Suppr超能文献

三种不同的儿童牙科后牙修复材料溶解率的比较评估:一项研究。

A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An Study.

作者信息

Raman Vigneshwar, Srinivasan Daya, Eagappan Ar Senthil, Harish S S

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Chettinad Dental College & Research Institute (CDCRI), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Aug;16(Suppl 1):S20-S26. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2577.

Abstract

AIM

The study aimed to compare and assess the dissolution rate, color stability, and other mechanical parameters, such as compressive and flexural strength, of three distinct posterior restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The three posterior restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry are divided into group I-Zirconomer, group II-Composite, and group III-Cention N. Around 111 cylindrical specimens were grouped into three groups of 37 each. According to the manufacturer's standards, all materials were proportioned and handled. The materials were thermocycler in a chewing simulator and were subjected to various tests to estimate the dissolution rate, compressive strength, flexural strength, and color stability of the three individual groups.

RESULTS

The dissolution rate was highest in Zirconomer, followed by Cention N and Composite, which were highly significant ( = 0.05). Compressive strength was highest with Cention N, followed by Composite and Zirconomer, which was highly important ( = 0.05). Cention N had the greatest flexural strength, followed by Composite and Zirconomer, which were highly significant ( = 0.05). Finally, the Composite had the highest color stability, followed by Cention N and Zirconomer among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that resin-based restorative materials outperform glass ionomer-based Zirconomer cement in terms of dissolution rate, compressive strength, flexural strength, and color stability.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Because of the widespread improvement in dental materials, many dental restorative types of cement have emerged on the market. The features of good restorative materials are mechanical strength, fluid dissolution rate, and retention.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Raman V, Srinivasan D, AR SE, A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(S-1):S20-S26.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较和评估三种用于儿童牙科的不同后牙修复材料的溶解速率、颜色稳定性以及其他力学参数,如抗压强度和抗弯强度。

材料与方法

用于儿童牙科的三种后牙修复材料分为第一组——锆基陶瓷,第二组——复合树脂,第三组——Cention N。约111个圆柱形试件被分为三组,每组37个。根据制造商的标准,对所有材料进行配比和处理。将材料置于咀嚼模拟器中的热循环仪中,并对三组材料分别进行各种测试,以评估其溶解速率、抗压强度、抗弯强度和颜色稳定性。

结果

锆基陶瓷的溶解速率最高,其次是Cention N和复合树脂,差异具有高度显著性(P = 0.05)。Cention N的抗压强度最高,其次是复合树脂和锆基陶瓷,差异具有高度显著性(P = 0.05)。Cention N的抗弯强度最大,其次是复合树脂和锆基陶瓷,差异具有高度显著性(P = 0.05)。最后,在三组中,复合树脂的颜色稳定性最高,其次是Cention N和锆基陶瓷。

结论

得出结论,在溶解速率、抗压强度、抗弯强度和颜色稳定性方面,树脂基修复材料优于玻璃离子基锆基陶瓷水门汀。

临床意义

由于牙科材料的广泛改进,市场上出现了许多类型的牙科修复水门汀。良好修复材料的特性包括机械强度、液体溶解速率和固位力。

如何引用本文

拉曼·V、斯里尼瓦桑·D、AR·SE,《三种用于儿童牙科的不同后牙修复材料溶解速率的比较评估:一项研究》。《国际临床儿科牙科杂志》2023年;16(增刊1):S20 - S26。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab51/10474400/08c53f04ca62/ijcpd-16-20-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验