Smell & Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Geriatric Neuroscience Center, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Laryngoscope. 2024 Jan;134(1):382-387. doi: 10.1002/lary.31015. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
Odorous stimulation helps to maintain or to improve olfactory function. In contrast, odor deprivation has been suggested to facilitate olfactory impairment. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of odor deprivation in people working in an odorless environment.
Fifty people working in an odorless environment for extended periods of time and 50 people not working in such environments were recruited. The participants were examined for olfactory function (using Sniffin' Sticks), nasal airflow (using peak nasal inspiratory flowmetry), self-rated olfactory function, self-rated nasal airflow, and well-being. Correlation analyses were used to explore the associations between the duration of working in odorless environment and olfaction, nasal airflow, and well-being.
The cleanroom workers exhibited slightly, but significantly reduced olfactory scores (sensitivity 7.0 ± 2.5, discrimination 11.4 ± 1.8) compared with controls (sensitivity 8.9 ± 2.5, F = 4.33, p = 0.03; discrimination 12.7 ± 1.6. F = 5.50, p = 0.001), even when controlling for age and rated nasal patency, with their self-rated olfactory function being not affected. The years of working in cleanrooms were negatively associated with olfactory function (r = 0.35, p = 0.013). No significant correlations were observed between scores of olfactory function, nasal patency, and well-being.
Compared with controls cleanroom workers exhibited slightly, but significantly lower olfactory scores, nasal peak flow, and well-being. Their decreased odor sensitivity was found to be associated with the number of years they had worked in the cleanroom. Overall, these results may suggest that odorous stimulation supports olfactory functioning.
4 Laryngoscope, 134:382-387, 2024.
气味刺激有助于维持或改善嗅觉功能。相反,气味剥夺被认为有助于嗅觉障碍。本研究旨在调查长期在无味环境中工作的人嗅觉丧失的影响。
招募了 50 名长期在无味环境中工作的人和 50 名不在此类环境中工作的人。使用嗅觉棒测试(Sniffin' Sticks)检查参与者的嗅觉功能、鼻气流(使用峰值鼻吸气流量测量)、自我评估嗅觉功能、自我评估鼻气流和幸福感。使用相关分析探讨在无味环境中工作时间与嗅觉、鼻气流和幸福感之间的关系。
与对照组相比(敏感性 7.0±2.5,辨别力 11.4±1.8),无尘室工作人员的嗅觉评分略低,但差异有统计学意义(敏感性 8.9±2.5,F=4.33,p=0.03;辨别力 12.7±1.6,F=5.50,p=0.001),即使控制了年龄和鼻气道通畅的自我评分,其自我评估的嗅觉功能不受影响。在无尘室工作的年限与嗅觉功能呈负相关(r=0.35,p=0.013)。嗅觉功能、鼻气道通畅和幸福感评分之间未观察到显著相关性。
与对照组相比,无尘室工作人员的嗅觉评分、鼻峰流速和幸福感略低,但差异有统计学意义。他们的气味敏感度下降与在无尘室工作的年限有关。总的来说,这些结果可能表明气味刺激支持嗅觉功能。
4 级喉镜,134:382-387,2024。