Pannizzo F, Amikam S, Bagwell P, Furman S
Am Heart J. 1986 Oct;112(4):780-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(86)90474-6.
The inability of cardiac pacemakers to selectively reject retrograde P waves limits the usefulness of dual-chamber pacemakers (because of the possibility of endless loop tachycardias) and of antitachycardia devices which use a dual-chamber sensing algorithm. In order to determine selective sensing parameters, amplitude, slew rate, and configuration of antegrade and retrograde atrial electrograms were measured in 34 patients undergoing dual-chamber pacemaker implant--31 with unipolar and three with bipolar units. All antegrade and retrograde pairs were measurably different. All 34 cases had measurable antegrade/retrograde amplitude differences; 30 of the unipolar cases (96.8%) and all bipolar cases displayed antegrade/retrograde amplitude differences of at least 0.25 mV. Thirty of the unipolar cases (96.8%) and two bipolar cases had measurable slew rate differences. Configuration differed in 14 of 31 (45.2%) of unipolar and in two bipolar cases. A combined criterion with 0.25 mV sensitivity steps (available in at least two presently available pacemakers) and 0.5 V/sec slew rate gradations (through the use of externally programmable filters) would allow the discrimination of retrograde from antegrade depolarizations in all 34 cases. With the use of amplitude and slew rate differences, it is therefore possible to reject retrograde P waves while sensing antegrade P waves with current technology.
心脏起搏器无法选择性地拒绝逆行P波,这限制了双腔起搏器(由于存在无休止环形心动过速的可能性)以及使用双腔感知算法的抗心动过速装置的实用性。为了确定选择性感知参数,对34例接受双腔起搏器植入的患者测量了顺行和逆行心房电图的幅度、 slew速率和形态——31例使用单极起搏器,3例使用双极起搏器。所有顺行和逆行配对均有可测量的差异。所有34例患者均有可测量的顺行/逆行幅度差异;31例单极起搏器患者中的30例(96.8%)和所有双极起搏器患者均显示顺行/逆行幅度差异至少为0.25 mV。31例单极起搏器患者中的30例(96.8%)和2例双极起搏器患者有可测量的slew速率差异。31例单极起搏器患者中的14例(45.2%)和2例双极起搏器患者的形态不同。采用0.25 mV灵敏度步长(至少两种现有起搏器具备)和0.5 V/秒slew速率分级(通过使用外部可编程滤波器)的组合标准,可在所有34例患者中区分逆行与顺行去极化。因此,利用幅度和slew速率差异,采用当前技术在感知顺行P波的同时拒绝逆行P波是可能的。