• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cention-N、复合树脂和玻璃离子水门汀修复材料的力学性能和微渗漏性能的比较评估

Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical and Microleakage Properties of Cention-N, Composite, and Glass Ionomer Cement Restorative Materials.

作者信息

Sujith Ramachandra, Yadav Tej G, Pitalia Deepti, Babaji Prashant, Apoorva Kommula, Sharma Ankita

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, Sharavathi Dental College, Shimoga, Karnataka, India.

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Goenka Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Jun 1;21(6):691-695.

PMID:33025941
Abstract

AIM

The longevity of restorative materials depends on the resistance to masticatory forces. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the mechanical and microleakage properties of Cention-N with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and composite restorative materials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 45 specimen blocks were prepared with 15 samples of each type of restorative material, namely Cention-N, GIC, and hybrid composite. Samples were subjected to load at crosshead speed of 0.75 ± 0.25 mm/min till the fracture of sample. Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of orthodontically extracted premolars followed by restoration of each test material. All the surfaces of the tooth were coated with clear nail varnish except 1 mm around the margins of the restorations. These samples were immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsine dye and longitudinally sectioned and observed under stereomicroscope to check microleakage. The obtained data were statistically evaluated.

RESULTS

We found the highest mean compressive and flexural strength for hybrid composite followed by Cention-N and least for GIC which is statistically significant ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Mean microleakage was least for Cention-N. Cention-N is a newer restorative material having higher mechanical properties with lesser microleakage.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Cention-N is a newer restorative material having promising properties. This material can be used as an alternative restorative material.

摘要

目的

修复材料的使用寿命取决于对咀嚼力的抵抗力。本研究旨在评估Cention-N与玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)及复合修复材料的力学性能和微渗漏性能。

材料与方法

共制备45个样本块,每种修复材料各15个样本,分别为Cention-N、GIC和混合复合材料。样本以0.75±0.25mm/min的十字头速度加载直至样本断裂。在正畸拔除的前磨牙颊面制备V类洞,然后用每种测试材料进行修复。除修复体边缘周围1mm外,牙齿的所有表面均涂有透明指甲油。将这些样本浸入0.5%碱性品红染料中,纵向切片并在体视显微镜下观察以检查微渗漏情况。对获得的数据进行统计学评估。

