Li Qiuying, Yang Kai
Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024 Apr;27(2):244-250. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12710. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
This study aimed to assess the loss rate of attachments and investigate its probable influencing factors in patients during orthodontic therapy with clear aligners.
A total of 55 patients treated with clear aligners were enrolled in this prospective clinical study. The loss rate of attachments was evaluated after a 6-month follow-up since the initial bonding was finished. The attachment survival curves were gone through Kaplan-Meier estimates. The Cox regression model with shared frailty was conducted to evaluate the hazard ratios (HRs) for the following factors, including sex, age, dental malocclusion, vertical skeletal pattern, anterior overbite, operators, tooth extraction, attachment amount, arch, tooth position and attachment type.
There were a total of 47 patients (14 males and 33 females; and mean age: 26.77 ± 8.45) in which 722 attachments were involved in the final analysis. During the 6-month follow-up, 99 attachments were lost by 40 participants. The overall loss rate was 13.7%. The loss of attachments was more common in the early months of therapy. During the first 2 months, 71 attachments were lost. The loss rate of attachments was not significantly affected by sex, age, dental malocclusion, vertical skeletal pattern, anterior overbite, operators, tooth extraction, attachment amount and attachment type (P > 0.05). The loss rate of mandibular attachments was 1.8 times that of maxillary attachments (HR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.2-2.8; P = 0.009). The loss rate of molar attachments was 5.5 times that of incisor attachments (HR = 5.5; 95% CI: 1.6-19; P = 0.007).
During the first 6 months, the overall loss rate of attachments was 13.7%. In the early months of therapy, loss of attachments was more common. The loss rate decreased as treatment time increased. Loss of attachments was significantly affected by arch and tooth position, with higher loss rates in the mandibular arch and molars. Besides, loss of attachments was not affected by sex, age, dental malocclusion, vertical skeletal pattern, anterior overbite, operators, tooth extraction, attachment amount and attachment type.
本研究旨在评估使用透明矫治器进行正畸治疗的患者中附件的脱落率,并探究其可能的影响因素。
本前瞻性临床研究共纳入55例接受透明矫治器治疗的患者。自最初粘结完成后进行6个月的随访,评估附件的脱落率。采用Kaplan-Meier法估计附件的生存曲线。使用具有共享脆弱性的Cox回归模型评估以下因素的风险比(HR),包括性别、年龄、牙列不齐、垂直骨骼型、前牙覆合、操作人员、拔牙情况、附件数量、牙弓、牙齿位置和附件类型。
最终分析共纳入47例患者(14例男性和33例女性;平均年龄:26.77±8.45岁),涉及722个附件。在6个月的随访期间,40名参与者的99个附件脱落。总体脱落率为13.7%。附件脱落在治疗的最初几个月更为常见。在最初的2个月内,71个附件脱落。附件脱落率不受性别、年龄、牙列不齐、垂直骨骼型、前牙覆合、操作人员、拔牙情况、附件数量和附件类型的显著影响(P>0.05)。下颌附件的脱落率是上颌附件的1.8倍(HR=1.8;95%CI:1.2-2.8;P=0.009)。磨牙附件的脱落率是切牙附件的5.5倍(HR=5.5;95%CI:1.6-19;P=0.007)。
在最初的6个月内,附件的总体脱落率为13.7%。在治疗的最初几个月,附件脱落更为常见。随着治疗时间的增加,脱落率下降。附件脱落受牙弓和牙齿位置的显著影响,下颌牙弓和磨牙的脱落率更高。此外,附件脱落不受性别、年龄、牙列不齐、垂直骨骼型、前牙覆合、操作人员、拔牙情况、附件数量和附件类型的影响。