Suppr超能文献

心房电图分析:顺行与逆行

Atrial electrogram analysis: antegrade versus retrograde.

作者信息

McAlister H F, Klementowicz P T, Calderon E M, Benedek Z M, Furman S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York 10467.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 Nov;11(11 Pt 2):1703-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb06299.x.

Abstract

Automatic discrimination between antegrade and retrograde atrial electrograms would prevent endless loop tachycardia and contribute to tachycardia detection algorithms. We tested its feasibility by comparing antegrade and retrograde atrial electrograms in 129 patients at the time of atrial lead implantation. Only unipolar, passive-fixation, endocardial, right atrial appendage leads were included. The mean antegrade amplitude was 4.2 +/- 2.2 mV, and retrograde 2.4 +/- 1.5 mV (P less than 0.001); the mean antegrade slew rate was 2.6 +/- 2.1 mV/ms, and retrograde 1.3 +/- 1.1 mV/ms (P less than 0.001). Morphology was similar in 84 patients (65%). The antegrade amplitude exceeded the retrograde by 1.0 mV in 67%, and by 0.5 mV in 81% of patients. Morphology and slew rate contributed little to the discriminating power of amplitude alone. Thus, amplitude criteria reliably distinguish antegrade from retrograde atrial activity.

摘要

自动区分顺行性和逆行性心房电图可预防无休止环性心动过速,并有助于心动过速检测算法。我们通过在129例患者植入心房导线时比较顺行性和逆行性心房电图来测试其可行性。仅纳入单极、被动固定、心内膜、右心耳导线。顺行性平均振幅为4.2±2.2mV,逆行性为2.4±1.5mV(P<0.001);顺行性平均上升速率为2.6±2.1mV/ms,逆行性为1.3±1.1mV/ms(P<0.001)。84例患者(65%)的形态相似。67%的患者顺行性振幅超过逆行性1.0mV,81%的患者超过0.5mV。形态和上升速率对仅靠振幅的鉴别能力贡献不大。因此,振幅标准可可靠地区分顺行性和逆行性心房活动。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验