Menegussi Janaina, Salvatore Freitas Karina Maria, Blatt Ohira Eduardo Terumi, de Souza José Eduardo Prado, Pinelli Valarelli Fabrício, Maio Pinzan-Vercelino Celia Regina, Fialho Tiago, Cotrin Paula
Department of Orthodontics, Ingá University Center UNINGÁ, Maringá, PR, Brazil.
Clinical Practice, Prado Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21042. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07098-z.
To evaluate patients' adaptability to attachments and their quality of life during the use of Invisalign®. 25 patients (mean age: 32.3 years) beginning treatment with Invisalign using attachments were evaluated. A questionnaire containing questions regarding comfort, esthetic, and Ohip-14 was applied in 4 stages: the same-day attachments were installed 15, 45, and 90 days after installation. Intragroup comparison between the evaluated stages was performed using repeated measures ANOVA. The correlation between the number of attachments and discomfort was assessed using Pearson's correlation test. The day the attachments were bonded was considered the most uncomfortable for patients to cheek adaptation (7.52 ± 2.87). There were no differences in aesthetic appearance and quality of life concerning the patient's perception of the attachments during the first 3 months of treatment. On the installation day, the maxillary attachments were more uncomfortable for the lips, cheeks, and tongue (p = 0.043; 0.013 and 0.004, respectively), while the mandibular attachments were for the lips and tongue (p = 0.004 and 0.029, respectively). There was a positive correlation between anterior attachments and the tongue on the first day (p = 0.010). For posterior attachments, this correlation occurred with the lips, cheeks, and tongue on the installation day (p = 0.002; 0.039 and 0.031, respectively), remaining significant at all stages only regarding lips (T1: p = 0.022; T2: p = 0.032 and T3: p = 0.017). There was some discomfort in the cheeks when the attachments were bonded. However, after 15 days, there was an improvement in adaptability and quality of life. The number of anterior and posterior attachments was correlated with the lips, cheeks, and tongue discomfort at installation, and the number of posterior attachments, with lips discomfort during all stages evaluated. Orthodontists may guide their patients regarding adaptation to the attachments. Additionally, the orthodontist may base their treatment plans on using the fewest attachments possible.
评估患者在使用隐适美(Invisalign®)期间对附件的适应性及其生活质量。对25例开始使用附件进行隐适美治疗的患者(平均年龄:32.3岁)进行评估。在4个阶段应用了一份包含有关舒适度、美观度和Ohip - 14问题的问卷:安装附件当天、安装后15天、45天和90天。使用重复测量方差分析对评估阶段之间进行组内比较。使用Pearson相关检验评估附件数量与不适感之间的相关性。患者认为附件粘结当天对脸颊适应最不舒服(7.52±2.87)。在治疗的前3个月,患者对附件的美观度和生活质量的感知没有差异。在安装当天,上颌附件对嘴唇、脸颊和舌头更不舒服(分别为p = 0.043;0.013和0.004),而下颌附件对嘴唇和舌头更不舒服(分别为p = 0.004和0.029)。第一天,前牙附件与舌头之间存在正相关(p = 0.010)。对于后牙附件,这种相关性在安装当天与嘴唇、脸颊和舌头出现(分别为p = 0.002;0.039和0.031),仅在所有阶段中关于嘴唇仍具有显著性(T1:p = 0.022;T2:p = 0.032和T3:p = 0.017)。附件粘结时脸颊会有一些不适。然而,15天后,适应性和生活质量有所改善。前牙和后牙附件的数量与安装时嘴唇、脸颊和舌头的不适感相关,后牙附件的数量与所有评估阶段的嘴唇不适感相关。正畸医生可以指导患者适应附件。此外,正畸医生可以基于尽可能少使用附件来制定治疗计划。