Suppr超能文献

刺激在嗅觉可塑性中的作用。

The Role of the Stimulus in Olfactory Plasticity.

作者信息

Coppola David M, Reisert Johannes

机构信息

Biology Department, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, VA 23005, USA.

Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2023 Nov 6;13(11):1553. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13111553.

Abstract

Plasticity, the term we use to describe the ability of a nervous system to change with experience, is the evolutionary adaptation that freed animal behavior from the confines of genetic determinism. This capacity, which increases with brain complexity, is nowhere more evident than in vertebrates, especially mammals. Though the scientific study of brain plasticity dates back at least to the mid-19th century, the last several decades have seen unprecedented advances in the field afforded by new technologies. Olfaction is one system that has garnered particular attention in this realm because it is the only sensory modality with a lifelong supply of new neurons, from two niches no less! Here, we review some of the classical and contemporary literature dealing with the role of the stimulus or lack thereof in olfactory plasticity. We have restricted our comments to studies in mammals that have used dual tools of the field: stimulus deprivation and stimulus enrichment. The former manipulation has been implemented most frequently by unilateral naris occlusion and, thus, we have limited our comments to research using this technique. The work reviewed on deprivation provides substantial evidence of activity-dependent processes in both developing and adult mammals at multiple levels of the system from olfactory sensory neurons through to olfactory cortical areas. However, more recent evidence on the effects of deprivation also establishes several compensatory processes with mechanisms at every level of the system, whose function seems to be the restoration of information flow in the face of an impoverished signal. The results of sensory enrichment are more tentative, not least because of the actual manipulation: What odor or odors? At what concentrations? On what schedule? All of these have frequently not been sufficiently rationalized or characterized. Perhaps it is not surprising, then, that discrepant results are common in sensory enrichment studies. Despite this problem, evidence has accumulated that even passively encountered odors can "teach" olfactory cortical areas to better detect, discriminate, and more efficiently encode them for future encounters. We discuss these and other less-established roles for the stimulus in olfactory plasticity, culminating in our recommended "aspirations" for the field going forward.

摘要

可塑性,即我们用来描述神经系统随经验变化的能力的术语,是一种进化适应,它使动物行为摆脱了基因决定论的束缚。这种能力随着大脑复杂性的增加而增强,在脊椎动物尤其是哺乳动物中表现得最为明显。尽管对大脑可塑性的科学研究至少可以追溯到19世纪中叶,但在过去几十年里,新技术为该领域带来了前所未有的进展。嗅觉是在这一领域备受特别关注的一个系统,因为它是唯一一种从两个神经龛源源不断产生新神经元的感觉方式!在这里,我们回顾一些经典和当代文献,探讨刺激或缺乏刺激在嗅觉可塑性中的作用。我们将评论限制在使用该领域两种工具的哺乳动物研究上:刺激剥夺和刺激丰富。前一种操作最常通过单侧鼻孔堵塞来实现,因此,我们将评论限制在使用该技术的研究上。关于剥夺的研究工作在从嗅觉感觉神经元到嗅觉皮质区域的系统多个层面上,为发育中和成年哺乳动物中依赖活动的过程提供了大量证据。然而,关于剥夺效应的最新证据也确立了系统各个层面上的几种补偿过程,其功能似乎是在信号匮乏的情况下恢复信息流。感觉丰富的结果更具试探性,尤其是因为实际操作:使用哪些气味?浓度是多少?按照什么时间表?所有这些往往都没有得到充分合理的解释或描述。那么,感觉丰富研究中出现不一致的结果也就不足为奇了。尽管存在这个问题,但越来越多的证据表明,即使是被动接触到的气味也可以“教导”嗅觉皮质区域更好地检测、区分并更有效地编码它们,以便未来再次遇到。我们讨论了刺激在嗅觉可塑性中的这些以及其他不太确定的作用,最后提出了我们对该领域未来的建议“期望”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ac/10669894/3f12f6f8516e/brainsci-13-01553-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验