Cao Peijun, Zhao Qingchun, Li Yongwen, Shi Ruifeng, Zhu Guangsheng, Zhang Zihe, Zhang Hongbing, Liu Minghui, Wei Sen, Liu Hongyu, Chen Jun
Department of Lung Cancer Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Metastasis and Tumor Microenvironment, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Aug 17;14:1140894. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1140894. eCollection 2023.
Alectinib has been approved as first-line treatment for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma. Oncologists are also exploring the possibility of applying alectinib in the perioperative period. Here, we present a patient with locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma associated with - fusion mutation, who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and alectinib treatment, and then underwent thoracoscopic left lower lung lobectomy. The patient initially received eight chemotherapy cycles and achieved partial remission. After eight cycles of chemotherapy, the lymph nodes in the hilar region again enlarged. The patient was then switched to 4 months of alectinib therapy, but no significant lesion changes were detected on imaging during this period. This raised the question of whether the patient developed alectinib resistance. The pathological findings of the postoperative lung lobe specimens indicated extensive necrosis in the tumor area with no residual tumor cells and massive chronic inflammatory cell infiltration around the tumor area, confirming inconsistency between the imaging findings and pathological results. Multi-point tumor specimen sampling was postoperatively performed. Tumor immune-related gene expression was detected in the sample with the help of the PanCancer IO360™ panel based on the nCounter platform. This is a rare case of a patient who was treated with neoadjuvant alectinib and had paradoxical radiographic findings and pathological responses. The possibility that intratumoral immune heterogeneity was responsible for this phenomenon has been discussed. Based on the findings, it is argued that the pathological response should be an important basis for assessing the effectiveness of neoadjuvant alectinib therapy.
阿来替尼已被批准作为间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)阳性非小细胞肺癌的一线治疗药物。肿瘤学家也在探索在围手术期应用阿来替尼的可能性。在此,我们报告一名患有与 - 融合突变相关的局部晚期肺腺癌患者,该患者接受了新辅助化疗和阿来替尼治疗,随后接受了胸腔镜左下肺叶切除术。患者最初接受了8个周期的化疗并实现部分缓解。8个周期化疗后,肺门区域淋巴结再次肿大。然后该患者改用阿来替尼治疗4个月,但在此期间影像学检查未发现明显病变变化。这就提出了该患者是否产生阿来替尼耐药性的问题。术后肺叶标本的病理结果显示肿瘤区域广泛坏死,无残留肿瘤细胞,肿瘤区域周围有大量慢性炎性细胞浸润,证实了影像学检查结果与病理结果不一致。术后进行了多点肿瘤标本采样。借助基于nCounter平台的泛癌IO360™检测板在样本中检测肿瘤免疫相关基因表达。这是一例接受新辅助阿来替尼治疗且出现矛盾的影像学表现和病理反应的罕见病例。已经讨论了肿瘤内免疫异质性导致这种现象的可能性。基于这些发现,有人认为病理反应应作为评估新辅助阿来替尼治疗效果的重要依据。