂/长效抗胆碱能药物作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病的一线治疗:证据及指南推荐综述
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 8;11(22):6623. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226623.
3
Prognostic risk factors for moderate-to-severe exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic literature review.
A Delphi Consensus Project to Capture Greek Experts' Opinion on the Position of Triple Therapies in COPD: Why, When and to Whom.一项德尔菲共识项目,旨在收集希腊专家对慢性阻塞性肺疾病三联疗法的应用立场的意见:为何、何时以及适用于何人。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 Feb 26;20:457-471. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S481337. eCollection 2025.
4
Prospective Randomized Study on Switching Triple Inhaler Therapy in COPD from Multiple Inhaler Devices to a Single Inhaler Device in a Chinese Population.中国人群中慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)三联吸入疗法从多种吸入装置转换为单一吸入装置的前瞻性随机研究。
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2025 Jan 29;12(1):52-60. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0519.
5
Improving the Transparency and Replicability of Consensus Methods: Respiratory Medicine as a Case Example.提高共识方法的透明度和可重复性:以呼吸医学为例
Pragmat Obs Res. 2024 Oct 15;15:201-207. doi: 10.2147/POR.S478163. eCollection 2024.
6
Association between Increased Risk of Pneumonia with ICS in COPD: A Continuous Variable Analysis of Patient Factors from the IMPACT Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病中吸入性糖皮质激素与肺炎风险增加之间的关联:来自IMPACT研究的患者因素连续变量分析
Pulm Ther. 2024 Jun;10(2):183-192. doi: 10.1007/s41030-024-00255-1. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
7
Delphi Consensus on Clinical Applications of GOLD 2023 Recommendations in COPD Management: How Aligned are Recommendations with Clinical Practice?关于《慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议2023年慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理建议》临床应用的德尔菲共识:建议与临床实践的契合度如何?
Pulm Ther. 2024 Mar;10(1):69-84. doi: 10.1007/s41030-023-00248-6. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中重度加重的预后危险因素:系统文献回顾。
Respir Res. 2022 Aug 23;23(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02123-5.
4
Pulmonologists' Opinion on the Use of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients in Spain: A Cross-Sectional Survey.西班牙肺科医生对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者使用吸入性皮质类固醇的看法:一项横断面调查。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Jul 12;17:1577-1587. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S369118. eCollection 2022.
5
Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Persistence, and Outcomes Among Patients With COPD Treated With Single- or Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis in Spain.在西班牙进行的一项回顾性分析:接受单一或多种吸入器三联疗法治疗 COPD 患者的临床特征、治疗持续性和结局。
Chest. 2022 Nov;162(5):1017-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.06.033. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
6
A Pooled Analysis of Mortality in Patients with COPD Receiving Dual Bronchodilation with and without Additional Inhaled Corticosteroid.COPD 患者接受双联支气管扩张剂治疗与附加吸入性皮质类固醇治疗的死亡率的汇总分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Mar 11;17:545-558. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S350167. eCollection 2022.
7
Benefit of Prompt versus Delayed Use of Single-Inhaler Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) Following a COPD Exacerbation.在 COPD 加重后,即刻使用与延迟使用单吸入器糠酸氟替卡松/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗(FF/UMEC/VI)的获益。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Mar 5;17:491-504. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S337668. eCollection 2022.
8
The Impact of 52-Week Single Inhaler Device Triple Therapy versus Dual Therapy on the Mortality of COPD Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.52周单吸入器装置三联疗法与双联疗法对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者死亡率的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Life (Basel). 2022 Jan 25;12(2):173. doi: 10.3390/life12020173.
9
Trends and Characteristics of Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Guidelines-Discordant Prescribing of Triple Therapy Among Patients with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议指南的趋势与特征——慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者三联疗法的不一致处方情况
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2022 Apr 29;9(2):135-153. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2021.0256.
10
Consensus on mild asthma management: results of a modified Delphi study.轻度哮喘管理共识:一项改良德尔菲研究的结果
J Asthma. 2023 Jan;60(1):145-157. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2022.2034850. Epub 2022 Feb 21.