Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cyprus Health and Social Sciences University, Guzelyurt, Turkey.
Aust Dent J. 2023 Dec;68(4):255-264. doi: 10.1111/adj.12975. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 18-month retrospective study of self-etch adhesive (Prime&Bond One Select) and self-etch mode of universal adhesives (Single Bond Universal, Gluma Bond Universal) applied to non-carious cervical lesions according to the World Dental Federation criteria.
Thirty patients without any systemic disease, good oral hygiene, having at least 20 teeth and six non-carious cervical lesions treated using a self-etch mode of adhesives operated between January and March 2017. Accordingly, 335 restorations were evaluated according to the World Dental Federation criteria at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months. Pillai's Trace test was used to determine the interaction of criteria with time and adhesive systems. IBM SPSS Statistics 21.0 program was used in the analysis. Value of P < 0.05 was accepted as a criterion for statistical significance.
At the end of 18 months, participation was 100%. There was a statistically significant difference P < 0.05 between Prime&Bond One Select and Single Bond Universal, Prime&Bond One Select and Gluma Bond Universal in the 18-month period. In terms of marginal staining, fracture of material and retention, recurrence of caries, erosion and abfraction, tooth integrity criteria at the end of the 18 months, Prime&Bond One Select performed clinically very good, Single Bond Universal and Gluma Bond Universal performed clinically good according to World Dental Federation criteria. Marginal adaptation criteria, Prime&Bond One Select, Single Bond Universal and Gluma Bond Universal performed clinically good. Retention loss rate was found to be the lowest in Prime&Bond One Select and the highest in Gluma Bond Universal.
Accordingly, 18-month evaluation of all adhesives used in the study showed clinically acceptable results in all of the World Dental Federation criteria.
本研究旨在评估自酸蚀黏接剂（Prime&Bond One Select）和通用自酸蚀黏接剂（Single Bond Universal、Gluma Bond Universal）在非龋性颈缘缺损中的 18 个月回顾性研究结果，评价标准采用世界牙科联盟（FDI）标准。
选择 30 名无任何系统性疾病、口腔卫生良好、至少有 20 颗天然牙且有 6 颗非龋性颈缘缺损的患者，于 2017 年 1-3 月采用自酸蚀黏接剂进行修复。按照 FDI 标准，分别在 3、6、12、18 个月时对 335 个修复体进行评价。采用 Pillai 迹线检验评估各项标准与时间及黏接系统之间的交互作用。采用 IBM SPSS Statistics 21.0 程序进行数据分析，以 P<0.05 为差异有统计学意义。
18 个月时，患者的参与率为 100%。Prime&Bond One Select 与 Single Bond Universal、Prime&Bond One Select 与 Gluma Bond Universal 之间在 18 个月时的差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。在边缘着色、材料折裂和脱落、继发龋、磨耗和酸蚀、牙体完整性方面，根据 FDI 标准，Prime&Bond One Select 在 18 个月时的临床效果为优秀，Single Bond Universal 和 Gluma Bond Universal 的临床效果为良好。在边缘适合性方面，Prime&Bond One Select、Single Bond Universal 和 Gluma Bond Universal 的临床效果为良好。黏接剂保留率最低的是 Prime&Bond One Select，最高的是 Gluma Bond Universal。
因此，研究中使用的所有黏接剂在所有 FDI 标准中均表现出可接受的 18 个月临床效果。