结果

我们发现混合复合材料的平均抗压强度和抗弯强度最高,其次是Cention-N,GIC最低,具有统计学意义(<0.001)。

结论

Cention-N的平均微渗漏最少。Cention-N是一种新型修复材料,具有较高的力学性能和较少的微渗漏。

临床意义

Cention-N是一种具有良好性能的新型修复材料。这种材料可作为替代修复材料使用。

相似文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical and Microleakage Properties of Cention-N, Composite, and Glass Ionomer Cement Restorative Materials.Cention-N、复合树脂和玻璃离子水门汀修复材料的力学性能和微渗漏性能的比较评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Jun 1;21(6):691-695.
2
Microleakage Evaluation of an Alkasite Restorative Material: An Dye Penetration Study.一种碱硅质修复材料的微渗漏评估:一项染料渗透研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Nov 1;20(11):1315-1318.
3
Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three different direct restorative materials (silver amalgam, glass ionomer cement, cention N), in Class II restorations using stereomicroscope: An study.使用体视显微镜对三种不同直接修复材料(银汞合金、玻璃离子水门汀、Cention N)在Ⅱ类洞修复中的微渗漏进行比较评估:一项研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2019 Mar-Apr;30(2):277-281. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_481_17.
4
Assessment of Microleakage Using Dye Penetration Method in Primary Teeth Restored with Tooth-colored Materials: An Study.使用染料渗透法评估用牙齿颜色材料修复的乳牙的微渗漏:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Jul 1;20(7):778-782.
5
Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An study.使用和不使用粘结剂的碱土修复材料与流动复合树脂修复Ⅴ类洞周围微渗漏的比较评价:一项研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2019 May-Jun;30(3):403-407. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_767_17.
6
Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.硅酸三钙基修复材料与不透射线的后牙玻璃离子修复水门汀在乳牙和恒牙中抗剪切粘结强度及微渗漏的比较评价:一项体外研究
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014 Oct-Dec;32(4):304-10. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.140952.
7
Comparative Assessment of Marginal Micro Leakage of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials Used on Primary Teeth: An Study.不同美学修复材料用于乳牙的边缘微渗漏的比较评估:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024 Jan 1;25(1):58-61. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3595.
8
Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An study.不同时期釉质微磨除对V类树脂改性玻璃离子和复合体修复体微渗漏影响的比较评价:一项研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2017 Nov-Dec;28(6):675-680. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_657_16.
9
Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.卡波姆/氟磷灰石增强玻璃离子水门汀在乳牙修复中微渗漏的比较评估
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2016 Sep;17(3):227-233.
10
Effect of protective coating agents on microleakage and flexural strength of glass ionomer cement and zirconomer. an in vitro study.保护涂料对玻璃离子水门汀和氧化锆增强玻璃离子水门汀微渗漏和弯曲强度的影响:一项体外研究。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2024 Feb;25(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s40368-023-00853-8. Epub 2023 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of clinical efficacy of Cention N and Tetric N-ceram in class I carious lesion in primary mandibular molars.Cention N和Tetric N-ceram用于治疗下颌第一乳磨牙Ⅰ类龋损的临床疗效评价
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 Nov-Dec;15(6):1231-1237. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.08.006. Epub 2025 Aug 9.
2
Bond strength durability of three bioactive restorative materials to silver diamine fluoride treated artificially demineralized dentine.三种生物活性修复材料与经氟化亚银处理的人工脱矿牙本质的粘结强度耐久性
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 17;25(1):1193. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06552-8.
3
Short-Term Assessment of Cention N vs. Glass Ionomer Cement (Fuji IX) as a Definitive Restoration in the Primary Dentition of Mexican Children: A Pilot Study.
墨西哥儿童乳牙永久性修复中Cention N与玻璃离子水门汀(Fuji IX)的短期评估:一项试点研究。
Cureus. 2025 May 9;17(5):e83784. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83784. eCollection 2025 May.
4
The effect of Er:YAG and Nd:YAG lasers and total-etch and universal adhesives on composite resin restoration microleakage.铒钇铝石榴石激光、掺钕钇铝石榴石激光以及全酸蚀和通用粘结剂对复合树脂修复体微渗漏的影响。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2025 May 1;17(5):e535-e541. doi: 10.4317/jced.62641. eCollection 2025 May.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release/Uptake and Physical Properties of Self-adhesive GC Gold Label Hybrid and Antibiotic-modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An Study.自粘性GC金标混合树脂与抗生素改性玻璃离子水门汀的氟释放/摄取及物理性能的比较评价:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2025 Feb;18(2):146-152. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3052. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
6
Comparative evaluation of bioactive alkasite-based material in different application modes: a 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial.不同应用模式下基于碱硅铝石的生物活性材料的比较评估:一项为期1年的随机对照临床试验。
Odontology. 2025 Apr 15. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01095-4.
7
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage and Compressive Strength of Different Restorative Materials - An Study.不同修复材料微渗漏与抗压强度的比较评估——一项研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 4):S3818-S3820. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1174_24. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
8
Evaluation of bond durability of different self-adhesive bioactive restorative systems to dentin.不同自粘接生物活性修复系统与牙本质的粘接耐久性评估。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 29;15(1):3667. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81351-9.
9
Comparative evaluation of surface roughness and bacterial adhesion on two bioactive cements: an in-vitro study.两种生物活性水泥表面粗糙度和细菌黏附的比较评价:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):1278. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05083-y.
10
Alkasite restorative material for endodontically treated teeth: a randomized controlled pilot study.用于根管治疗牙齿的碱式硅铝酸盐修复材料:一项随机对照试验性研究。
Restor Dent Endod. 2024 Jun 11;49(3):e24. doi: 10.5395/rde.2024.49.e24. eCollection 2024 Aug.